Environmentally-sustainable, or “Green,” buildings continue to be firmly on the agenda for real estate owners, developers and corporate owner-occupants. Almost all respondents to the Turner 2010 Green Building Market Barometer expect to incorporate at least some Green features in their next construction project. The potential to reduce energy and operating expenses are the most common drivers for building Green, although many companies are also focused on a broader set of benefits such as increased health and well-being of occupants and the positive impact on brand and corporate reputation. Yet, concerns persist over perceived higher construction costs and the length of the payback period. In addition, respondents continue to look closely at the cost and perceived difficulty of LEED certification.
These are some of the key findings from The Turner Construction Company 2010 Green Building Market Barometer, which is the fifth assessment since 2004 of perceptions about sustainable construction. The 2010 survey gathered the views on Green buildings of 681 executives from a broad range of organizations involved with real estate, including real estate owners, developers and corporate space users, as well as architectural, engineering and construction firms.
The survey polled the participants on the likelihood of undertaking construction or renovation projects; the degree to which companies incorporate Green building features; how companies decide whether to incorporate Green features; and the role of the LEED Green Building Rating system. In addition, for the first time, the survey asked about the extent of commitment to sustainable practices, in general, across organizations.
Key Findings:
Many Companies Expect to Undertake Construction or Renovation Projects
- Among real estate owners, developers, and corporate owner-occupants, 46% of executives said it was extremely or very likely that they would undertake new construction over the next 12 months, while 58% anticipated undertaking a renovation project.
Most Anticipate Incorporating Green Features
- Almost 90% of those executives said it was extremely or very likely that they would incorporate energy efficiency improvements in their new construction or renovation project, while roughly 60% expected to incorporate improvements to water efficiency, indoor environmental quality, and Green materials.
Financial Considerations Most important
- The factors most often rated as extremely or very important when companies decide whether to incorporate Green features were energy efficiency (88%) and ongoing operations and maintenance costs (86%).
- Many companies also considered non-financial factors to be extremely or very important in their decisions to incorporate Green features such as indoor air quality (72%), health and well-being of occupants (72%), and the impact on brand/reputation (67%).
- A payback period of longer than five years for Green features was considered acceptable by 45% % of executives.
Long Payback Period and Higher Construction Costs Pose Obstacles
- Despite the fact that almost half the executives were willing to accept a payback period of longer than five years, roughly two thirds of executives considered the perceived length of the payback period to be an extremely or very significant obstacle to incorporating Green features.
- Roughly two thirds of executives also considered higher construction costs to be an important obstacle to the development of additional Green buildings.
- Half of the executives believed that Green buildings have higher operating and maintenance costs, which they identified as another extremely or very significant obstacle to Green construction.
Views of LEED Certification
- Fifty-three percent of the executives thought it was extremely or very likely that their companies would seek LEED certification if constructing a Green building.
- Executives from real estate owners and corporations with portfolios of one million square feet or more were more likely to seek LEED certification, with 64% saying it was extremely or very likely.
Broad Commitment to Sustainable Practices
- Ninety percent of executives said their companies were at least somewhat committed to following environmentally sustainable practices in areas beyond their real estate portfolios, including 56% of executives who said they were extremely or very committed.
- The reasons most often cited as extremely or very important for companies to commit to following sustainable practices were two financial factors—cost savings (64%) and customer requirements (59%)—and two non-financial factors—impact on brand/reputation (64%) and the belief that “it’s the right thing to do” (63%).
Almost all executives continue to consider incorporating Green features when they undertake a construction or renovation project. Energy efficiency measures were the features that executives would most frequently incorporate in their projects. Investments in improving energy efficiency in their buildings result in substantial savings through lower energy costs and reduced operations and maintenance costs. In addition, most executives would also include Green building features to improve water efficiency and indoor air quality and would employ the use of green materials in their projects. These Green building features provide a wide array of additional benefits that include more satisfied employees, improved health and well-being of occupants, and the positive impact on a company’s corporate brand and reputation.
