flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Supreme Court case likely to have huge impact on Clean Water Act

Regulations

Supreme Court case likely to have huge impact on Clean Water Act

There are substantial implications for developers from the pending ruling.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | May 8, 2023
The U.S. Supreme Court as composed June 30, 2022 to present. Photo: Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court as composed June 30, 2022 to present. Front row, left to right: Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., and Associate Justice Elena Kagan. Back row, left to right: Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, and Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Credit: Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States

A case before the Supreme Court will likely determine how the Clean Water Act is interpreted and the ruling could open up new areas for development within or adjacent to wetlands.

Late last year, the Biden administration issued a new definition of “waters of the United States,” which broadened the numbers of streams and wetlands subject to regulations of the Act. States and national advocacy groups have sued to reverse that provision, and a federal judge has halted it in 24 states.

A case before the Supreme Court, Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, may settle the issue. Environmental advocates worry that the justices will gut the Clean Water Act by imposing a narrow reading on what counts as one of the “waters of the United States.”

The court could decide that the federal government doesn’t have authority to protect as many as of half of the country’s wetlands. That action could make many more acres of land nationwide available to developers.

The director of federal water policy at the Natural Resources Defense Council told Grist that the case’s impact is “hard to overstate.” It could make it a “huge problem” to achieve the organization’s water quality goals, he said.

But real estate developers would cheer such an outcome as it would eliminate uncertainty over which areas are subject to the Act, and how they could build on parcels in wetlands areas.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Aug 27, 2019

Slower speed limits in urban areas offer multiple benefits

Improved safety, better adoption of electric scooters and autonomous vehicles are possible if drivers ease off the accelerator.

Codes and Standards | Aug 27, 2019

Oregon rescinds tsunami-zone construction ban

Other states have no ban, but have strengthened building codes for tidal wave resilience.

Urban Planning | Aug 27, 2019

Pop-up parks revitalize empty lots

Pop-up parks that provide instant open areas for public use and programming can revitalize under-utilized spaces and add vibrancy to neighborhoods. 

Codes and Standards | Jul 15, 2019

USGBC calls for proposals for feedback, concepts for next LEED version

The move follows successful public input on LEED 4.1.

AEC Tech | Jul 15, 2019

Lack of standards hampers development of exoskeleton industry

Guidelines, common terminology, and testing methodology are needed, says expert. 

Concrete | Jul 8, 2019

Concrete repair code requirements released

American Concrete Institute offers guidance on assessment, repair, rehab of existing concrete structures.

K-12 Schools | Jul 8, 2019

Collaborative for High Performance Schools releases 2019 Core Criteria Version 3.0 Update

The update adds credits to lower carbon footprints and to promote climate change resiliency.

Wood | Jul 8, 2019

Campaign launched to promote ‘climate-smart wood’

The Forest Stewardship Council and other groups aim to help buyers understand and make it easier to locate lumber that meets sustainable forestry standards.

Urban Planning | Jul 8, 2019

U.S. cities experience ‘Doppler shift’ in walkable urban development

The walkability trend is spreading to urbanizing suburbs.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021