This past April, more than 500 AEC professionals—many from Giants 300 firms—gathered in Boston for BIMForum. Now in its ninth year, the group, which is co-sponsored by AGC and AIA, brings together tech-minded professionals twice yearly to discuss how BIM/VDC tools and advanced workflows are being used to enhance collaboration of the Building Team.
Of the 20-plus presentations at the Boston event, one stood out as being particularly indicative of emerging trends in the BIM/VDC field—namely cloud-based data sharing, rapid iterative design and analysis, and cross-discipline, cross-company collaboration.
In their presentation (http://tinyurl.com/BIMForumTT), Thornton Tomasetti’s Ben Howes and Matthew Naugle demonstrated how their firm is building specialized, cloud-hosted BIM models on select projects that enable rapid structural analysis and feedback for the architectural teams.
As Howes and Naugle describe it, the model has the ability to share certain high-level inputs and outputs—including geometry rationalization, cost, and environmental and operational performance—with the design team. As designers make changes, the model reads the updated BIM data, runs the desired analysis, and then returns analysis feedback automatically—all without the need for exchanging full 3D models. The result is a near-real-time, iterative design process that greatly improves the conceptual and schematic design phases.
Giants 300 coverage of BIM brought to you by AGC of America www.agc.org.
“Iteration is great, but it can take too long,” said Naugle. “Using the cloud to connect the architectural and engineering teams, we’re able to extract information out of the model that’s relevant to each other and share it in real time.”
CUSTOM API DEVELOPMENT
Also at BIMForum, Stantec’s BIM R&D Leader Robert Manna demonstrated how the firm is enhancing its BIM solutions through the development of custom API-based applications. Its latest creation, PathFinder, automates the computation of walking distances and straight-line distances between rooms in a BIM model. Developed in partnership with BIM consultant Boost Your BIM, the program enables Stantec’s design teams to analyze a proposed design within a few hours, versus days, said Manna.
“Manually identifying these paths and measuring walking distances between hundreds of rooms would be a tedious, time-consuming, and error-prone task,” said Manna. The program is especially helpful on hospital projects, but could be used for designing airport terminals, classroom buildings, and labs, as well as for campus planning and life-safety applications, he said.
SOM’s Jason Chen, Senior Digital Design Specialist, and Sebastian Claussnitzer, Architectural Designer, previewed the firm’s integrated data model approach for early-phase collaboration between architectural, structural engineering, and sustainable engineering teams. Using custom scripting, the firm can link and share numerous project data sources—from spreadsheets and early project models to spec sheets, drawings, and performance analysis—between multiple team members.
“There’s data everywhere, but it doesn’t work well with everything,” said Chen. The key is to have the most up-to-date data on every facet of the project to feed an iterative design process. For example, SOM’s enclosure and core design teams can each work in their tool of choice and cooperatively develop a single information model for a project. By accessing the same model, the different disciplines can impart their knowledge to the model, simultaneously informing and enriching the design, according to Chen and Claussnitzer.
For more on the BIMForum Boston event, including videos and abstracts of the presentations, visit: http://bimforum.org/2014/04/28/boston-bimforum-presentations-2.
