flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Top 45 Airport Terminal Engineering and E/A Firms

Top 45 Airport Terminal Engineering and E/A Firms

Jacobs surpassed $138 million in 2015 revenue to top BD+C’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest airport terminal engineering and E/A firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.


By BD+C Editors | July 29, 2016
Top 45 Airport Terminal Engineering and E/A Firms

Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport. Photo: Bill Dickinson/Creative Commons.

TOP AIRPORT TERMINAL ENGINEERING
AND E/A FIRMS
Rank Firm 2015 Revenue
1 Jacobs $138,770,000
2 Burns & McDonnell $71,332,857
3 WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff $61,418,000
4 Arup $38,079,330
5 Ghafari Associates $22,500,000
6 Ross & Baruzzini $11,121,605
7 Walter P Moore $7,476,835
8 Woolpert $6,272,452
9 Jensen Hughes $6,023,819
10 Leidos $5,707,000
11 TLC Engineering for Architecture $3,940,727
12 Syska Hennessy Group $2,657,398
13 Thornton Tomasetti $2,644,230
14 Mazzetti $2,116,804
15 Magnusson Klemencic Associates $1,983,956
16 RMF Engineering $1,885,500
17 Affiliated Engineers $1,730,000
18 KJWW / TTG $1,617,989
19 Vanderweil Engineers $1,418,400
20 Newcomb & Boyd $1,211,225
21 Bala Consulting Engineers $1,175,000
22 Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates $1,140,000
23 Graef $1,111,034
24 RDK Engineers $1,053,093
25 Stanley Consultants $967,517
26 Fishbeck, Thompson, Carr & Huber $870,000
27 Architectural Engineers $756,610
28 Environmental Systems Design $523,951
29 Dewberry $426,387
30 dbHMS $384,000
31 Spectrum Engineers $351,472
32 I. C. Thomasson Associates $311,000
33 Wallace Engineering $300,000
34 Highland Associates $250,000
35 KLH Engineers $212,082
36 Benham Design $175,124
37 Glumac $167,921
38 Smith Seckman Reid $147,248
39 P2S Engineering $107,006
40 CTLGroup $100,000
41 Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers $70,570
42 Dunham Associates $50,000
43 JBA Consulting Engineers $43,900
44 Coffman Engineers $34,137
45 STV $33,763
46 Kamm Consulting $32,952
47 Loring Consulting Engineers $14,000
48 Davis, Bowen & Friedel $2,949
49 Cardno Haynes Whaley $1,106

 

RETURN TO THE GIANTS 300 LANDING PAGE

Tags

Related Stories

| May 8, 2012

Morgan/Harbour completes three projects at Columbia Centre

Projects completed on behalf of property owner, White Oak Realty Partners, LLC, Pearlmark Realty Partners, LLC and Angelo Gordon & Co.

| May 7, 2012

BIM in the academy

Lessons for the AEC industry.

| May 7, 2012

4 more trends in higher-education facilities

Our series on college buildings continues with a look at new classroom designs, flexible space, collaboration areas, and the evolving role of the university library.

| May 7, 2012

Best AEC Firms: MHTN Architects nine decades of dedication to Utah

This 65-person design firm has served Salt Lake City and the state of Utah for the better part of 90 years.

| May 7, 2012

2012 BUILDING TEAM AWARDS: TD Ameritrade Park

The new stadium for the College World Series in Omaha combines big-league amenities within a traditional minor league atmosphere.

| May 7, 2012

2012 BUILDING TEAM AWARDS: Fort Belvoir Community Hospital

A new military hospital invokes evidence-based design to create a LEED-certified facility for the nation’s soldiers and their families.

| May 7, 2012

2012 BUILDING TEAM AWARDS: Audie L. Murphy VA Hospital

How a Building Team created a high-tech rehabilitation center for wounded veterans of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.

| May 3, 2012

2012 BUILDING TEAM AWARDS: Rush University Medical Center

This fully integrated Building Team opted for a multi-prime contracting strategy to keep construction going on Chicago’s Rush University Medical Center, despite the economic meltdown.

| May 3, 2012

U of Michigan team looking to create highly efficient building envelope designs

The system combines the use of sensors, novel construction materials, and utility control software in an effort to create technology capable of reducing a building’s carbon footprint.

| May 3, 2012

Best commercial modular buildings and marketing programs recognized

Judges scored entries on architectural excellence, technical innovation, cost effectiveness, energy efficiency, and calendar days to complete.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021