Two months ago, the foundation was poured for CUBE, a 2,200-sf, two-story building on the premises of Technical University Dresden in Germany, that claims to be the world’s first building made entirely of carbon-fiber reinforced concrete.
This 5 million Euro (US$5.63 million) project, which was delayed because of the coronavirus outbreak, is now scheduled for completion next spring. It consists of two parts: a precast “box”; and the “twist,” a double-curved roof that the lighter-weight and bendable composite facilitates. This university building—with classroom, lab, and presentation spaces, and a small kitchen—will be distinguished by its 24-meter length of seamless concrete.
The German Federal Ministry of Education and Research provided the financing for this demonstration project, which is also known locally as Carbonhaus. (CUBE is shorthand for C3—Carbon Concrete Composite.) The design architect is Gunter Henn, chairman of Munich-based architecture firm HENN. Architeckten Ingenieure Batzen (AIB) is the engineer, Assmann Advice + Plan is providing structural planning services, Bendl HTS is the CE, and Betonwerk Oschatz is building the Box. The Institute of Concrete Construction at the University of Applied Sciences, Economics, and Culture in Leipzig; and the Institute of Concrete Structures at Technical University Dresden are also involved in this project, the latter on the procurement side.
Carbonhaus will include spaces for classrooms, events, and labs.
WHAT IS CARBON-FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE?
Carbon-fiber reinforced concrete is a composite product that consists of carbon fiber—which provides strength and stiffness—and polymers—which hold the fibers together in a kind of matrix. The micro- or macrofibers can be either synthetic or natural. The consensus within the industry is that this kind of reinforcement can significantly increase the life of the structure in which the composite is used.
The carbon fiber being deployed for CUBE is produced from petroleum-based polyacrylonitrile, or PAN. It can also be made from lignin, an organic polymer derived from waste material in paper production. TU Munich has been exploring the production of carbon fiber from algae oil.
Manfred Curbach, director of the Institute of Concrete Construction at TU Dresden, where he is a professor, has been advocating for the greater use of lighter-weight and thinner reinforcement materials for more than two decades, starting with textiles and glass, and—since 2003—carbon-fiber. So far, however, the construction industry has been slow to embrace these materials for concrete components, especially in new construction of infrastructure and buildings. Curbach blames regulations that make the introduction of these materials more difficult to achieve.
And then there’s industry inertia. “The industry has been using the same reinforcement methods for the last 40 years,” says Barzin Mobasher, a professor at the School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment at Arizona State University, who has been researching and working with different structural reinforcement alternatives since 1991.
SEE ALSO: Lessons From a Builder's Offsite Construction Journey, featured on BD+C's new Accelerate AEC innovations site (short registration required).
So, for example, at least half of the concrete in a typical building component is used to protect the steel reinforcement from corrosion. Mobasher adds that as much as 60% of a concrete structure is dead weight that isn’t factored into the design.
Mobasher elaborates that because steel and concrete “work in tandem, but not together,” the resulting component continues to be prone to cracking and erosion, to the point where buildings and infrastructure don’t last anywhere near as long as they should. “They are designed for strength, but not durability, and no one is accountable after 10 years of service.”
On the other hand, the weight of carbon reinforcement materials is about one-quarter that of steel, with the same tensile strength. The composite component is more durable and, Curbach explains, saves up to 70% in greenhouse gas emissions. And cost isn’t an obstacle when one factors in labor, equipment, manufacturing, and transportation. (Carbon reinforced concrete costs $13-15 per kilogram to produce, about the same as steel.)
Curbach points to Carbonhaus’ twisted roof as evidence of how the material can be bended and molded into all kinds of shapes, giving designers and engineers greater flexibility.
INFRASTRUCTURE REPAIR HOLDS OUT SOME PROMISE FOR CARBON-FIBER REINFORCED CONCRETE
To advance the use of carbon-fiber reinforced concrete, Curbach launched Curbach Bösche Ingenieurpartner Dresden, a consulting firm, in 2005. Nine years later, he started CarbonCon, an entity that disseminates information about the materials.
While he hasn’t had direct contacts with AEC firms in North America yet, Curbach says companies in China and Israel have shown some interest. Curbach remains convinced that carbon reinforced concrete is going to be more widely used, but it could take 20 years, and would require regulations “that would help accelerate the decline of CO2.”
