Raised flooring was introduced years ago for use in data centers, where the ability to easily move power and data cabling under the floor was a big plus. At the time, it was not unusual for raised floors to have less than a solid feel; this was chiefly due to thin floor panel material, which often resulted in a squeaky, hollow sound as occupants walked on the floor. Contractors were not accustomed to the demands of raised-floor construction, leading to poor performance.
Today, general contractors and subcontractors have the know-how to install these systems to high standards. Properly installed, raised flooring feels as sturdy as any other flooring, and underfloor air distribution (UFAD), often combined with air displacement ventilation, is gaining acceptance among building owners and designers. “Ten or twelve years ago, UFAD was perceived as risky, but not anymore,” says David Atwood, general manager of Boston-based contractor Integrated Interiors. “On major gut rehabs or new construction, it is getting more consideration than we’ve ever seen.” (Note: For the purposes of this article, “UFAD” is used interchangeably with “underfloor air displacement ventilation.”)
APPLICATION IN NUMEROUS BUILDING TYPES
The UFAD technology’s multiple advantages make it an increasingly popular choice for a variety of building types, including offices, schools, college classrooms, libraries, casinos, and, of course, data centers.
UFAD can help reduce the amount of construction materials used in a project, particularly on high-rise projects. Unlike overhead HVAC, underfloor heating and cooling uses little ductwork, so the amount of sheet metal used is greatly reduced. Moreover, the elimination of overhead ducts means plenum heights can be reduced by six inches or more per floor. “We have modeled an 11-story building, and it gained an entire floor from the reduced plenum heights,” Atwood says. The savings on structural steel, envelope elements, and curtain wall materials adds up as building height increases.
One of the most important benefits of raised floor systems is that they can easily be reconfigured by moving floor tiles and diffusers to different locations, and cabling can be accessed and moved easily under the floor. As a result, maintenance staff can rearrange workstations for new tenants without drilling holes and disassembling portions of the ceiling. In an office building with high tenant turnover, the resulting savings in labor costs over the years can be considerable. And because floor outlets are easy tomove, there’s no need to buy cubicles with power outlets, which cost considerably more than nonpowered units.
UFAD systems use much lower static air pressure to heat or cool a space than conventional overhead HVAC systems. Thus, the power needed to run fans is reduced, thereby saving energy. Some UFAD manufacturers claim that total HVAC power savings can be as much as 20-30% compared with overhead systems, but that’s probably overstating the case, according to Tom Webster, research specialist with the Center for the Built Environment at the University of California, Berkeley. He says that, in a typical office environment, the CBE has measured HVAC energy savings from UFAD systems in the 10-15% range under ideal conditions using currently available technology. Still, 10-15% energy savings is nothing to sneeze at.
However, Webster cautions that because no two buildings are alike, it is extremely difficult to compare the energy use of an overhead system with a UFAD system. Variables such as climate, ceiling height, system configuration, and the presence of other energy-conserving elements in the building complicate the equation. One thing is clear, says Webster: cooling climates will reap higher energy savings than heating climates from UFAD.
With some tweaking, it is possible to improve UFAD energy performance, Webster adds. If diffusers are positioned just right on the floor, and if occupants and maintenance staff adjust the diffusers properly—actions more honored in the breach than in the observance—greater energy savings can be realized.
UFAD systems may also contribute to improved thermal comfort and air quality. Surveys have shown a higher rate of satisfaction when occupants have more control over heating and cooling of their individual spaces, and some studies have found improved productivity in UFAD buildings. One reason: lower static air pressure means much less air mixing compared with overhead systems. Thus, when someone sneezes, germs don’t travel as far as they would in an overhead system. That’s one reason that UFAD can contribute to a LEED credit for indoor air quality.
