Cities and airport operators are using innovative schemes to finance ambitious terminal projects at U.S. airports. The ultimate goal: improved passenger satisfaction.
The $4 billion renovation of New York City’s LaGuardia Airport is the first major U.S. aviation project delivered using a public-private partnership (P3) model. The airport’s new 1.3 million-sf Central Terminal B, which will replace the existing 1964 terminal building, is being led by a design-build joint venture of Skanska and Walsh Construction. WSP USA and HOK are the design partners.
“Given the extremely tight site and aggressive schedule, it would be extremely challenging to deliver this project through a traditional approach,” says Dwight Pullen, Director of Skanska’s Aviation Center of Excellence. “Our design and phasing solution worked a lot more seamlessly under a P3 arrangement.”
At Los Angeles International Airport, the new $1.6 billion Midfield Satellite Concourse, which is part of a wider $14 billion overhaul at LAX, is also being delivered using a P3 approach. Corgan and Gensler are collaborating on the design. A Turner-PCL joint venture is building the 12-gate concourse, which is scheduled to open in 2019.
“P3 is increasingly attractive to municipalities and airport operators, and I foresee a number of airports seizing the P3 opportunity in the next several years,” says Robert Chicas, AIA, LEED AP, Director of Aviation + Transportation in HOK’s New York shop.
They may not have a choice. According to Airports Council International–North America, airports will generate only about half the financing they’ll need to meet the estimated $100 billion infrastructure investment required through 2021. Combine the shortage of funds for capital infrastructure needs with uncertainty about whether the federal government will increase the passenger facilities charge, which is used for facility improvements, and “it’s a market ripe for new solutions,” says Pullen.
MAKING TERMINALS CUSTOMER-CENTRIC
Airports are creating hospitality-rich environments for passengers and visitors. “Customer satisfaction has bubbled to the top as one of the highest priorities at every airport in the country,” says Chicas. “All airlines see the terminals they operate in as an extension of their brand. They know the strength and perception of that brand is key to their commercial success.”
To adapt to changes in regulations and requirements, terminals are being designed as flexible environments with few columns, broad floor plates, clear lines of circulation, and lots of natural light. Air travelers are also demanding state-of-the-art technology and abundant amenities to enhance travel experience—or at least reduce some of the anxiety.
“Airlines and airports are working to put more control into passenger hands to streamline the process for experienced travelers,” says Wilson Rayfield, AIA, NCARB, LEED AP, Executive Vice President of Aviation with Gresham, Smith and Partners. His firm is helping Southwest Airlines integrate self-tagging kiosks in multiple locations across the SWA network.
Stuart Garrett, Project Manager in the Aviation and Federal Group at Burns & McDonnell, agrees. “People want to feel like they’re more in control of their journey. It makes them more comfortable. And less-stressed people spend more money,” he says.
ALSO SEE: BD+C Giants 300 airport rankings
Top 30 airport architecture firms
Top 30 airport engineering firms
Top 40 airport construction firms
FOCUS ON REVENUE-GENERATING ACTIVITIES
Terminal designers are creating intuitive layouts and passenger flow that increase touch points around concession and retail offerings.
“With the tightening of connection times for domestic travel in the U.S., there has been an increased focus on grab-and-go concession opportunities and interactive spaces where passengers can plug in, recharge, and order food while still maintaining close proximity to their boarding gates,” says Thomas Haag, PE, National Director of Aviation with Walsh Group.
At the same time, airport operators recognize the need to accommodate a growing population of older flyers who need more time and assistance to pass through security and board their flights. “If it takes 15 more minutes for a person to board a flight, over the course of a day, that’s a huge impact on gate and aircraft utilization, which impacts airports and airlines,” says GS&P’s Rayfield. His team is working with the Airport Cooperative Research Program to develop a wayfinding guidebook for airport operators and planners to assist elderly and disabled air travelers.
Most AEC firms that specialize in terminal work see nothing but blue skies for the foreseeable future. “It’s obviously a great market for those of us who design and build airport projects, but it’s going to be a challenge to keep up with it all,” says Jay Fraser, VP and General Manager of Turner Construction Company’s Aviation Group.
SEE ALL 2017 GIANTS 300 RANKINGS
Related Stories
| Sep 1, 2016
COURTHOUSE GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top courthouse design and construction firms
DLR Group, NBBJ, Hensel Phelps, Sundt Construction, AECOM, and Dewberry top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest courthouse sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 30, 2016
CONVENTION CENTER GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top convention center sector design and construction firms
Gensler, LMN Architects, AECOM, Turner Construction Co., and WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest convention center sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
BIM and Information Technology | Aug 30, 2016
BIM GIANTS: A ranking of the nation's top BIM design and construction firms
HOK, Perkins+Will, Turner Construction Co., The Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., Jacobs, and Thornton Tomasetti top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest BIM AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 19, 2016
RECONSTRUCTION GIANTS: Facelifts give buildings new identities, even as they keep a few wrinkles
Reconstruction is always a balancing act between the client’s pro forma and what the building needs to be vibrant again.
| Aug 19, 2016
Top 70 Reconstruction Engineering Firms
Jacobs, Robins & Morton, and The Boldt Company top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest reconstruction sector engineering and E/A firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 19, 2016
Top 110 Reconstruction Construction Firms
Gilbane Building Co., Turner Construction Co., and The Whiting-Turner Contracting Co. top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest reconstruction sector construction and construction management firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 19, 2016
Top 130 Reconstruction Architecture Firms
The Beck Group, Stantec, and IMC Consruction top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest reconstruction sector architecture and A/E firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 18, 2016
LOCAL GOVERNMENT GIANTS: A ranking of the nation’s top design and construction firms in local sector work
HOK, Stantec, Turner Construction Co.,Clark Group, AECOM and STV top Building Design+Construction’s annual rankings of the nation’s largest local government sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 18, 2016
STATE GOVERNMENT GIANTS: A ranking of the nation’s top design and construction firms in state sector work
CannonDesign, Stantec, Turner Construction Co.,Mortensen Construction, WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff and AECOM top Building Design+Construction’s annual rankings of the nation’s largest state government sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 18, 2016
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT GIANTS: A ranking of the nation’s top design and construction firms in federal sector work
Page, EYP, Fluor Corp.,BL Harbert International, and AECOM top Building Design+Construction’s annual rankings of the nation’s largest federal government sector AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