Top BIM Architecture Firms
Rank | Company | 2013 BIM Revenue |
1 | Gensler | $733,073,587 |
2 | HOK | 388,550,000 |
3 | Skidmore, Owings & Merrill | 317,799,079 |
4 | HDR | 287,850,000 |
5 | Perkins+will | 267,270,000 |
6 | Stantec | 211,893,190 |
7 | CannonDesign | 167,000,000 |
8 | SmithGroupJJR | 120,100,000 |
9 | ZGF Architects | 102,457,917 |
10 | Corgan | 85,587,635 |
11 | Kohn Pedersen Fox Associates | 83,905,764 |
12 | Hammel, Green and Abrahamson | 78,606,000 |
13 | Flad Architects | 77,200,000 |
14 | EYP Architecture & Engineering | 75,000,000 |
15 | Page | 65,000,000 |
16 | Perkins Eastman | 62,000,000 |
17 | DLR Group | 60,528,000 |
18 | Clark Nexsen | 59,816,750 |
19 | SHW Group | 56,587,000 |
20 | Gresham, Smith and Partners | 54,100,000 |
21 | Fentress Architects | 46,671,008 |
22 | Ennead Architects | 44,949,000 |
23 | WHR Architects | 41,166,427 |
24 | Harley Ellis Devereaux | 39,700,000 |
25 | Shepley Bulfinch | 38,936,700 |
26 | Ballinger | 38,780,911 |
27 | BSA LifeStructures | 36,345,640 |
28 | Kirksey | 33,697,650 |
29 | Moseley Architects | 32,000,000 |
30 | EwingCole | 31,300,000 |
31 | MulvannyG2 Architecture | 31,135,000 |
32 | Moody Nolan | 30,240,000 |
33 | Ziegler Cooper | 29,310,545 |
34 | LS3P | 28,010,579 |
35 | CO Architects | 27,700,000 |
36 | Payette | 27,516,095 |
37 | Cuningham Group Architecture | 27,399,469 |
38 | Morris Architects | 26,188,000 |
39 | CTA Architects Engineers | 25,202,418 |
40 | Array Architects | 24,500,000 |
41 | WDG Architecture | 24,409,600 |
42 | Cooper Carry | 24,224,325 |
43 | Eppstein Uhen Architects | 24,028,348 |
44 | Adrian Smith + Gordon Gill Architecture | 23,902,688 |
45 | OZ Architecture | 23,400,000 |
46 | LPA | 22,036,937 |
47 | Hord Coplan Macht | 21,614,769 |
48 | FKP Architects | 21,300,000 |
49 | Francis Cauffman | 21,036,087 |
50 | FreemanWhite | 20,967,716 |
51 | FGM Architects | 20,651,412 |
52 | Heery International | 20,553,000 |
53 | Cambridge Seven Associates | 20,118,000 |
54 | Wilson Architects | 20,000,000 |
55 | Westlake Reed Leskosky | 18,975,000 |
56 | Integrus Architecture | 18,156,275 |
57 | Albert Kahn Associates | 18,000,000 |
58 | FXFOWLE Architects | 17,904,148 |
59 | Parkhill, Smith & Cooper | 17,881,350 |
60 | Hoefer Wysocki Architecture | 17,200,000 |
61 | NTD Architecture | 17,004,000 |
62 | Fanning/Howey Associates | 16,700,000 |
63 | Hnedak Bobo Group | 16,540,000 |
64 | LMN Architects | 16,248,300 |
65 | NORR | 15,427,588 |
66 | Lord Aeck Sargent | 15,153,439 |
67 | HNTB Corp. | 14,745,958 |
68 | Symmes Maini & McKee Associates | 14,020,000 |
69 | NAC|Architecture | 13,691,745 |
70 | Legat Architects | 13,570,000 |
71 | Quattrocchi Kwok Architects | 13,500,000 |
72 | Harvard Jolly Architecture | 13,280,400 |
73 | Ratio Architects | 13,000,000 |
74 | Wight & Company | 12,955,000 |
75 | Ware Malcomb | 12,000,000 |
76 | BLDD Architects | 11,800,000 |
77 | Beyer Blinder Belle | 11,791,980 |
78 | BRPH | 11,500,201 |
79 | GBBN Architects | 11,321,400 |
80 | Slaterpaull Architects | 11,055,479 |
81 | BLTa | 10,200,000 |
82 | RBB Architects | 9,945,200 |
83 | RS&H | 9,800,000 |
84 | H+L Architecture | 9,700,000 |
85 | Davis Brody Bond | 9,367,914 |
86 | Vocon | 9,203,152 |
87 | VOA Associates | 9,072,145 |
88 | Hastings+Chivetta Architects | 9,046,573 |
89 | DesignGroup | 8,798,070 |
90 | MBH Architects | 8,500,000 |
