Engineering firms and engineering/architecture firms—those that earn more than 50% of their revenues from engineering—have their sights set on foreign shores. Many are jumping headfirst into international waters.
“Instead of overseeing projects from New York, our firm has established offices in Mumbai, Moscow, and other cities outside North America, aiming to overcome the challenge of navigating the local landscape or hiring practices, tax law, and business practices,” says Thomas Z. Scarangello, PE, CEO and Chairman of EA Giant Thornton Tomasetti.
Other firms are just dipping their toes into foreign waters, still looking for international business but choosing not to establish additional offices. Brad Harmsen, AIA, Chairman/CEO of BRPH, says that although his firm is actively working in locales across the globe, they’re partnering with domestic firms to do so, partly because of “the learning curve that comes when working with different currencies and legalities.”
SCROLL DOWN FOR GIANTS 300 ENGINEERING & ENGINEERING/ARCHITECTURE FIRM RANKINGS
Shanghai and Dubai are hot spots for E and EA Giants these days. Glumac, Magnusson Klemencic Associates, and Syska Hennessy Group have opened or expanded their offices in Shanghai. KJWW and Syska Hennessy opened new offices in Dubai. Thornton Tomasetti bucked the trend and opened offices in Beijing and Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, while Arup Americas opened new offices in São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, just in time for soccer’s World Cup in 2014.
Establishing an office abroad is one thing; getting the business is something entirely different. Referring specifically to the Middle East, Paul VanDuyne, PE, president of KJWW, says, “It takes approximately two years to develop the appropriate relationships, name recognition, and reputation to be successful in obtaining projects in this region.”
Despite the difficulties, an increasingly large share of engineering Giants’ yearly revenue is coming from international projects. Magnusson Klemencic President Ron Klemencic, PE, SE, says that 20-30% of MKA’s gross revenue comes from international business, while KJWW anticipates that 10% of its 2013 revenue will come from international projects. Syska Hennessy Group’s goal is to beef up its international activity by 25% over the next five years.
KEY ROLE OF TECHNOLOGY
Beyond establishing an international presence, technology is also a crucial differentiator for E and EA Giants firms.
Syska Hennessy Group’s new Information and Communications Technology group is offering an expanded scope of services for organizations looking to upgrade their IT platforms with the latest technologies. “Our new offerings include tools and expertise to apply virtualization of existing client environments, data center relocation management, disaster recovery and IT security services, and network and Internet/intranet design and implementation,” said Co-CEO/Co-president Cyrus J. Izzo, PE.
Thornton Tomasetti launched a new Building Sustainability practice in January and now offers LEED consulting and administration, energy and daylight modeling, and sustainable business strategies. The firm also has an advanced computational modeling team; it leverages new technologies by developing custom digital tools that utilize generative and parametric modeling, which enables its engineers to collaborate more effectively with architects in the early phases of design.
HELPING CLIENTS FIND THE MONEY FOR PROJECTS
New financing solutions are also playing a part in E/EA Giants’ business strategies. With the U.S. construction market still in recovery, alternative financing methods are being sought out to help clients put together the dollars they need to complete projects.
At Syska Hennessy Group, public-private partnerships are on the radar. “We are observing an increase in P3 projects across geographies and market sectors,” said Syska Hennessy Group’s Izzo. “The first building being delivered as a true P3 is the Long Beach courthouse in California, which will top out this summer.”
Others are bringing on experts to find the money. Graef hired an economic development specialist, Ronald Van Straten, who has more than 25 years’ experience in helping mostly municipal clients seek grants, low-cost loans, and other funding streams for their capital projects, including tax increment financing.
HEAVY CONCENTRATION AT THE TOP 10 FIRMS
As is true of most of the categories in our Giants 300 rankings, there is a great deal of concentration at the highest level in the E and EA markets. The top 10 engineering firms generated 47% of total revenue for the category, while the top 10 engineering/architecture Giants generated a hefty 85% of the dollars in their group. +
ENGINEERING FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Total Revenue ($) |
1 | Fluor Corp. | 220,674,900 |
2 | Arup | 140,324,134 |
3 | WSP USA | 98,900,000 |
4 | Syska Hennessy Group | 98,744,701 |
5 | Affiliated Engineers | 92,815,000 |
6 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | 89,000,000 |
7 | Henderson Engineers | 61,266,000 |
8 | AKF Group | 58,100,000 |
9 | TTG/TMAD Taylor & Gaines | 56,820,300 |
10 | Smith Seckman Reid | 53,497,000 |
11 | R.G. Vanderweil Engineers | 49,823,500 |
12 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | 43,784,892 |
13 | Bard, Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers | 40,100,000 |
14 | Coffman Engineers | 37,200,000 |
15 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | 36,387,033 |
