flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Traditional lab design doesn't address neurodiverse needs, study finds

Laboratories

Traditional lab design doesn't address neurodiverse needs, study finds

Nearly 50% of survey respondents who work in laboratory settings identified as neurodivergent. Without inclusive laboratory designs, the scientific research profession risks reduced productivity, burnout, and recruitment and retention challenges.


By HOK | September 27, 2024
Serious concentrated female microbiologist in sterile clothing and safety goggles sitting at table and dropping reagent in petri dish while doing research in laboratory
Photo courtesy Adobe Stock

A groundbreaking study conducted by ARC – Advanced Research Clusters, HOK, and the University of the West of Scotland (UWS), has revealed that half (48.1%) of all survey respondents who work in laboratory settings identify as neurodivergent, more than double the global average (20%) and more than a quarter (25.5%) identify as autistic, twenty-five times the UK average (1%). Because of this, spaces designed to foster technological and scientific innovation are inadvertently stifling the potential of the brilliant minds working within them by not addressing the sensory processing needs of the occupants.

To date, there has been a dearth of research into creating inclusive scientific spaces. Focused on science and technology innovators in laboratory settings, this study aimed to identify how individuals respond to sensory stimulation in current lab designs. It revealed how neurodivergent individuals are particularly sensitive to auditory, visual and tactile elements, exposing that many existing laboratories are not designed to address these needs holistically. These sensory distractions are linked to cognitive interruptions such as loss of focus and a disruption of creativity and innovation, which directly impacts employee engagement, satisfaction, and productivity.

The study also revealed that a third (29.9%) of the next generation of innovators consider themselves neurotypical. Without inclusive laboratory designs, the scientific research profession risks undermining these brilliant minds, leading to reduced productivity, poor recall, burnout, stress and recruitment and retention challenges.

Results for Designing Neuroinclusive Laboratory Environments

Dr. Edward Edgerton from UWS said: “Often, neurodivergent employees will manage their work environments by hiding signs of their neurodiversity. However, even when their neurodiversity is recognized, their workplaces can still be exhausting, impacting negatively on their performance and wellbeing. Few organizations have considered neurodiversity workspace design particularly for laboratories.”

ARC supports over 300 science and tech organizations and over 10,000 innovators. The anonymised study included lab-based users from ARC’s network, including the renowned Harwell Science Campus, science departments at the University of Oxford and participants from selected European science campuses.

HOK, a leading global architecture firm that specializes in designing neuroinclusive spaces, partnered with ARC and UWS for the research. The team explored ways to identify sensory preferences and challenges and to develop design principles critical to the performance, sense of belonging and overall satisfaction of the people using laboratory spaces. Studies have shown that spaces that support diverse thinking enhance creativity and innovation by 20 percent.

Kay Sargent, HOK’s director of thought leadership, interiors, said: “You don’t have to be neurodivergent to be annoyed by sound, temperature, or light. But what might be annoying for someone who is neurotypical might be debilitating to someone with ADHD, autism, or other neurodivergence. It’s about making spaces more functional for 100% of the people. By creating neuro-flexible spaces, we’re enabling some of the world’s brightest minds to come together, allowing super-creative people to find their own personal, comfortable space.”

Design Strategies for Neurodiverse Laboratories

Design strategies identified by HOK that should be implemented in future laboratory developments include: providing individuals with choices, the right level of sound and auditory controls to support specific tasks, creating spaces with access to natural daylight and biophilic elements, reducing visual clutter, having adjustable ergonomic furniture, incorporating areas within the lab to retreat or reset, and introducing collaborative areas and spaces for doodling.

Jenny Gardner, ARC’s development director said: “At ARC, we understand the importance of creating spaces that support our members in solving the world’s greatest challenges. Until now the industry has failed to address the needs and experiences of neurodiverse individuals, prioritizing sterile, modern looks and open-plan co-working spaces without areas to decompress. We’re committed to changing this by designing inclusive scientific spaces that enable our members to deliver life-changing science.”

Daisy Shearer, a Quantum physicist and neurodiversity advocate, said: "Ensuring scientific workspaces are designed with neuro-inclusion in mind is an often-overlooked aspect to accessibility and the EDI conversation. It's great to see these discussions happening around neurodiversity at ARC, so we can create inclusive spaces where all neurotypes can thrive. Good research and innovation stems from those who work on it, ensuring a diverse group of people can access these careers is key."

Download the full report here.

Related Stories

Healthcare Facilities | Jan 7, 2024

Two new projects could be economic catalysts for a central New Jersey city

A Cancer Center and Innovation district are under construction and expected to start opening in 2025 in New Brunswick.

Laboratories | Jan 5, 2024

Office conversions are helping to meet the growing demand for life-science space

Ware Malcomb and Rock Creek Property Group led the team that recently completed the adaptive reuse of two office buildings in Maryland.

Mass Timber | Jan 2, 2024

5 ways mass timber will reshape the design of life sciences facilities

Here are five reasons why it has become increasingly evident that mass timber is ready to shape the future of laboratory spaces. 

Giants 400 | Nov 28, 2023

Top 55 Laboratory Construction Firms for 2023

Whiting-Turner, DPR Construction, STO Building Group, Skanska, and Hensel Phelps top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest laboratory general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Nov 28, 2023

Top 60 Laboratory Engineering Firms for 2023

Jacobs, Affiliated Engineers, Burns & McDonnell, Tetra Tech, and WSP head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest laboratory engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Nov 28, 2023

Top 100 Laboratory Design Firms for 2023

HDR, Flad Architects, DGA, Elkus Manfredi Architects, and Gensler top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest laboratory architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.

Giants 400 | Nov 16, 2023

Top 80 Science + Technology Facility Construction Firms for 2023

DPR Construction, Austin Industries, Whiting-Turner, and Gilbane top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking factors revenue from all science and technology (S+T) buildings work, including laboratories, research buildings, technology/innovation buildings, pharmaceutical production facilities, and semiconductor production facilities.

Giants 400 | Nov 16, 2023

Top 70 Science + Technology Facility Engineering Firms for 2023

Jacobs, Fluor, SSOE, Tetra Tech, and Affiliated Engineers head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking factors revenue from all science and technology (S+T) buildings work, including laboratories, research buildings, technology/innovation buildings, pharmaceutical production facilities, and semiconductor production facilities.

Giants 400 | Nov 16, 2023

Top 100 Science + Technology Facility Architecture Firms for 2023

Gensler, HDR, Page Southerland Page, Flad Architects, and DGA top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking factors revenue from all science and technology (S+T) buildings work, including laboratories, research buildings, technology/innovation buildings, pharmaceutical production facilities, and semiconductor production facilities.

Laboratories | Nov 8, 2023

Boston’s FORUM building to support cutting-edge life sciences research and development

Global real estate companies Lendlease and Ivanhoé Cambridge recently announced the topping-out of FORUM, a nine-story, 350,000-sf life science building in Boston. Located in Boston Landing, a 15-acre mixed-use community, the $545 million project will achieve operational net zero carbon upon completion in 2024.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021