flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Want to design a Guggenheim? Foundation launches open competition for proposed Helsinki museum

Want to design a Guggenheim? Foundation launches open competition for proposed Helsinki museum

This is the first time the Guggenheim Foundation has sought a design through an open competition. Anonymous submissions for stage one of the competition are due September 10, 2014.


By Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation | June 4, 2014
Waterfront view including the competition site from the Market Square, looking s
Waterfront view including the competition site from the Market Square, looking south. Photo: Tuomas Uusheimo

The Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation launched an open, international competition for the design of a proposed Guggenheim museum in Helsinki. This is the first time that the Guggenheim Foundation has sought a design through an open competition. The keenly anticipated two-stage competition is expected to draw submissions from a wide range of firms and individuals—emerging and internationally famous—from around the world.

“It is essential to the Guggenheim’s mission to engage directly with people throughout the world, to affirm the transformative potential of art, and to fuse the experience of contemporary art with great architecture,” stated Richard Armstrong, Director of the Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum and Foundation, at the formal competition launch event in Helsinki on June 4. “This competition advances all of those goals, with the aim of inspiring an exemplary museum of the 21st century that is also a meaningful addition to the landscape of Helsinki.”

The Guggenheim is organizing the architectural competition in consultation with the City of Helsinki, the State of Finland, and the Finnish Association of Architects (SAFA). The competition is managed by the London-based firm Malcolm Reading Consultants, a specialist in architectural competitions for arts, heritage, and nonprofit organizations.

An eleven-member jury selected by the Guggenheim, the State of Finland, the City of Helsinki, and SAFA will review the submissions. The jury is chaired by Mark Wigley, professor and Dean of the Graduate School of Architecture, Planning and Preservation of Columbia University, and includes:

  • Mikko Aho, Director of City Planning and architect, City of Helsinki
  • Jeanne Gang, Founder and Principal, Studio Gang Architects
  • Juan Herreros, Professor and Founder, Estudio Herreros
  • Anssi Lassila, Architect, Founder, OOPEAA Office for Peripheral Architecture
  • Erkki Leppävuori, President and CEO, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
  • Rainer Mahlamäki, Professor and Founder, Lahdelma & Mahlamäki Architects
  • Helena Säteri, Director General, Ministry of the Environment, Finland
  • Nancy Spector, Deputy Director and Jennifer and David Stockman Chief Curator, Solomon R. Guggenheim Foundation
  • Yoshiharu Tsukamoto, Founder, Atelier Bow-Wow
  • Ritva Viljanen, Deputy Mayor, City of Helsinki

Note: Guggenheim Director Richard Armstrong will attend the jury’s deliberations in an honorary, non-voting capacity.

Anonymous submissions for Stage One of the competition are due September 10, 2014. The jury will meet in Helsinki and select six finalists from the submissions made during Stage One. Submissions will be judged on the basis of their architectural design, relationship to the site and the cityscape, practicality for users, sustainability (including criteria for the use of materials), and feasibility. An online exhibition will enable the public to view all entries in the first stage, with special prominence given to the 30 highest-rated submissions.

In November 2014, the Guggenheim will announce the finalists and Stage Two of the competition will begin. Shortlisted firms or individuals will have until March 2015 to make final submissions, and the winner will be announced in June 2015. The City of Helsinki and the State of Finland are expected to deliberate on whether to proceed with the construction and development of the museum after the competition concludes.

For further information, the public and interested architects are invited to visit the competition website.

Related Stories

Healthcare Facilities | Nov 6, 2017

Design isn’t enough to foster collaboration in healthcare and research spaces

A new Perkins Eastman white paper finds limited employee interaction at NYU Winthrop Hospital, a year after it opened. 

Architects | Nov 6, 2017

How to start a negotiation: Begin as you mean to continue

How you start a negotiation often will determine where you end up, writes negotiation and mediation expert Brenda Radmacher. 

Giants 400 | Nov 3, 2017

Top 25 military architecture firms

Jacobs, Michael Baker Intl., and HDR top BD+C’s ranking of the nation’s largest military sector architecture and AE firms, as reported in the 2017 Giants 300 Report.

Engineers | Nov 2, 2017

CannonDesign expands its presence in Colorado with BWG acquisition

Future mergers could be in the offing.

Giants 400 | Nov 1, 2017

Top 35 industrial architecture firms

Jacobs, Stantec, and BRPH top BD+C’s ranking of the nation’s largest industrial sector architecture and AE firms, as reported in the 2017 Giants 300 Report.

K-12 Schools | Oct 31, 2017

Exploring empathy in architecture: Put yourself in your student’s shoes

People are enigmatic and inherently complex, which can make it difficult to design for a larger population.

Architects | Oct 31, 2017

AIA selects recipients for the 2017 Innovation Awards

The program honors projects that highlight collaboration between design and construction teams to create better process efficiencies and overall costs savings.

Giants 400 | Oct 30, 2017

Top 130 green architecture firms

Gensler, Stantec, and HOK top BD+C’s ranking of the nation’s largest green sector architecture and AE firms, as reported in the 2017 Giants 300 Report.

Architects | Oct 30, 2017

City 2050: What will your city look like in 2050?

What do we think the future will look like 30 years or so from now? And what will City: 2050 be like?

Architects | Oct 25, 2017

Mason & Hanger appoints Ben Lilly as its new president

The firm expects to continue mining growth opportunities with its federal agency clients.  

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Urban Planning

Bridging the gap: How early architect involvement can revolutionize a city’s capital improvement plans

Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) typically span three to five years and outline future city projects and their costs. While they set the stage, the design and construction of these projects often extend beyond the CIP window, leading to a disconnect between the initial budget and evolving project scope. This can result in financial shortfalls, forcing cities to cut back on critical project features.



Libraries

Reasons to reinvent the Midcentury academic library

DLR Group's Interior Design Leader Gretchen Holy, Assoc. IIDA, shares the idea that a designer's responsibility to embrace a library’s history, respect its past, and create an environment that will serve student populations for the next 100 years.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021