FIRST COST VS. LIFE CYCLE COST
The question of first cost vs. life cycle cost for UFAD systems is somewhat controversial and depends on what assumptions are being made. UC Berkeley’s Center for the Built Environment says that its baseline assumptions yielded a cost premium of $3.50/gsf between the median UFAD system and the baseline overhead system. In cases where the owner or designer calls for a raised floor to make moving cabling and power lines easier, however, installing UFAD may prove less costly than going overhead, according to the CBE’s Webster. When all cost factors are accounted for over the life of a building, it is possible for UFAD to come out ahead in total cost of ownership. But, again, it depends a lot on the assumptions that have gone into the calculation.
It is also the case that, with the exception of total gut renovation projects, underfloor air distribution systems are usually cost-prohibitive for reconstruction projects. Perhaps the biggest possible downside to the technology, though, is that improper installation will reduce system efficiency, raise energy costs, and reduce thermal comfort for occupants. While it doesn’t take a genius to install UFAD correctly, it does mean that general contractors and the building trades must pay attention to the details.
Here, according to experts consulted for this article, are a number of factors to keep in mind when employing underfloor air distribution systems in your projects.
KEYS TO PROPER UFAD INSTALLATION
Proper installation of UFAD systems requires attention to detail, rigorous scheduling, and job site cleanliness—all responsibilities that fall primarily on the general contractor, who must educate all the members of the Building Team and ensure that the certain critical factors are addressed.
Develop an efficient layout. Projects that don’t take this crucial first step may run into interface conflicts and poor coordination among the trades. Here’s where BIM/3D models may streamline the process.
Finish the overhead work first. Coordinate construction trades to get most overhead work out of the way as early as possible. Scissor lifts, staging, and ladders all pose a safety risk when working around exposed floor openings.
Educate your subcontractors. Subcontractors must understand that they are working in areas that will become part of the air delivery system. Work cleanliness and the proper sealing of all penetrations are essential to whole building performance.
Get the flooring team in early. Flooring teams should be involved right after the concrete slab is poured. Most floor plans for UFAD projects incorporate a blend of raised flooring and conventional concrete slabs. Merging a raised flooring system with a fixed concrete slab requires a thorough survey and tactical benchmarking. The slab may directly meet the raised floor around the building core, such as near the elevators, and concrete may have to be ground down to provide an even seam.
Draw a map. Mark out a dot grid with spray paint on the slab to identify where pedestal bases are to be located within the floor plate. Skipping this step can lead to installation conflicts. “You don’t want to locate diffusers under a piece of furniture,” warns Scott Alwine, LEED AP, with Tate Access Floors, Jessup, Md.
Position cutouts and power service correctly. After studying the floor plate design and furniture layout, the team must maintain close communication with the panel manufacturer so that cutouts, where power and data lines will enter, are properly located. With floor panels installed, electrical and mechanical trades can install service boxes with power and data cabling guided through pre-cut openings in floor panels.
Eliminate gaps in the floor. Rigorous quality controls should be in place to ensure that there are no gaps in the underfloor air plenum. “You have to make sure everything under the floor is sealed,” Alwine says. “That includes utility closets, where cabling comes through the floor, where the floor meets the elevator, and around columns.”
Make sure the final layer of flooring is perfect. There are many choices of finishes on raised floor tiles, including terrazzo and synthetic materials, but carpet tiles that overlap the seams of floor panels are the most common. The carpet installer should use the minimum amount of adhesive necessary, so that the tiles can be removed easily when access to the underfloor is needed. “You also want to make sure that the carpet tiles line up with the floor panels for easy removal and replacement,” Alwine says. BD+C
UFAD Contributes to Office Building’s LEED Platinum Rating
Great River Energy’s 165,000-sf LEED Platinum headquarters in Maple Grove, Minn., is a showcase for green building systems, including underfloor air distribution. Heating and cooling are fed by a geothermal system from the waters of neighboring Arbor Lake.
“It may be the first time that geothermal has been combined with underfloor displacement ventilation in the U.S.,” says Doug Pierce, AIA, LEED AP, a senior associate with the Minneapolis office of architect Perkins+Will. Air is delivered at a constant 67?F. “During many days in spring and fall, there is very little use of compressors, saving a fair amount of energy,” he says.