91 | Taylor Design | 8,330,000 |
92 | LaBella Associates | 8,303,381 |
93 | LBL Architects | 8,000,000 |
94 | SchenkelShultz Architecture | 7,959,562 |
95 | Becker Morgan Group | 7,872,309 |
96 | Anderson Mikos Architects | 7,750,000 |
97 | Margulies Perruzzi Architects | 7,664,876 |
98 | Ashley McGraw Architects | 7,512,996 |
99 | FitzGerald Associates Architects | 6,022,176 |
100 | Urban Design Group | 5,750,000 |
101 | Baskervill | 5,699,634 |
102 | Bergmann Associates | 5,610,000 |
103 | SEI Design Group | 5,461,000 |
104 | FRCH Design Worldwide | 5,216,000 |
105 | Goettsch Partners | 5,030,000 |
106 | PBK | 4,760,000 |
107 | WD Partners | 4,671,000 |
108 | BBS Architects | 4,480,778 |
109 | Good Fulton & Farrell | 4,192,972 |
110 | TK Architects | 4,192,048 |
111 | KZF Design | 3,510,582 |
112 | Schrader Group Architecture | 3,385,464 |
113 | Carrier Johnson + Culture | 3,204,174 |
114 | Rosser International | 3,068,066 |
115 | DLA Architects | 2,824,930 |
Top BIM Engineering Firms
Rank | Company | 2013 BIM Revenue |
1 | Jacobs | $3,500,056,500 |
2 | URS Corp. | 260,646,956 |
3 | Arup | 200,593,789 |
4 | Thornton Tomasetti | 110,229,051 |
5 | SSOE Group | 108,776,674 |
6 | Leidos | 68,080,000 |
7 | Vanderweil Engineers | 64,267,000 |
8 | KPFF Consulting Engineers | 60,000,000 |
9 | Burns & McDonnell | 60,000,000 |
10 | KJWW Engineering Consultants | 53,874,750 |
11 | CRB | 50,000,000 |
12 | BR+A Consulting Engineers | 46,000,000 |
13 | Henderson Engineers | 40,445,464 |
14 | Affiliated Engineers | 39,413,000 |
15 | Walter P Moore and Associates | 38,940,592 |
16 | Magnusson Klemencic Associates | 38,546,234 |
17 | TTG | 37,516,550 |
18 | TLC Engineering for Architecture | 34,807,545 |
19 | M-E Engineers | 33,802,000 |
20 | Dewberry | 31,610,437 |
21 | CCRD Partners | 24,000,000 |
22 | Heapy Engineering | 22,827,630 |
23 | H&A Architects & Engineers | 22,500,000 |
24 | Hixson Architecture, Engineering, Interiors | 18,000,000 |
25 | Smith Seckman Reid | 18,000,000 |
26 | Syska Hennessy Group | 17,282,931 |
27 | STV | 15,635,000 |
28 | Paulus, Sokolowski and Sartor | 14,500,000 |
29 | DeSimone Consulting Engineers | 13,828,500 |
30 | Integrated Design Group | 13,033,800 |
31 | I. C. Thomasson Associates | 12,500,000 |
32 | Interface Engineering | 12,087,161 |
33 | Barge Waggoner Sumner & Cannon | 11,000,000 |
34 | RDK Engineers | 10,600,000 |
35 | Graef | 10,000,000 |
36 | Zak Companies | 9,776,949 |
37 | Environmental Systems Design | 9,489,362 |
38 | Glumac | 9,247,037 |
39 | Dunham Associates | 8,000,000 |
40 | Ross & Baruzzini | 8,000,000 |
41 | M/E Engineering | 6,825,000 |
42 | Newcomb & Boyd | 6,750,070 |
43 | Simpson Gumpertz & Heger | 6,000,000 |
44 | Rist-Frost-Shumway Engineering | 5,000,000 |
45 | Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers | 4,178,299 |
46 | KLH Engineers | 4,007,920 |
47 | Walker Parking Consultants | 4,000,000 |
48 | Sparling | 3,755,276 |
49 | Highland Associates | 3,500,000 |
50 | Joseph R. Loring & Associates | 3,500,000 |
51 | H.F. Lenz | 3,375,000 |
52 | CJL Engineering | 3,250,000 |
53 | Apogee Consulting Group | 2,848,268 |
54 | Primera Engineers | 2,300,000 |
55 | KCI Technologies | 1,795,000 |
56 | RMF Engineering | 1,750,000 |
57 | Wick Fisher White | 1,123,000 |
58 | Wallace Engineering | 1,100,000 |
59 | GHT Limited | 1,100,000 |
60 | Aon Fire Protection Engineering Corp. | 1,000,000 |