16 | Degenkolb Engineers | 35,398,917 |
17 | Sebesta Blomberg | 35,120,000 |
18 | ESD/Environmental Systems Design | 34,465,000 |
19 | Rolf Jensen & Associates | 34,300,000 |
20 | Walter P Moore | 34,231,775 |
21 | RMF Engineering | 34,005,000 |
22 | Glumac | 33,010,927 |
23 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | 32,306,973 |
24 | RDK Engineers | 30,882,000 |
25 | Mazzetti Nash Lipsey Burch | 28,836,967 |
26 | Aon Fire Protection Engineering | 28,200,000 |
27 | Birdsall Services Group | 27,500,000 |
28 | Interface Engineering | 25,938,485 |
29 | M/E Engineering | 25,915,000 |
30 | ccrd partners | 24,100,000 |
31 | H.F. Lenz Co. | 22,799,000 |
32 | Heapy Engineering | 21,402,816 |
33 | Sparling | 20,589,847 |
34 | ThermalTech Engineering | 19,890,000 |
35 | KCI Technologies | 19,761,000 |
36 | Newcomb & Boyd | 18,454,021 |
37 | Henneman Engineering | 18,000,000 |
38 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Eng. | 17,650,492 |
39 | GHT Limited | 17,363,705 |
40 | Eaton Energy Solutions | 16,694,769 |
41 | Rutherford & Chekene | 16,538,000 |
42 | Dunham Associates | 15,500,000 |
43 | Joseph R. Loring & Associates | 15,000,000 |
44 | Wallace Engineering | 13,780,000 |
45 | James Posey Associates | 13,500,000 |
46 | KLH Engineers | 12,559,382 |
47 | Lilker Associates Consulting Engineers | 12,500,000 |
48 | Karpinski Engineering | 12,343,996 |
49 | P2S Engineering | 11,896,229 |
50 | RMH Group, The | 11,864,683 |
51 | Peter Basso Associates | 10,400,000 |
52 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | 10,039,000 |
53 | French & Parrello Associates | 9,782,762 |
54 | Bala Consulting Engineers | 9,360,000 |
55 | Allen & Shariff | 8,610,036 |
56 | Wick Fisher White | 7,821,928 |
57 | Brinjac Engineering | 7,342,166 |
58 | CTLGroup | 6,030,000 |
59 | O’Dea, Lynch, Abbattista Consulting Engineers | 5,900,000 |
60 | FBA Engineering | 4,000,000 |
61 | Kamm Consulting | 3,681,775 |
62 | Apogee Consulting Group | 2,485,000 |
63 | G&W Engineering | 2,058,000 |
ENGINEERING/ARCHITECTURE FIRMS
Rank | Company | 2011 Total Revenue ($) |
1 | Jacobs | 2,699,100,000 |
2 | AECOM Technology Corp. | 1,487,000,000 |
3 | M+W U.S. | 1,015,199,252 |
4 | Stantec | 463,300,000 |
5 | Parsons Brinckerhoff | 311,300,000 |
6 | URS Corp. | 294,100,000 |
7 | exp | 205,000,000 |
8 | Science Applications International Corp. | 185,390,000 |
9 | Merrick & Co. | 111,000,000 |
10 | Day & Zimmermann | 109,909,604 |
11 | SSOE Group | 107,819,740 |
12 | STV | 104,876,000 |
13 | Thornton Tomasetti | 98,017,214 |
14 | Burns & McDonnell | 94,711,826 |
15 | Dewberry | 89,282,766 |
16 | Michael Baker Jr., Inc. | 80,730,000 |
17 | Middough | 75,750,000 |
18 | Clark Nexsen | 68,424,208 |
19 | Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates | 64,080,000 |
20 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | 59,170,000 |
21 | AKF Group | 58,100,000 |
22 | H&A Architects & Engineers | 39,064,020 |
23 | Walker Parking Consultants | 34,422,898 |
24 | BRPH | 31,500,000 |
25 | Bergmann Associates | 30,700,000 |
26 | Shive-Hattery | 28,192,943 |
27 | Atkins North America | 23,620,537 |
28 | Ross & Baruzzini | 20,377,769 |
29 | Barge Waggoner Sumner & Cannon | 20,100,000 |
30 | Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor | 18,300,000 |
31 | Guernsey | 18,293,701 |
32 | L.R. Kimball | 17,759,000 |
33 | GRAEF-USA | 16,770,180 |
34 | Zak Companies | 12,335,494 |
35 | CJL Engineering | 12,228,000 |
36 | Stanley Consultants | 10,892,000 |
37 | Spectrum Engineers | 8,828,890 |
38 | GRW | 6,290,216 |
39 | Davis, Bowen & Friedel | 4,680,714 |
40 | Vintage Archonics | 1,972,220 |
Related Stories
| May 7, 2012
2012 BUILDING TEAM AWARDS: Fort Belvoir Community Hospital
A new military hospital invokes evidence-based design to create a LEED-certified facility for the nation’s soldiers and their families.
| May 7, 2012
2012 BUILDING TEAM AWARDS: Audie L. Murphy VA Hospital
How a Building Team created a high-tech rehabilitation center for wounded veterans of the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan.
| May 3, 2012
2012 BUILDING TEAM AWARDS: Rush University Medical Center
This fully integrated Building Team opted for a multi-prime contracting strategy to keep construction going on Chicago’s Rush University Medical Center, despite the economic meltdown.
| May 3, 2012
U of Michigan team looking to create highly efficient building envelope designs
The system combines the use of sensors, novel construction materials, and utility control software in an effort to create technology capable of reducing a building’s carbon footprint.
| May 3, 2012
Best commercial modular buildings and marketing programs recognized
Judges scored entries on architectural excellence, technical innovation, cost effectiveness, energy efficiency, and calendar days to complete.
| May 3, 2012
Zero Energy Research Lab opens at North Texas
The living lab—the only one of its kind in Texas—is designed to test various technologies and systems in order to achieve a net-zero consumption of energy.
| May 3, 2012
NSF publishes ANSI standard evaluating the sustainability of single ply roofing membranes
New NSF Standard provides manufacturers, specifiers and building industry with verifiable, objective criteria to identify sustainable roofing products.
| May 3, 2012
Gilbane to provide CM services for North Reading’s integrated middle/high school
The project scope includes a wastewater treatment plant, demolition of the existing high school and extensive athletic fieldwork.