flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Supreme Court case likely to have huge impact on Clean Water Act

Regulations

Supreme Court case likely to have huge impact on Clean Water Act

There are substantial implications for developers from the pending ruling.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | May 8, 2023
The U.S. Supreme Court as composed June 30, 2022 to present. Photo: Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States

The Supreme Court as composed June 30, 2022 to present. Front row, left to right: Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., and Associate Justice Elena Kagan. Back row, left to right: Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, Associate Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, and Associate Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Credit: Fred Schilling, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States

A case before the Supreme Court will likely determine how the Clean Water Act is interpreted and the ruling could open up new areas for development within or adjacent to wetlands.

Late last year, the Biden administration issued a new definition of “waters of the United States,” which broadened the numbers of streams and wetlands subject to regulations of the Act. States and national advocacy groups have sued to reverse that provision, and a federal judge has halted it in 24 states.

A case before the Supreme Court, Sackett v. Environmental Protection Agency, may settle the issue. Environmental advocates worry that the justices will gut the Clean Water Act by imposing a narrow reading on what counts as one of the “waters of the United States.”

The court could decide that the federal government doesn’t have authority to protect as many as of half of the country’s wetlands. That action could make many more acres of land nationwide available to developers.

The director of federal water policy at the Natural Resources Defense Council told Grist that the case’s impact is “hard to overstate.” It could make it a “huge problem” to achieve the organization’s water quality goals, he said.

But real estate developers would cheer such an outcome as it would eliminate uncertainty over which areas are subject to the Act, and how they could build on parcels in wetlands areas.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | May 1, 2015

Colorado House kills construction defects bill

The legislation would have made it harder for condo owners to sue builders.

Codes and Standards | May 1, 2015

New energy efficiency program, Tenant Star, gets OK from Congress

The voluntary program for commercial and government buildings is modeled after Energy Star.

Smart Buildings | May 1, 2015

FEMA to require states to evaluate risks posed by climate change

The aim is for states to do a better job planning for natural disasters they are likely to face in a warming world.

Codes and Standards | May 1, 2015

Department of Energy asks for feedback on cost-effectiveness of building energy codes

DOE’s RFI wants input on how to improve methodology on cost assessment.

Codes and Standards | Apr 22, 2015

New York State renews design-build authority

Five state agencies are allowed to use design-build on certain projects.

Codes and Standards | Apr 22, 2015

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 

Codes and Standards | Apr 22, 2015

GBCI renamed Green Business Certification Inc.

The name change reflects the organization’s expanded certification and credentialing services.

Multifamily Housing | Apr 16, 2015

Seattle’s size restriction on micro apartments blamed for rise in rents

Seattle’s city planner recently said that the council’s new rules have made small apartments more expensive to build and charged the board with “overreaching” and not giving micro-housing “a fair shake.”

Green | Apr 16, 2015

New version of Building Energy Data Exchange Specification launched

BEDES is a dictionary that facilitates consistent exchange of building characteristics and energy use data between tools and databases in the building energy efficiency sector.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category

Resiliency

U.S. is reducing floodplain development in most areas

The perception that the U.S. has not been able to curb development in flood-prone areas is mostly inaccurate, according to new research from climate adaptation experts. A national survey of floodplain development between 2001 and 2019 found that fewer structures were built in floodplains than might be expected if cities were building at random.




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021