UFAD with displacement ventilation helped the project earn a LEED point for indoor air quality. “To earn that point, you have to provide 30% more fresh air than the ASHRAE baseline,” Pierce says. Displacement ventilation is 20% more effective at delivering fresh air to the breathing zone than conventional mixing systems. Thus, you only need to bring in another 10% more fresh air to deliver a total 30% more fresh air to the occupant space as compared to conventional mixing ventilation systems.
Having the raised floor also made it more economical to specify 10-foot ceilings—a foot higher than usual—to enhance the daylighting in the building. “We used a post-tension slab that provided a total structural depth of only 10 inches,” Pierce says. Normally, he says, his firm would not recommend a post-tension system for institutional clients because such systems are hard to core drill for future services, and you end up with a 30-inch-deep structural system. With the raised floor, he says, “cabling and utilities could be moved around easily, so we used the post-tension slab, resulting in a high ceiling and floor-to-floor heights that were just a little less than typical.” As a result, the design gained an extra foot of interior height without increasing the exterior wall height.
Related Stories
| Aug 11, 2010
PCA partners with MIT on concrete research center
MIT today announced the creation of the Concrete Sustainability Hub, a research center established at MIT in collaboration with the Portland Cement Association (PCA) and Ready Mixed Concrete (RMC) Research & Education Foundation.
| Aug 11, 2010
Study explains the financial value of green commercial buildings
Green building may be booming, especially in the Northwest, but the claims made for high-performance buildings have been slow to gain traction in the financial community. Appraisers, lenders, investors and brokers have found it difficult to confirm the value of high-performance green features and related savings. A new study of office buildings identifies how high-performance green features and systems can increase the value of commercial buildings.
| Aug 11, 2010
Architecture Billings Index flat in May, according to AIA
After a slight decline in April, the Architecture Billings Index was up a tenth of a point to 42.9 in May. As a leading economic indicator of construction activity, the ABI reflects the approximate nine to twelve month lag time between architecture billings and construction spending. Any score above 50 indicates an increase in billings.
| Aug 11, 2010
Architecture Billings Index drops to lowest level since June
Another stall in the recovery for the construction industry as the Architecture Billings Index (ABI) dropped to its lowest level since June. The American Institute of Architects (AIA) reported the August ABI rating was 41.7, down slightly from 43.1 in July. This score indicates a decline in demand for design services (any score above 50 indicates an increase in billings).
| Aug 11, 2010
RTKL names Lance Josal president and CEO
Lance K. Josal FAIA has been named President and CEO of RTKL Associates Inc., the international planning, design and engineering firm. Josal succeeds RTKL’s current President and CEO, David C. Hudson AIA, who is retiring from the firm. The changes will take effect on 1 September 2009.
| Aug 11, 2010
Balfour Beatty agrees to acquire Parsons Brinckerhoff for $626 million
Balfour Beatty, the international engineering, construction, investment and services group, has agreed to acquire Parsons Brinckerhoff for $626 million. Balfour Beatty executives believe the merger will be a major step forward in accomplishing a number of Balfour Beatty’s objectives, including establishing a global professional services business of scale, creating a leading position in U.S. civil infrastructure, particularly in the transportation sector, and enhancing its global reach.
| Aug 11, 2010
Construction unemployment rises to 17.1% as another 64,000 construction workers are laid off in September
The national unemployment rate for the construction industry rose to 17.1 percent as another 64,000 construction workers lost their jobs in September, according to an analysis of new employment data released today. With 80 percent of layoffs occurring in nonresidential construction, Ken Simonson, chief economist for the Associated General Contractors of America, said the decline in nonresidential construction has eclipsed housing’s problems.
| Aug 11, 2010
Billings at U.S. architecture firms exceeds $40 billion annually
In the three-year period leading up to the current recession, gross billings at U.S. architecture firms increased nearly $16 billion from 2005 and totaled $44.3 billion in 2008. This equates to 54 percent growth over the three-year period with annual growth of about 16 percent. These findings are from the American Institute of Architects (AIA) Business of Architecture: AIA Survey Report on Firm Characteristics.