TOP 70 OFFICE ENGINEERING FIRMS | ||
Rank | Firm | 2015 Revenue |
1 | Jacobs | $438,700,000 |
2 | AECOM | $285,000,000 |
3 | Thornton Tomasetti | $108,284,346 |
4 | WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff | $93,672,000 |
5 | Burns & McDonnell | $59,216,746 |
6 | Arup | $55,609,224 |
7 | Syska Hennessy Group | $35,568,928 |
8 | Dewberry | $29,285,538 |
9 | Hankins and Anderson | $25,877,629 |
10 | Benham Design | $18,638,864 |
11 | Environmental Systems Design | $18,338,134 |
12 | Glumac | $16,815,183 |
13 | KJWW / TTG | $15,501,754 |
14 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | $15,350,000 |
15 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | $12,831,847 |
16 | RDK Engineers | $12,490,393 |
17 | Vanderweil Engineers | $11,744,500 |
18 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | $11,031,000 |
19 | Jensen Hughes | $10,470,936 |
20 | GHT Limited | $10,470,000 |
21 | ME Engineers | $7,790,000 |
22 | Henderson Engineers | $7,090,542 |
23 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $6,544,088 |
24 | H.F. Lenz Company | $6,466,407 |
25 | CJL Engineering, Inc. | $6,266,850 |
26 | Bala Consulting Engineers | $5,875,000 |
27 | Highland Associates | $5,600,000 |
28 | Shive-Hattery | $5,393,049 |
29 | Walter P Moore | $5,365,243 |
30 | Cardno Haynes Whaley | $5,210,293 |
31 | Hixson Architecture, Engineering, Interiors | $5,200,000 |
32 | Newcomb & Boyd | $4,875,555 |
33 | KCI Technologies | $4,700,000 |
34 | Pedco E & A Services | $4,250,000 |
35 | Ghafari Associates | $4,000,000 |
36 | KZF Design | $3,837,266 |
37 | Interface Engineering | $3,625,951 |
38 | Heapy Engineering | $3,312,190 |
39 | Loring Consulting Engineers | $3,300,000 |
40 | Wendel | $3,288,770 |
41 | Dunham Associates | $3,250,000 |
42 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $3,193,435 |
43 | Luckett & Farley | $3,082,431 |
44 | DeSimone Consulting Engineers | $3,052,614 |
45 | Spectrum Engineers | $2,951,130 |
46 | OLA Consulting Engineers | $2,730,338 |
47 | Smith Seckman Reid | $2,629,255 |
48 | ThermalTech Engineering | $2,500,000 |
49 | Walker Parking Consultants | $2,495,000 |
50 | Primera Engineers | $2,390,551 |
51 | Affiliated Engineers | $2,360,000 |
52 | Coffman Engineers | $2,315,629 |
53 | KLH Engineers | $2,313,645 |
54 | I. C. Thomasson Associates | $2,177,000 |
55 | Baird, Hampton & Brown | $2,141,785 |
56 | Wick Fisher White | $2,120,000 |
57 | Kamm Consulting | $2,090,195 |
58 | Karpinski Engineering | $2,000,000 |
59 | Core States Group | $1,964,317 |
60 | CTLGroup | $1,900,000 |
61 | Mazzetti | $1,624,541 |
62 | JQ Engineering | $1,575,300 |
63 | SSOE Group | $1,450,000 |
64 | Graef | $1,355,627 |
65 | Davis, Bowen & Friedel | $1,296,783 |
66 | Peter Basso Associates | $1,231,603 |
67 | M/E Engineering | $1,172,089 |
68 | William Tao & Associates | $1,072,324 |
69 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | $1,000,000 |
70 | RMF Engineering | $921,800 |
71 | JBA Consulting Engineers | $865,525 |
72 | Stanley Consultants | $768,109 |
73 | dbHMS | $768,000 |
74 | G & W Engineering Corp. | $650,167 |
75 | Wallace Engineering | $600,000 |
76 | BR+A Consulting Engineers | $600,000 |
RETURN TO THE GIANTS 300 LANDING PAGE
Related Stories
| Aug 11, 2010
M&A deal volume down 67% in engineering/construction sector: PricewaterhouseCoopers
Global Economic Uncertainty Results in Sluggish Deal Activity in U.S.; China Shows Significant Opportunity for Growth
| Aug 11, 2010
ZweigWhite names its fastest-growing architecture, engineering, and environmental firms
Management consulting and research firm ZweigWhite has identified the 200 fastest-growing architecture, engineering, and environmental consulting firms in the U.S. and Canada for its annual ranking, The Zweig Letter Hot Firm List. This annual list features the design and environmental firms that have outperformed the economy and competitors to become industry leaders.
| Aug 11, 2010
SSOE, Fluor among nation's largest industrial building design firms
A ranking of the Top 75 Industrial Design Firms based on Building Design+Construction's 2009 Giants 300 survey. For more Giants 300 rankings, visit http://www.BDCnetwork.com/Giants
| Aug 11, 2010
Best AEC Firms of 2011/12
Later this year, we will launch Best AEC Firms 2012. We’re looking for firms that create truly positive workplaces for their AEC professionals and support staff. Keep an eye on this page for entry information. +
| Aug 11, 2010
Report: Building codes and regulations impede progress toward uber-green buildings
The enthusiasm for super green Living Buildings continues unabated, but a key stumbling block to the growth of this highest level of green building performance is an existing set of codes and regulations. A new report by the Cascadia Region Green Building Council entitled "Code, Regulatory and Systemic Barriers Affecting Living Building Projects" presents a case for fundamental reassessment of building codes.
| Aug 11, 2010
Call for entries: Building enclosure design awards
The Boston Society of Architects and the Boston chapter of the Building Enclosure Council (BEC-Boston) have announced a High Performance Building award that will assess building enclosure innovation through the demonstrated design, construction, and operation of the building enclosure.
| Aug 11, 2010
Portland Cement Association offers blast resistant design guide for reinforced concrete structures
Developed for designers and engineers, "Blast Resistant Design Guide for Reinforced Concrete Structures" provides a practical treatment of the design of cast-in-place reinforced concrete structures to resist the effects of blast loads. It explains the principles of blast-resistant design, and how to determine the kind and degree of resistance a structure needs as well as how to specify the required materials and details.
| Aug 11, 2010
ACSA announces 2008-2009 ACSA/AISC steel design student competition winners
The Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture (ACSA) is pleased to announce the winners of the ninth annual steel design student competition for the 2008-2009 academic year. Administered by the Association of Collegiate Schools of Architecture (ACSA) and sponsored by the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC), the program challenged students, working individually or in teams, to explore a variety of design issues related to the use of steel in design and construction.