HDR, Jacobs, and Turner head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.
| Top 45 Science & Technology Facilities Sector Architecture and AE Firms for 2020 | ||
| FIRM | 2019 REVENUE | |
| 1 | HDR | $49,784,918 |
| 2 | SmithGroup | $42,644,554 |
| 3 | Perkins and Will | $31,508,770 |
| 4 | HOK | $29,259,000 |
| 5 | Page | $22,500,000 |
| 6 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill | $17,597,921 |
| 7 | SGA | $16,514,202 |
| 8 | TRIA | $13,327,250 |
| 9 | CannonDesign | $12,000,000 |
| 10 | EXP | $11,295,975 |
| 11 | EwingCole | $10,800,000 |
| 12 | BSA LifeStructures | $10,583,465 |
| 13 | Perkins Eastman | $10,497,913 |
| 14 | DGA | $9,140,372 |
| 15 | Clark Enersen Partners, The | $8,844,964 |
| 16 | Ayers Saint Gross | $8,732,874 |
| 17 | CO Architects | $5,625,400 |
| 18 | Flad Architects | $5,391,000 |
| 19 | HGA | $5,164,162 |
| 20 | LMN Architects | $5,000,000 |
| 21 | Huntsman Architectural Group | $4,897,443 |
| 22 | TreanorHL | $4,600,000 |
| 23 | BWBR | $4,544,000 |
| 24 | Hastings+Chivetta Architects | $3,568,754 |
| 25 | NBBJ | $3,200,000 |
| 26 | Architectural Resources Cambridge (ARC) | $2,746,567 |
| 27 | Clark Nexsen | $2,700,000 |
| 28 | MBH Architects | $2,510,000 |
| 29 | HLW | $2,500,000 |
| 30 | Gensler | $2,211,090 |
| 31 | HED | $2,000,000 |
| 32 | KGD Architecture | $1,958,583 |
| 33 | Alliiance | $1,782,508 |
| 34 | Ballinger | $1,741,967 |
| 35 | Ware Malcomb | $1,703,756 |
| 36 | Bergmann | $1,500,000 |
| 37 | RSP Architects | $893,000 |
| 38 | Margulies Perruzzi | $889,855 |
| 39 | Kirksey Architecture | $830,711 |
| 40 | Mithun | $771,275 |
| 41 | Urbahn Architects | $677,662 |
| 42 | YGH Architecture | $524,640 |
| 43 | Taylor Design | $509,000 |
| 44 | CPL | $191,190 |
| 45 | AHL | $149,813 |
| 46 | Leo A Daly | $58,491 |
| 47 | Ratio Architects | $4,359 |
| Top 30 Science & Technology Facilities Sector Engineering and EA Firms for 2020 | ||
| FIRM | 2019 REVENUE | |
| 1 | Jacobs | $155,000,000 |
| 2 | Jensen Hughes | $10,983,620 |
| 3 | BRPH Architects Engineers | $7,163,817 |
| 4 | RMF Engineering | $7,000,000 |
| 5 | Vanderweil Engineers | $6,300,800 |
| 6 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | $6,279,000 |
| 7 | STV | $3,507,364 |
| 8 | Dewberry | $3,474,828 |
| 9 | Newcomb & Boyd | $3,317,035 |
| 10 | PS&S | $3,228,000 |
| 11 | Thornton Tomasetti | $3,175,392 |
| 12 | IMEG Corp. | $2,896,698 |
| 13 | RMH Group, The | $2,170,155 |
| 14 | CDM Smith | $1,903,525 |
| 15 | Syska Hennessy Group | $1,780,453 |
| 16 | M/E Engineering | $1,436,365 |
| 17 | Jaros, Baum & Bolles | $1,398,116 |
| 18 | NV5 Global | $1,326,000 |
| 19 | Arup | $1,208,763 |
| 20 | Mazzetti | $1,102,926 |
| 21 | Paradigm Structural Engineers | $1,076,088 |
| 22 | AKF Group | $860,000 |
| 23 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | $800,282 |
| 24 | SSOE Group | $773,839 |
| 25 | Peter Basso Associates | $300,000 |
| 26 | Dunham Associates | $250,000 |
| 27 | Osborn Engineering | $225,000 |
| 28 | Arora Engineers | $208,133 |
| 29 | Highland Associates | $200,000 |
| 30 | KLH Engineers | $171,529 |
| 31 | Milhouse Engineering and Construction | $96,508 |
| 32 | Wallace Engineering | $50,000 |
| 33 | Walter P Moore | $24,597 |
| Top 25 Science & Technology Facilities Sector Contractors and CM Firms for 2020 | ||
| FIRM | 2019 REVENUE | |
| 1 | Turner Construction Company | $355,370,930 |
| 2 | DPR Construction | $328,591,000 |
| 3 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Company, The | $267,633,449 |
| 4 | Gilbane Building Company | $181,237,000 |
| 5 | Jacobs | $88,169,000 |
| 6 | McCownGordon Construction, LLC | $82,032,154 |
| 7 | Skanska USA | $60,157,913 |
| 8 | Messer Construction | $55,609,097 |
| 9 | Columbia | $54,000,000 |
| 10 | McCarthy Holdings | $52,879,764 |
| 11 | LeChase Construction Services | $51,177,952 |
| 12 | Swinerton | $40,000,000 |
| 13 | Barton Malow | $34,369,566 |
| 14 | BRPH Architects Engineers | $11,989,183 |
| 15 | Andersen Construction | $6,400,000 |
| 16 | Kraus-Anderson Construction | $6,000,000 |
| 17 | Donohoe Construction | $5,186,812 |
| 18 | Cumming | $5,015,750 |
