flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

What I wish I had learned in architecture school

Architects

What I wish I had learned in architecture school

A three-point plan for making architecture education more relevant to the long-term career requirements of today's architecture students.


By BRADFORD PERKINS, FAIA | December 17, 2021
Architecture students need broader training than what the architecture schools are providing, says Brad Perkins, FAIA. PHOTO:JURIPOZZI/STOCK.ADOBE.COM
Architecture students need broader training than what the architecture schools are providing, says Brad Perkins, FAIA. PHOTO:JURIPOZZI/STOCK.ADOBE.COM

For the last 10 years I have been teaching the Professional Practice class in Cornell’s College of Architecture, Art and Planning program in New York City. Over my long career I have also lectured or taught at over 20 other schools. I was also the editor of the current edition of the AIA’s Architecture Student's Handbook of Professional Practice, which is the companion textbook for the course at many schools.

In this one-semester course, I, along with one of my colleagues and guest lecturers from a host of leading firms, do our best to introduce 19 subjects in 13-15 two-hour classes. These are the subject areas that will probably take up the majority of their time should they become senior principals in a successful architectural practice.

1-2 HOURS IS NOT ENOUGH TIME FOR THESE IMPORTANT TOPICS

That means we have only one or two hours to introduce such key subjects as marketing and business development, contracts and other legal issues, organizing and managing design teams to carry out complex projects, land-use regulation and the public approval process, building codes, estimating and scheduling, working internationally, and developing a business plan for a new company or service.

This is not enough time to devote to these crucially important topics. All of the design professions are becoming increasingly complex, yet most architectural schools are not preparing their students to address these changes and their complexity.

Design is, of course, the core of architectural education but even here many programs are not exposing their students to some of the most critical trends they will face when they embark on their careers. As leading companies in many fields have shown, design thinking is important in many more businesses than just the design of buildings. Firms such as Apple, Nike, and GE Medical Systems, as well as the Hasso Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford (commonly known as the d.School) and IDEO, show that design thinking and training are important in many other major sectors of the economy. But so are the complementary skill sets that allow design professionals to be effective and successful.

THE CHANGING NATURE OF TODAY’S ARCHITECTURE STUDENTS

One of the most obvious changes in architectural education in the last 10-15 years is immediately apparent on the first day of class each semester. I usually teach undergraduate BArch students in the fall and graduate MArch students in the spring. Unlike in my time at Cornell, the majority of the students are now women, and often more than half the students, men and women, are foreign-born. Based on the student evaluations we receive, most say they find the class eye opening, interesting, and relevant. They are typically very bright, highly motivated, and fun to teach. I usually hire several each year and stay in touch with many others after graduation. Yet as I follow their careers, it reinforces my belief that we should have done more to prepare them for the unknowns of today’s profession.

Unlike most of my students, I was very lucky in one respect. I had a grandfather (Dwight Perkins, FAIA) and a father (Lawrence Perkins, FAIA) who built large, successful architectural practices. This meant that I was exposed to the realities of my chosen profession even before I attended college. My parents also supported me through a liberal arts degree from Cornell and an MBA from Stanford, in addition to my architectural degree. As a result I started my five-decade career with more of head start than most of my peers. This head start also made me better prepared to deal with the accelerating changes that I found when I entered the profession and prepared me to found and now chair an 1,100-person firm with 22 offices around the world.

When I first became a senior principal in an architectural practice, 10 years before Mary-Jean Eastman and I started Perkins Eastman,  the practice of architecture was vastly different from what it is today. The widespread use of computers was more than a decade in the future. Few firms practiced nationally; still fewer practiced internationally. The profession was competitive, but the competition was limited in number, not particularly specialized, and relatively unsophisticated. Few firms had or thought they needed sophisticated accounting, HR, marketing, communications, or technology support personnel. The typical design assignment was much simpler, so architects focused primarily on what the standard AIA contracts refer to as “Basic Services.”

GROWING DEPENDENCE ON TECHNOLOGY AND SPECIALIZATION

Today we are highly dependent on sophisticated technology platforms. More and more firms are competing beyond their local markets; many are working nationally and internationally. There is more competition, and it is far more sophisticated. The size and sophistication of the administrative and technology support personnel at most mid-size to large firms has grown to respond to an increasingly challenging business and technical environment. And the design assignments, project team structures, project delivery methods, and client expectations have become increasingly demanding and complex, requiring much more specialization, larger teams, and a vastly broader array of services.

Architecture and its sibling design professions are, of necessity, having to become much more sophisticated in how they provide design services, while simultaneously becoming much more sophisticated as businesses. When I was in architectural school, Design Studio was the only course that really mattered. Other courses were required for accreditation, of course, but the Professional Practice class, for example, was viewed as so irrelevant that it was assigned to a faculty member that no one wanted teaching an “important” subject.

While most of the non-design courses have grown in importance and relevance, but in most schools Professional Practice and courses in many of the other emerging critical skill sets have not. The curricula in many schools looks too much like the program I attended over 50 years ago except, of course, for the sophisticated digital technology required to practice architecture today.

