flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Top BIM Engineering Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

Top BIM Engineering Firms [2013 Giants 300 Report]

Jacobs, URS, SAIC top Building Design+Construction's 2013 ranking of the engineering and engineering/architecture firms with the most revenue from BIM-driven projects.


By BD+C Staff | July 19, 2013
Courtesy SmithGroup
Courtesy SmithGroup
Rank Company 2012 BIM Revenue ($)
1 Jacobs Engineering Group $4,465,746,000
2 URS Corp. $292,864,749
3 Science Applications International Corp. $131,066,235
4 Arup $123,364,028
5 Merrick & Co. $106,000,000
6 SSOE Group $99,560,561
7 Thornton Tomasetti $93,431,545
8 Buro Happold Consulting Engineers $78,006,000
9 Middough $60,000,000
9 KPFF Consulting Engineers $60,000,000
11 KJWW Engineering Consultants $51,092,154
12 Clark Nexsen $37,364,300
13 Vanderweil Engineers $32,858,900
14 Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers $32,000,000
15 Magnusson Klemencic Associates $31,843,000
16 Henderson Engineers $31,742,887
17 Glumac $30,116,000
18 Walter P Moore $29,092,693
19 Affiliated Engineers $28,907,000
20 M-E Engineers $28,500,000
21 H&A Architects & Engineers $27,734,657
22 Michael Baker Jr. $25,900,000
23 Degenkolb Engineers $23,647,736
24 TLC Engineering for Architecture $22,700,613
25 Heapy Engineering $21,674,602
26 STV $21,051,000
27 Haynes Whaley Associates $19,740,185
28 CCRD Partners $19,000,000
29 TTG $18,395,200
30 Syska Hennessy Group $18,015,883
31 Smith Seckman Reid $18,000,000
32 Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor $15,200,000
33 Environmental Systems Design $14,338,994
34 GRAEF $12,600,000
35 Interface Engineering $10,772,782
36 BRPH $10,136,212
37 Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering $8,000,000
37 Barge, Waggoner, Sumner and Cannon $8,000,000
39 M/E Engineering $7,500,000
40 Newcomb & Boyd $6,331,085
41 Dunham Associates $6,000,000
42 Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers $5,735,421
43 Bergmann Associates $5,500,000
43 Simpson Gumpertz & Heger $5,500,000
45 Dewberry $5,412,709
46 CJL Engineering $5,197,143
47 Peter Basso Associates $5,000,000
48 Zak Companies $4,543,488
49 H.F. Lenz $4,050,000
50 Wallace Engineering $4,000,000
50 Hixson Architecture, Engineering, Interiors $4,000,000
52 KLH Engineers $3,518,208
53 Coffman Engineers $3,000,000
54 Ross & Baruzzini $2,407,000
55 Sparling $2,156,592
56 Wick Fisher White $2,113,000
57 AKF Group $2,000,000
58 RDK Engineers $1,985,000
59 GHT Limited $1,600,000
60 P2S Engineering $1,452,000
61 RMF Engineering Design $1,250,000
62 Brinjac Engineering $1,224,543
63 Aon Fire Protection Engineering $1,000,000
64 Mazzetti $714,544
65 ThermalTech Engineering $500,000
66 FBA Engineering $500,000
67 GRW $462,300
68 Bala Consulting Engineers $400,000
69 Primera Engineers $393,000
70 Walker Parking Consultants $380,361
71 Apogee Consulting Group $309,000
72 KCI Technologies $255,000
73 Kamm Consulting $113,494
74 Allen & Shariff $112,000
75 G&W Engineering $60,000

 

Back to BIM Giants article

 

Read the full 2013 Giants 300 Report

Related Stories

| Oct 4, 2013

Sydney to get world's tallest 'living' façade

The One Central Park Tower development consists of two, 380-foot-tall towers covered in a series of living walls and vertical gardens that will extend the full height of the buildings. 

| Oct 4, 2013

Nifty video shows planned development of La Sagrada Familia basilica

After 144 years, construction on Gaudi's iconic Barcelona edifice is picking up speed, with a projected end date of 2026. 

| Oct 4, 2013

Mack Urban, AECOM acquire six acres for development in LA's South Park district

Mack Urban and AECOM Capital, the investment fund of AECOM Technology Corporation (NYSE: ACM), have acquired six acres of land in downtown Los Angeles’ South Park district located in the central business district (CBD). 

| Oct 4, 2013

CRB opens Atlanta office

Georgia’s status as a burgeoning hub for the life sciences industry has fueled CRB’s decision to open an office in Atlanta to better serve its clients in the market. CRB is a leading provider of engineering, design and construction services for customers in the biotech, pharmaceutical and life sciences industries. 

| Sep 27, 2013

NYC releases first year-to-year energy performance data on commercial properties

A new report provides information on energy performance of New York City's largest buildings (mostly commercial, multi-family residential). It provides an analysis of 2011 data from city-required energy “benchmarking”—or the tracking and comparison of energy performance—in more than 24,000 buildings that are over 50,000 square feet.

| Sep 27, 2013

ASHRAE/IES publish first standard focused on commissioning process

ANSI/ASHRAE/IES Standard 202, Commissioning Process for Buildings and Systems, identifies the minimum acceptable commissioning process for buildings and systems as described in ASHRAE’s Guideline 0-2005, The Commissioning Process. Standard 202 is ASHRAE’s first standard focused on the commissioning process.

| Sep 26, 2013

6 ways to maximize home-field advantage in sports venue design

Home-field advantage can play a significant role in game outcomes. Here are ways AEC firms can help create the conditions that draw big crowds, energize the home team to perform better, and disrupt visiting players.

| Sep 26, 2013

Literature review affirms benefits of daylighting, architectural glazing

The use of glass as a building material positively impacts learning, healing, productivity and well-being, according to a white paper published by Guardian Industries and the University of Michigan Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning. The findings highlight the significant influence daylighting and outside views have on employees, workers, students, consumers and patients.

| Sep 26, 2013

Mobilizing your job site to achieve a paperless project: fact or fiction?

True mobility in the field has rapidly evolved from lock-box kiosks on each floor to laptops on rolling carts to tablets and iPads loaded with drawings sets stored in the cloud. And WiFi-ready job sites have gone from “nice to have” to “must have” status in just a little over a year.

| Sep 26, 2013

Leading in the face of change

As AEC firms navigate toward an uncertain future, the most effective leaders are those who eagerly adapt to change. Here are three attitudes that drive leaders who are of most value to their firms.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Urban Planning

Bridging the gap: How early architect involvement can revolutionize a city’s capital improvement plans

Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) typically span three to five years and outline future city projects and their costs. While they set the stage, the design and construction of these projects often extend beyond the CIP window, leading to a disconnect between the initial budget and evolving project scope. This can result in financial shortfalls, forcing cities to cut back on critical project features.



Libraries

Reasons to reinvent the Midcentury academic library

DLR Group's Interior Design Leader Gretchen Holy, Assoc. IIDA, shares the idea that a designer's responsibility to embrace a library’s history, respect its past, and create an environment that will serve student populations for the next 100 years.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021