Rank | Company | 2012 Total Revenue ($) |
1 | Fluor | $221,231,200 |
2 | Arup | $149,738,587 |
3 | Affiliated Engineers | $105,503,000 |
4 | WSP USA | $105,362,352 |
5 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | $91,000,000 |
6 | Syska Hennessy Group | $82,097,502 |
7 | Henderson Engineers | $63,485,775 |
8 | Smith Seckman Reid | $52,919,312 |
9 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | $51,092,154 |
10 | Vanderweil Engineers | $50,552,200 |
11 | TTG | $49,968,167 |
12 | Glumac | $47,967,000 |
13 | Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers | $41,500,000 |
14 | Rolf Jensen & Associates | $40,000,000 |
15 | Coffman Engineers | $39,100,000 |
16 | Environmental Systems Design | $38,763,000 |
17 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | $37,462,767 |
18 | M-E Engineers | $35,400,000 |
19 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | $34,295,957 |
20 | RMF Engineering Design | $32,300,000 |
21 | RDK Engineers | $31,201,000 |
22 | Walter P Moore | $29,092,693 |
23 | H.F. Lenz | $26,991,500 |
24 | Interface Engineering | $25,193,936 |
25 | Degenkolb Engineers | $25,127,432 |
26 | CCRD Partners | 25,100,000 |
27 | Mazzetti | 24,895,804 |
28 | Robins & Morton | 24,500,000 |
29 | M/E Engineering | 22,687,000 |
30 | Aon Fire Protection Engineering | 22,510,728 |
31 | Heapy Engineering | 22,116,941 |
32 | Sparling | 20,282,073 |
33 | Haynes Whaley Associates | 19,907,949 |
34 | Newcomb & Boyd | 18,617,195 |
35 | KCI Technologies | 18,032,000 |
36 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | 16,868,884 |
37 | GHT Limited | 16,834,469 |
38 | Bala Consulting Engineers | 16,430,000 |
39 | French & Parrello Associates | 15,903,300 |
40 | ThermalTech Engineering | 15,500,000 |
41 | Joseph R. Loring & Associates | 15,000,000 |
42 | KLH Engineers | 14,072,830 |
43 | Dunham Associates | 14,000,000 |
44 | Wallace Engineering | 13,350,000 |
45 | P2S Engineering | 12,962,044 |
46 | Karpinski Engineering | 12,076,943 |
47 | Peter Basso Associates | 11,016,000 |
48 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | 9,300,000 |
49 | CTLGroup | 9,000,000 |
50 | Allen & Shariff | 8,500,000 |
51 | Wick Fisher White | 8,126,951 |
52 | Brinjac Engineering | 6,890,645 |
53 | OLA Consulting Engineers | 5,500,000 |
54 | Eaton Energy Solutions | 4,430,095 |
55 | Kamm Consulting | 3,681,775 |
56 | FBA Engineering | 3,360,000 |
57 | Apogee Consulting Group | 3,331,300 |
58 | G&W Engineering | 2,408,800 |
59 | Total Building Commissioning | 616,878 |
60 | Yates Cos., The | 400,000 |
61 | Weis Builders | 300,000 |
Related Stories
| May 8, 2012
Morgan/Harbour completes three projects at Columbia Centre
Projects completed on behalf of property owner, White Oak Realty Partners, LLC, Pearlmark Realty Partners, LLC and Angelo Gordon & Co.
| May 7, 2012
4 more trends in higher-education facilities
Our series on college buildings continues with a look at new classroom designs, flexible space, collaboration areas, and the evolving role of the university library.
| May 7, 2012
Best AEC Firms: MHTN Architects nine decades of dedication to Utah
This 65-person design firm has served Salt Lake City and the state of Utah for the better part of 90 years.
| May 7, 2012
2012 BUILDING TEAM AWARDS: TD Ameritrade Park
The new stadium for the College World Series in Omaha combines big-league amenities within a traditional minor league atmosphere.
| May 7, 2012
2012 BUILDING TEAM AWARDS: Fort Belvoir Community Hospital
A new military hospital invokes evidence-based design to create a LEED-certified facility for the nation’s soldiers and their families.
| May 7, 2012
2012 BUILDING TEAM AWARDS: Audie L. Murphy VA Hospital
How a Building Team created a high-tech rehabilitation center for wounded veterans of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
| May 3, 2012
2012 BUILDING TEAM AWARDS: Rush University Medical Center
This fully integrated Building Team opted for a multi-prime contracting strategy to keep construction going on Chicago’s Rush University Medical Center, despite the economic meltdown.
| May 3, 2012
U of Michigan team looking to create highly efficient building envelope designs
The system combines the use of sensors, novel construction materials, and utility control software in an effort to create technology capable of reducing a building’s carbon footprint.
| May 3, 2012
Best commercial modular buildings and marketing programs recognized
Judges scored entries on architectural excellence, technical innovation, cost effectiveness, energy efficiency, and calendar days to complete.