Much has been made lately about converting vacant office space to laboratory use. However, with growing inventory in warehouse space as the distribution center market flattens, adaptive reuse of available warehouse space for life sciences applications is a concept that is coming to the fore. While it is not a simple conversion, it is easier than office space. This reallocation commands higher rent which is compelling for owners or developers who are facing current and future vacancies. This conversion can also be applied to laboratory cold storage, cGMP storage, or cGMP production.
What makes warehouse space ideal for conversion to laboratory use?
Warehouse space is essentially a large empty shell with open space and high ceilings which, ideally, is placed along major routes and supply chain corridors. These factors make it ideal for lab conversions. For office to lab, you may encounter slab-to-slab height restrictions that squeeze the ability to fit in the actual lab space requirements. Plus, the infrastructure, like ventilation, plumbing and power that is essential to a functioning life science application could be restricted.
Warehouse layouts provide space flexibility that can be used for multiple purposes, such as lab space for research, areas for product development or production, warehouse space for storage and on-site testing facilities all under one massive roof. Any one of which could be the entirety of the facility.
While it may be ideal on paper to initiate a conversion, there are important considerations that a developer should understand from the onset of a potential project which can drive up costs and could derail the project.
1. Roof structure considerations
A warehouse roofing structure does not typically allow for the use of heavy equipment that is standard in a laboratory environment, such as cooling towers or custom air handling units. Structural retrofitting is required to increase weight bearing capacities. This could involve creating a whole new structural system or, at a minimum, dropping new columns to support and distribute the weight.
In some circumstances, a standalone structural system or an interstitial space can be built within the framework of the existing warehouse which is independent of the original “shell” of the structure. This reduces the overall area that needs to be supported and gives the flexibility of a two-level system layout with mechanical and/or electrical equipment on the upper level and storage on the lower level.
Another alternative would be to run new columns all the way up through the roof and adding more steel to the structure to support the equipment above the roofline. Development of structural options must be considered for the actual use case scenario for optimal infrastructure design.
2. Air change rates
Laboratories require strict air change rates that are set by the American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers (ASHRAE), with additional requirements that may be dictated by the National Institute of Health (NIH) and the Center for Disease Control (CDC). (1) Basic lab ventilation requires 6 to 12 air changes per hour and can climb upwards of 20 air changes per hour for cGMP spaces. So, creating a 10-foot lab room versus leaving the original 23-foot warehouse height would allow for lower Cubic Feet per Minute (CFM) rates and would not create air volume inefficiency.
One way this can be achieved is by creating a ceiling lid to the new lab space. In this scenario, the ceiling is located at a certain lower elevation and sealed. Then a plenum is added above the ceiling within the space up to the deck. This will give you the required air change rates and pressurization within a more compact space which utilizes less resources, energy and money.
Additionally, plug and play modular systems—pre-built labs that include HVAC systems—can be placed directly within the warehouse structure. These “pods” are connected to a remote condensing unit on the roof with refrigerant lines to quickly create a fully contained lab. New design options are being developed all the time and will only increase the effectiveness of using older warehouse spaces for this repurpose.
3. Plumbing, gas, and power
Water, gas, and power requirements could be exponentially higher in a laboratory environment. Standard lab infrastructure will require special sinks, washing/sanitizing facilities, and waste neutralization. Not to mention the water use of the actual equipment. All of this increases the wastewater management at the location and may require a larger water line for the facility.
Gas pipelines into the warehouse may not be adequate to run HVAC operations and will need to expand to meet new capacity requirements. Electrical service may need to be replaced due to its age, reliability and lack of sufficient capacity. The facility may also require emergency power that is not currently available. All these new services will require space and capital costs to upgrade, replace or install.
In converting existing warehouses to lab type spaces, some owners have chosen to provide for future flexibility by providing scalable infrastructure now. This prepares for additional capacities in case of a future retrofit that requires greater volumes later.
Do your due diligence
Exploration of this kind of facility conversion, and new market pursuits, requires due diligence to understand the factors that could impact whether your facility is suited for the laboratory market. We recommend starting with a facilities assessment study of your warehouse to have a full understanding of your actual structure, condition and capacity of existing equipment, and the anticipated new loads for electric, water, gas and fire protection. Based upon the assessment, a review of current local permit processes and zoning restrictions would also be recommended to see if there could be anticipated permitting delays for the conversion. From there, a developer/owner can truly determine if increased rental income and tenant occupancy outweighs the conversion costs to a life sciences piece of real estate.
1. Laboratory News – “Converting offices to laboratory space – understanding the needs of the LSCG sector” – Steven Anderson, Jonathan Andrew - 6/2021
Related Stories
School Construction | Oct 31, 2022
Claremont McKenna College science center will foster integrated disciplinary research
The design of the Robert Day Sciences Center at Claremont McKenna College will support “a powerful, multi-disciplinary, computational approach to the grand socio-scientific challenges and opportunities of our time—gene, brain, and climate,” says Hiram E. Chodosh, college president.
Higher Education | Oct 24, 2022
Wellesley College science complex modernizes facility while preserving architectural heritage
A recently completed expansion and renovation of Wellesley College’s science complex yielded a modernized structure for 21st century STEM education while preserving important historical features.
Laboratories | Oct 5, 2022
Bigger is better for a maturing life sciences sector
CRB's latest report predicts more diversification and vertical integration in research and production.
Laboratories | Sep 12, 2022
Lab space scarcity propels construction demand in life sciences sector
In its 2021 Life Sciences Real Estate Outlook, JLL predicted that access to talent would be a primary concern for an industry sector that had been growing by leaps and bounds. A year later, talent still guides real estate decisions. But market conditions of a different sort were cooling the biotech field: namely, investors that have soured on startups which underperformed after going public. What this means for new construction and renovation going forward is unpredictable, as the drivers behind life sciences’ surge are still palpable.
| Sep 2, 2022
New UMass Medical School building enables expanded medical class sizes, research labs
A new nine-story, 350,000 sf biomedical research and education facility under construction at the University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School in Worcester, Mass., will accommodate larger class sizes and extensive lab space.
Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022
Top 70 Science + Technology Facility Contractors + CM Firms 2022
Whiting-Turner, Hensel Phelps, DPR Construction, and Skanska USA top the rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility contractors and construction management (CM) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022
Top 70 Science + Technology Facility Engineering + EA Firms 2022
Jacobs, CRB, Fluor, and Affiliated Engineers Inc. head the rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022
Top 100 Science + Technology Facility Architecture + AE Firms 2022
HDR, Flad Architects, Gensler, and DGA top the rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facility architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022
Top 45 Laboratory Facility Contractors and Construction Management Firms for 2022
Whiting-Turner, Hensel Phelps, McCarthy, and STO Building Group top the ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) laboratory facility contractors and construction management (CM) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2022
Top 55 Laboratory Facility Engineering + EA Firms for 2022
Jacobs, Affiliated Engineers Inc., Burns & McDonnell, and WSP top the ranking of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) laboratory facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.