Despite Economic Conditions, Many Owners Planning to Build
Turner’s 2010 Green Building Survey was conducted in an environment of continuing weakness in the economy, following the financial crisis and economic downturn that began in 2008. Despite these market conditions, when asked about their likelihood to undertake new construction or renovation projects over the next 12 months, many executives who worked for real estate owners, developers, or corporate owner-occupants indicated that they expected to do so. Among these executives, 46% thought it was extremely or very likely that their company would undertake new construction over the coming year, while 58% thought it was likely they would undertake a renovation project. Real estate owners and corporate owner-occupants with real estate portfolios of one million square feet or more were even more likely to anticipate undertaking projects over the next 12 months, with 52% saying they were extremely or very likely to undertake new construction and 73% saying the same about renovation projects.
Related Stories
| Jan 21, 2011
Harlem facility combines social services with retail, office space
Harlem is one of the first neighborhoods in New York City to combine retail with assisted living. The six-story, 50,000-sf building provides assisted living for residents with disabilities and a nonprofit group offering services to minority groups, plus retail and office space.
| Jan 21, 2011
Nothing dinky about these residences for Golden Gophers
The Sydney Hall Student Apartments combines 125 student residences with 15,000 sf of retail space in the University of Minnesota’s historic Dinkytown neighborhood, in Minneapolis.
| Jan 21, 2011
Revamped hotel-turned-condominium building holds on to historic style
The historic 89,000-sf Hotel Stowell in Los Angeles was reincarnated as the El Dorado, a 65-unit loft condominium building with retail and restaurant space. Rockefeller Partners Architects, El Segundo, Calif., aimed to preserve the building’s Gothic-Art Nouveau combination style while updating it for modern living.
| Jan 21, 2011
Sustainable history center exhibits Fort Ticonderoga’s storied past
Fort Ticonderoga, in Ticonderoga, N.Y., along Lake Champlain, dates to 1755 and was the site of battles in the French and Indian War and the American Revolution. The new $20.8 million, 15,000-sf Deborah Clarke Mars Education Center pays homage to the French magasin du Roi (the King’s warehouse) at the fort.
| Jan 21, 2011
Library planned for modern media enthusiasts
The England Run Library, a new 30,000-sf glass, brick, and stone building, will soon house more than 100,000 books and DVDs. The Lukmire Partnership, Arlington, Va., designed the Stafford County, Va., library, the firm’s fourth for the Central Rappahannock Library System, to combine modern library-browsing trends with traditional library services.
| Jan 21, 2011
Virginia community college completes LEED Silver science building
The new 60,000-sf science building at John Tyler Community College in Midlothian, Va., just earned LEED Silver, the first facility in the Commonwealth’s community college system to earn this recognition. The facility, designed by Burt Hill with Gilbane Building Co. as construction manager, houses an entire floor of laboratory classrooms, plus a new library, student lounge, and bookstore.
| Jan 21, 2011
Upscale apartments offer residents a twist on modern history
The Goodwynn at Town: Brookhaven, a 433,300-sf residential and retail building in DeKalb County, Ga., combines a historic look with modern amenities. Atlanta-based project architect Niles Bolton Associates used contemporary materials in historic patterns and colors on the exterior, while concealing a six-level parking structure on the interior.
| Jan 21, 2011
Research center built for interdisciplinary cooperation
The Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute at Texas Children’s Hospital, in Houston, the first basic research institute for childhood neurological diseases, is a 13-story twisting tower in the center of the hospital campus.
| Jan 21, 2011
Music festival’s new home showcases scenic setting
Epstein Joslin Architects, Cambridge, Mass., designed the Shalin Liu Performance Center in Rockport, Mass., to showcase the Rockport Chamber Music Festival, as well at the site’s ocean views.
| Jan 21, 2011
GSA Recognizes the Best in Public Architecture
The U.S. General Services Administration recognized the best in public architecture and civilian federal workplaces at the 2010 GSA Design Awards in Washington, D.C. This year's 11 award winners showcase the federal government's commitment to cutting-edge architectural design and its focus on sustainability.
