Cities and airport operators are using innovative schemes to finance ambitious terminal projects at U.S. airports. The ultimate goal: improved passenger satisfaction.
The $4 billion renovation of New York City’s LaGuardia Airport is the first major U.S. aviation project delivered using a public-private partnership (P3) model. The airport’s new 1.3 million-sf Central Terminal B, which will replace the existing 1964 terminal building, is being led by a design-build joint venture of Skanska and Walsh Construction. WSP USA and HOK are the design partners.
“Given the extremely tight site and aggressive schedule, it would be extremely challenging to deliver this project through a traditional approach,” says Dwight Pullen, Director of Skanska’s Aviation Center of Excellence. “Our design and phasing solution worked a lot more seamlessly under a P3 arrangement.”
At Los Angeles International Airport, the new $1.6 billion Midfield Satellite Concourse, which is part of a wider $14 billion overhaul at LAX, is also being delivered using a P3 approach. Corgan and Gensler are collaborating on the design. A Turner-PCL joint venture is building the 12-gate concourse, which is scheduled to open in 2019.
“P3 is increasingly attractive to municipalities and airport operators, and I foresee a number of airports seizing the P3 opportunity in the next several years,” says Robert Chicas, AIA, LEED AP, Director of Aviation + Transportation in HOK’s New York shop.
They may not have a choice. According to Airports Council International–North America, airports will generate only about half the financing they’ll need to meet the estimated $100 billion infrastructure investment required through 2021. Combine the shortage of funds for capital infrastructure needs with uncertainty about whether the federal government will increase the passenger facilities charge, which is used for facility improvements, and “it’s a market ripe for new solutions,” says Pullen.
MAKING TERMINALS CUSTOMER-CENTRIC
Airports are creating hospitality-rich environments for passengers and visitors. “Customer satisfaction has bubbled to the top as one of the highest priorities at every airport in the country,” says Chicas. “All airlines see the terminals they operate in as an extension of their brand. They know the strength and perception of that brand is key to their commercial success.”
To adapt to changes in regulations and requirements, terminals are being designed as flexible environments with few columns, broad floor plates, clear lines of circulation, and lots of natural light. Air travelers are also demanding state-of-the-art technology and abundant amenities to enhance travel experience—or at least reduce some of the anxiety.
“Airlines and airports are working to put more control into passenger hands to streamline the process for experienced travelers,” says Wilson Rayfield, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP, Executive Vice President of Aviation with Gresham, Smith and Partners. His firm is helping Southwest Airlines integrate self-tagging kiosks in multiple locations across the SWA network.
Stuart Garrett, Project Manager in the Aviation and Federal Group at Burns & McDonnell, agrees. “People want to feel like they’re more in control of their journey. It makes them more comfortable. And less-stressed people spend more money,” he says.
ALSO SEE: BD+C Giants 300 airport rankings
Top 30 airport architecture firms
Top 30 airport engineering firms
Top 40 airport construction firms
FOCUS ON REVENUE-GENERATING ACTIVITIES
Terminal designers are creating intuitive layouts and passenger flow that increase touch points around concession and retail offerings.
“With the tightening of connection times for domestic travel in the U.S., there has been an increased focus on grab-and-go concession opportunities and interactive spaces where passengers can plug in, recharge, and order food while still maintaining close proximity to their boarding gates,” says Thomas Haag, PE, National Director of Aviation with Walsh Group.
At the same time, airport operators recognize the need to accommodate a growing population of older flyers who need more time and assistance to pass through security and board their flights. “If it takes 15 more minutes for a person to board a flight, over the course of a day, that’s a huge impact on gate and aircraft utilization, which impacts airports and airlines,” says GS&P’s Rayfield. His team is working with the Airport Cooperative Research Program to develop a wayfinding guidebook for airport operators and planners to assist elderly and disabled air travelers.
Most AEC firms that specialize in terminal work see nothing but blue skies for the foreseeable future. “It’s obviously a great market for those of us who design and build airport projects, but it’s going to be a challenge to keep up with it all,” says Jay Fraser, VP and General Manager of Turner Construction Company’s Aviation Group.
SEE ALL 2017 GIANTS 300 RANKINGS
Related Stories
Giants 400 | Aug 11, 2021
BD+C Awards Programs
Entry information and past winners for Building Design+Construction's two major awards programs: 40 Under 40 and Giants 400
University Buildings | Aug 6, 2021
Is air quality the next hot campus amenity?
New research shows that students want to be back on campus, but they—and their parents—are asking more of higher ed institutions.
Giants 400 | Dec 16, 2020
Download a PDF of all 2020 Giants 400 Rankings
This 70-page PDF features AEC firm rankings across 51 building sectors, disciplines, and specialty services.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Science & Technology Facilities Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the S+T sector
HDR, Jacobs, and Turner head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Laboratory Facilities Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. laboratory facilities sector
Affiliated Engineers, HDR, and Skanska top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest laboratory facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Industrial Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. industrial buildings sector
Clayco, Jacobs, and Ware Malcomb top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest industrial buildings sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Convention Center Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. convention center sector
AECOM, Gensler, and Jacobs head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest convention center sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Reconstruction Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. building reconstruction and renovation sector
Gensler, Jacobs, and STO Building Group head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest reconstruction sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 K-12 School Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. K-12 school facilities sector
AECOM, Gilbane, and PBK head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest K-12 school facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Dec 3, 2020
2020 Sports Facilities Sector Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the U.S. sports facilities sector
Kimley-Horn, Mortenson, and Populous top BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest sports facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