61 | ThermalTech Engineering | 1,000,000 |
Top BIM Construction Firms
Rank | Company | 2013 BIM Revenue |
1 | Turner Construction | $6,054,743,555 |
2 | Skanska USA | 3,273,528,571 |
3 | Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., The | 3,247,155,346 |
4 | Gilbane | 2,963,000,000 |
5 | McCarthy Holdings | 2,492,000,000 |
6 | PCL Construction | 2,491,483,943 |
7 | Hensel Phelps | 2,204,800,000 |
8 | Clark Group | 1,829,229,513 |
9 | Lend Lease | 1,753,678,000 |
10 | Hoffman Construction | 1,715,000,000 |
11 | JE Dunn Construction | 1,646,271,199 |
12 | Holder Construction | 1,545,000,000 |
13 | DPR Construction | 1,524,119,623 |
14 | Mortenson Construction | 1,475,739,000 |
15 | Walsh Group, The | 1,426,945,665 |
16 | Balfour Beatty US | 1,229,173,292 |
17 | Brasfield & Gorrie | 1,212,166,066 |
18 | Walbridge | 1,006,640,000 |
19 | Structure Tone | 945,622,800 |
20 | Clayco | 912,000,000 |
21 | Hunt Construction Group | 800,000,000 |
22 | Austin Commercial | 717,638,446 |
23 | Hathaway Dinwiddie Construction | 670,000,000 |
24 | James G. Davis Construction | 637,988,856 |
25 | Suffolk Construction | 608,076,165 |
26 | Power Construction | 600,000,000 |
27 | C.W. Driver | 553,391,000 |
28 | Messer Construction | 546,119,899 |
29 | Beck Group, The | 507,356,062 |
30 | Yates Companies, The | 501,700,000 |
31 | HITT Contracting | 495,000,000 |
32 | Sundt Construction | 466,859,585 |
33 | Gray Construction | 463,300,000 |
34 | LPCiminelli | 376,556,669 |
35 | Pepper Construction | 355,981,000 |
36 | Hoar Construction | 346,337,000 |
37 | Linbeck Group | 340,500,000 |
38 | Weitz Company, The | 318,980,698 |
39 | Consigli Construction | 312,401,459 |
40 | Manhattan Construction | 301,916,000 |
41 | Flintco | 300,200,000 |
42 | Adolfson & Peterson Construction | 297,116,533 |
43 | Rodgers Builders | 270,274,731 |
44 | Shawmut Design and Construction | 225,000,000 |
45 | Hill & Wilkinson | 202,421,000 |
46 | O'Neil Industries/W.E. O'Neil | 201,011,969 |
47 | W. M. Jordan Company | 200,777,657 |
48 | Clune Construction | 197,547,422 |
49 | Haselden Construction | 190,679,924 |
50 | James McHugh Construction | 178,861,429 |
51 | Kraus-Anderson Construction | 178,000,000 |
52 | Robins & Morton | 170,486,931 |
53 | Absher Construction | 154,118,699 |
54 | Alberici Constructors | 152,455,102 |
55 | Fortis Construction | 145,000,000 |
56 | LeChase Construction Services | 138,000,000 |
57 | STV | 135,207,000 |
58 | Choate Construction | 116,059,660 |
59 | Paric Corp. | 85,000,000 |
60 | Wight & Company | 82,964,000 |
61 | Coakley & Williams Construction | 73,478,546 |
62 | Carlson Design Construct | 71,400,000 |
63 | Hill International | 65,000,000 |
64 | KBE Building Corp. | 57,842,462 |
65 | Leopardo Companies | 49,138,262 |
66 | New South Construction | 46,333,000 |
67 | Heery International | 36,298,930 |
68 | S. M. Wilson & Co. | 35,138,418 |
69 | Astorino | 33,349,068 |
70 | Harkins Builders | 22,200,000 |
71 | BlueScope Construction | 17,849,218 |
72 | Bomel Construction | 14,418,772 |
73 | Stalco Construction | 5,600,000 |
74 | Batson-Cook | 4,587,582 |
Read BD+C's full 2014 Giants 300 Report
Related Stories
AEC Tech | Oct 3, 2024
4 ways AI impacts building design beyond dramatic imagery
Kristen Forward, Design Technology Futures Leader, NBBJ, shows four ways the firm is using AI to generate value for its clients.