A MODEST PROPOSAL TO THE ARCHITECTURE SCHOOLS

For all these reasons, I feel it’s time for all architecture schools to recognize the dramatic shifts occurring in practice and change their curricula to better prepare their students for the future. At very least architectural schools should:

– Make it possible for students who want more than an introduction to the many essential subjects that most schools limit to one semester, either by offering the option to take more advanced classes in these subjects or by making courses in the university’s business, law, and other professional schools available as electives.

– Provide more extensive training in the skill sets that are essential in almost every senior AEC position: basic leadership skills, effective presentation skills (oral, written, and visual), how to analyze a basic business problem and develop a plan of action, and how to build, organize, and manage a team of professionals to carry out complex design and construction assignments.

– Introduce what it takes to be successful in the AEC field and career planning early in curricula, so that students have a framework for understanding what they need to learn and what skill sets they need to build a successful career.

Overall there must be more emphasis in architectural curricula on the skill sets that go beyond the core design courses that are (and always will be) central to design education. Today’s architecture students also need training and education to develop other skill sets that will enable them to organize and manage the increasingly complex teams and support structures that it takes to compete for and carry out the ever more challenging assignments our clients are asking us to execute.

ABOUT THE AUTHOR

Bradford Perkins, FAIA, is the Founder and Chairman of Perkins Eastman Architects.

 

Related Stories

Adaptive Reuse | Sep 12, 2024

White paper on office-to-residential conversions released by IAPMO

IAPMO has published a new white paper titled “Adaptive Reuse: Converting Offices to Multi-Residential Family,” a comprehensive analysis of addressing housing shortages through the conversion of office spaces into residential units.

Mixed-Use | Sep 10, 2024

Centennial Yards, a $5 billion mixed-use development in downtown Atlanta, tops out its first residential tower

Centennial Yards Company has topped out The Mitchell, the first residential tower of Centennial Yards, a $5 billion mixed-use development in downtown Atlanta. Construction of the apartment building is expected to be complete by the middle of next year, with first move-ins slated for summer 2025.

Healthcare Facilities | Sep 9, 2024

Exploring the cutting edge of neuroscience facility design

BWBR Communications Specialist Amanda Fisher shares the unique considerations and challenges of designing neuroscience facilities.

Office Buildings | Sep 6, 2024

Fact sheet outlines benefits, challenges of thermal energy storage for commercial buildings

A U.S. Dept. of Energy document discusses the benefits and challenges of thermal energy storage for commercial buildings. The document explains how the various types of thermal energy storage technologies work, where their installation is most beneficial, and some practical considerations around installations.

Office Buildings | Sep 5, 2024

Office space downsizing trend appears to be past peak

The office downsizing trend may be past its peak, according to a CBRE survey of 225 companies with offices in the U.S., Canada, and Latin America. Just 37% of companies plan to shrink their office space this year compared to 57% last year, the survey found.

University Buildings | Sep 4, 2024

UC San Diego’s new Multidisciplinary Life Sciences Building will support research and teaching in both health and biological sciences

The University of California San Diego has approved plans for a new Multidisciplinary Life Sciences Building, with construction starting this fall. The 200,000-sf, six-level facility will be the first building on the UC San Diego campus to bridge health science research with biological science research and teaching. 

Codes and Standards | Sep 3, 2024

Atlanta aims to crack down on blighted properties with new tax

A new Atlanta law is intended to crack down on absentee landlords including commercial property owners and clean up neglected properties. The “Blight Tax” allows city officials to put levies on blighted property owners up to 25 times higher than current millage rates.

Resiliency | Sep 3, 2024

Phius introduces retrofit standard for more resilient buildings

Phius recently released, REVIVE 2024, a retrofit standard for more resilient buildings. The standard focuses on resilience against grid outages by ensuring structures remain habitable for at least a week during extreme weather events.

Construction Costs | Sep 2, 2024

Construction material decreases level out, but some increases are expected to continue for the balance Q3 2024

The Q3 2024 Quarterly Construction Insights Report from Gordian examines the numerous variables that influence material pricing, including geography, global events and commodity volatility. Gordian and subject matter experts examine fluctuations in costs, their likely causes, and offer predictions about where pricing is likely to go from here. Here is a sampling of the report’s contents.

Adaptive Reuse | Aug 29, 2024

More than 1.2 billion sf of office space have strong potential for residential conversion

More than 1.2 billion sf of U.S. office space—14.8% of the nation’s total—have strong potential for conversion to residential use, according to real estate software and services firm Yardi. Yardi’s new Conversion Feasibility Index scores office buildings on their suitability for multifamily conversion.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Urban Planning

Bridging the gap: How early architect involvement can revolutionize a city’s capital improvement plans

Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) typically span three to five years and outline future city projects and their costs. While they set the stage, the design and construction of these projects often extend beyond the CIP window, leading to a disconnect between the initial budget and evolving project scope. This can result in financial shortfalls, forcing cities to cut back on critical project features.



Libraries

Reasons to reinvent the Midcentury academic library

DLR Group's Interior Design Leader Gretchen Holy, Assoc. IIDA, shares the idea that a designer's responsibility to embrace a library’s history, respect its past, and create an environment that will serve student populations for the next 100 years.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021