A curved roof and one wall that is 24 meters of seamless concrete are two characteristics of Carbonhaus.
Mobasher notes that light-gauge steel, which wasn’t used that much for construction 25 years ago, is now ubiquitous for commercial framing. He sees no reason why carbon reinforcing materials couldn’t have the same trajectory, although he acknowledges that using these materials for transportation infrastructure in the U.S. is still cost prohibitive.
He has seen some domestic interest in using carbon-fiber reinforcing materials for quicker repair work, where a layer of the composite would be integrated into the damaged infrastructure.
Indeed, Augsburg University in Germany has developed reinforcement materials with short carbon fibers that have proven effective for mitigating stress fractures and cracks in concrete. However, a complete replacement of reinforcing steel in structural elements requires relatively large reinforcement cross-sections of continuous carbon fibers oriented in the direction of the stress. This can’t be accomplished with short fibers that are finely distributed.
Related Stories
AEC Innovators | Mar 3, 2023
Meet BD+C's 2023 AEC Innovators
More than ever, AEC firms and their suppliers are wedding innovation with corporate responsibility. How they are addressing climate change usually gets the headlines. But as the following articles in our AEC Innovators package chronicle, companies are attempting to make an impact as well on the integrity of their supply chains, the reduction of construction waste, and answering calls for more affordable housing and homeless shelters. As often as not, these companies are partnering with municipalities and nonprofit interest groups to help guide their production.
Codes | Mar 2, 2023
Biden Administration’s proposed building materials rules increase domestic requirements
The Biden Administration’s proposal on building materials rules used on federal construction and federally funded state and local buildings would significantly boost the made-in-America mandate. In the past, products could qualify as domestically made if at least 55% of the value of their components were from the U.S.
AEC Innovators | Mar 2, 2023
Turner Construction extends its ESG commitment to thwarting forced labor in its supply chain
Turner Construction joins a growing AEC industry movement, inspired by the Design for Freedom initiative, to eliminate forced labor and child labor from the production and distribution of building products.
AEC Innovators | Feb 28, 2023
Meet the 'urban miner' who is rethinking how we deconstruct and reuse buildings
New Horizon Urban Mining, a demolition firm in the Netherlands, has hitched its business model to construction materials recycling. It's plan: deconstruct buildings and infrastructure and sell the building products for reuse in new construction. New Horizon and its Founder Michel Baars have been named 2023 AEC Innovators by Building Design+Construction editors.
Codes and Standards | Feb 8, 2023
GSA releases draft of federal low embodied carbon material standards
The General Services Administration recently released a document that outlines standards for low embodied carbon materials and products to be used on federal construction projects.
Concrete | Jan 24, 2023
Researchers investigate ancient Roman concrete to make durable, lower carbon mortar
Researchers have turned to an ancient Roman concrete recipe to develop more durable concrete that lasts for centuries and can potentially reduce the carbon impact of the built environment.
Standards | Jan 19, 2023
Fenestration Alliance updates liquid applied flashing standard
The Fenestration and Glazing Industry Alliance (FGIA) published an update to its Liquid Applied Flashing Standard. The document contains minimum performance requirements for liquid applied flashing used to provide water-resistive seals around exterior wall openings in buildings.
Sponsored | Resiliency | Dec 14, 2022
Flood protection: What building owners need to know to protect their properties
This course from Walter P Moore examines numerous flood protection approaches and building owner needs before delving into the flood protection process. Determining the flood resilience of a property can provide a good understanding of risk associated costs.
K-12 Schools | Nov 30, 2022
School districts are prioritizing federal funds for air filtration, HVAC upgrades
U.S. school districts are widely planning to use funds from last year’s American Rescue Plan (ARP) to upgrade or improve air filtration and heating/cooling systems, according to a report from the Center for Green Schools at the U.S. Green Building Council. The report, “School Facilities Funding in the Pandemic,” says air filtration and HVAC upgrades are the top facility improvement choice for the 5,004 school districts included in the analysis.
University Buildings | Nov 13, 2022
University of Washington opens mass timber business school building
Founders Hall at the University of Washington Foster School of Business, the first mass timber building at Seattle campus of Univ. of Washington, was recently completed. The 84,800-sf building creates a new hub for community, entrepreneurship, and innovation, according the project’s design architect LMN Architects.