Digital Twin | Aug 21, 2024
Digital twins: Transforming operations for greater efficiency
While efforts to improve building efficiency have been iterative, recent advancements have significantly enhanced the interaction between facility managers, building owners, and their facilities.
Affordable Housing | Aug 7, 2024
The future of affordable housing may be modular, AI-driven, and made of mushrooms
Demolished in 1989, The Phoenix Ironworks Steel Factory left a five-acre hole in West Oakland, Calif. After sitting vacant for nearly three decades, the site will soon become utilized again in the form of 316 affordable housing units.
Great Solutions | Jul 23, 2024
41 Great Solutions for architects, engineers, and contractors
AI ChatBots, ambient computing, floating MRIs, low-carbon cement, sunshine on demand, next-generation top-down construction. These and 35 other innovations make up our 2024 Great Solutions Report, which highlights fresh ideas and innovations from leading architecture, engineering, and construction firms.
Virtual Reality | Jul 8, 2024
Can a VR-enabled AEC firm transform your project?
With the aid of virtual reality and three-dimensional visualization technologies, designers, consultants, and their clients can envision a place as though the project were in a later stage.
Affordable Housing | May 30, 2024
General contractor’s keys to a successful affordable housing project
General contractors can have tremendous influence over a project’s success in terms of schedule, budget, and quality. However, to ensure a project is put on this path, there are a few factors that must be considered.
AEC Tech | Apr 30, 2024
Lack of organizational readiness is biggest hurdle to artificial intelligence adoption
Managers of companies in the industrial sector, including construction, have bought the hype of artificial intelligence (AI) as a transformative technology, but their organizations are not ready to realize its promise, according to research from IFS, a global cloud enterprise software company. An IFS survey of 1,700 senior decision-makers found that 84% of executives anticipate massive organizational benefits from AI.
AEC Innovators | Apr 26, 2024
National Institute of Building Sciences announces Building Innovation 2024 schedule
The National Institute of Building Sciences is hosting its annual Building Innovation conference, May 22-24 at the Capital Hilton in Washington, D.C. BI2024 brings together everyone who impacts the built environment: government agencies, contractors, the private sector, architects, scientists, and more.
BIM and Information Technology | Mar 11, 2024
BIM at LOD400: Why Level of Development 400 matters for design and virtual construction
As construction projects grow more complex, producing a building information model at Level of Development 400 (LOD400) can accelerate schedules, increase savings, and reduce risk, writes Stephen E. Blumenbaum, PE, SE, Walter P Moore's Director of Construction Engineering.
AEC Tech | Mar 9, 2024
9 steps for implementing digital transformation in your AEC business
Regardless of a businesses size and type, digital solutions like workflow automation software, AI-based analytics, and integrations can significantly enhance efficiency, productivity, and competitiveness.