| 19 | Hagerman Group, The | $5,000,000 |
| 20 | Russell Construction | $5,000,000 |
| 21 | STV | $4,308,536 |
| 22 | Fortis Construction | $3,886,382 |
| 23 | Robins & Morton | $2,965,922 |
| 24 | Hill International | $415,243 |
| 25 | W.E. O'Neil Construction | $234,804 |
BACK TO THE 2020 GIANTS 400 LANDING PAGE
Related Stories
MFPRO+ New Projects | Oct 30, 2024
BIG’s One High Line finally reaches completion in New York City’s West Chelsea neighborhood
One High Line, a luxury residential project spanning a full city block in New York’s West Chelsea neighborhood, reached completion this summer following years of delays related to investor lawsuits.
Urban Planning | Oct 30, 2024
Bridging the gap: How early architect involvement can revolutionize a city’s capital improvement plans
Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) typically span three to five years and outline future city projects and their costs. While they set the stage, the design and construction of these projects often extend beyond the CIP window, leading to a disconnect between the initial budget and evolving project scope. This can result in financial shortfalls, forcing cities to cut back on critical project features.
MFPRO+ New Projects | Oct 30, 2024
Luxury waterfront tower in Brooklyn features East River and Manhattan skyline views
Leasing recently began for The Dupont, a 41-story luxury rental property along the Brooklyn, N.Y., waterfront. Located within the 22-acre Greenpoint Landing, where it overlooks the newly constructed Newtown Barge Park, the high-rise features East River and Manhattan skyline views along with 20,000 sf of indoor and outdoor communal space.
Libraries | Oct 30, 2024
Reasons to reinvent the Midcentury academic library
DLR Group's Interior Design Leader Gretchen Holy, Assoc. IIDA, shares the idea that a designer's responsibility to embrace a library’s history, respect its past, and create an environment that will serve student populations for the next 100 years.
Resiliency | Oct 29, 2024
Climate change degrades buildings slowly but steadily
While natural disasters such as hurricanes and wildfires can destroy buildings in minutes, other factors exacerbated by climate change degrade buildings more slowly but still cause costly damage.
Office Buildings | Oct 29, 2024
Editorial call for Office Building project case studies
BD+C editors are looking to feature a roundup of office building projects for 2024, including office-to-residential conversions. Deadline for submission: December 6, 2024.
Healthcare Facilities | Oct 28, 2024
New surgical tower is largest addition to UNC Health campus in Chapel Hill
Construction on UNC Health’s North Carolina Surgical Hospital, the largest addition to the Chapel Hill campus since it was built in 1952, was recently completed. The seven-story, 375,000-sf structure houses 26 operating rooms, four of which are hybrid size to accommodate additional equipment and technology for newly developed procedures.
Multifamily Housing | Oct 28, 2024
A case for mid-rise: How multifamily housing can reshape our cities
Often referred to as “five-over-ones,” the mid-rise apartment type is typically comprised of five stories of apartments on top of a concrete “podium” of ground-floor retail. The main criticism of the “five-over-one” is that they are often too predictable.
Sports and Recreational Facilities | Oct 24, 2024
Stadium renovation plans unveiled for Boston’s National Women’s Soccer League
A city-owned 75-year-old stadium in Boston’s historic Franklin Park will be renovated for a new National Women’s Soccer League team. The park, designed by Fredrick Law Olmsted in the 1880s, is the home of White Stadium, which was built in 1949 and has since fallen into disrepair.
Laboratories | Oct 23, 2024
From sterile to stimulating: The rise of community-centric life sciences campuses
To distinguish their life sciences campuses, developers are partnering with architectural and design firms to reimagine life sciences facilities as vibrant, welcoming destinations. By emphasizing four key elements—wellness, collaboration, biophilic design, and community integration—they are setting their properties apart.
