Check out this excellent article (July 28, 2019) from the Chicago Tribune’s Darcell Rockett:
It details how the city of Chicago and nonprofit groups partnered to build three libraries plus affordable housing in underserved neighborhoods.
It’s a great example of “P3,” or public-private partnerships, and the best use of precious city land. Not only do residents get an excellent place to live at reasonable cost, they can stroll downstairs and get a book or a DVD, take part in the libraries’ public programs, or just hang out.
I’m particularly fond of the new Independence branch of the CPL, designed by the eminent Chicago architect John Ronan (who also designed the magnificent Poetry Center—check it out next time you’re in Chicago). Independence replaced a branch that was—I hate to say this, but it’s true—mercifully destroyed in a fire a few years ago. It was, as Bette Davis would say, a dump, and now has risen from the ashes.
We’ve written about other local governments following this model (see “Concentrated redevelopment: Apartment complex takes mixed-use to the next level”).
San Bernardino County, Calif., worked with Related California (developer) and Withee Malcolm (architect) on a mixed-use collaboration to build a beautiful library and multigenerational affordable housing in a previously neglected neighborhood of the county. It’s all part of San Bernardino’s strategic plan to encourage economic development in the huge county’s unincorporated areas, which have traditionally been slighted when it comes to public funding.
But why stop at “library-housing P3s”? What about co-developing public schools and affordable housing in a new kind of mixed use? Such a P3 could give priority for housing to young, underpaid teachers and other public servants—police, fire fighters, city workers. See my editorial supporting this concept (“Put air rights to better use”), based on the work of C. Kat Grimsley, PhD, who directs the master’s in real estate program at George Mason University.
Civic governments everywhere are strapped for funding. Leveraging development dollars from the private sector in public-private partnerships provides a solution where everyone wins, most notably the tenants and the public.
Are you using P3s in imaginative ways? I’d love to hear from you: rcassidy@sgcmail.com
More from Author
Rob Cassidy | Mar 30, 2020
Your turn: Has COVID-19 spelled the death knell for open-plan offices?
COVID-19 has designers worrying if open-plan offices are safe for workers.
Rob Cassidy | Mar 25, 2020
Coronavirus pandemic's impact on U.S. construction, notably the multifamily sector - 04-30-20 update
Coronavirus pandemic's impact on U.S. construction, notably the multifamily sector - 04-30-20 update
Rob Cassidy | Nov 20, 2019
Word of the Year: "climate emergency," says the Oxford English Dictionary
The Oxford Word of the Year 2019 is climate emergency.
Rob Cassidy | Nov 8, 2019
The Peloton Wars, Part III - More alternatives for apartment building owners
ProForm Studio Bike Pro review.
Rob Cassidy | Nov 1, 2019
Do car-free downtown zones work? Oslo, yes; Chicago, no
Two recent reports (October 2019) explore whether car-free downtowns really work, based on experience in Oslo, Norway, and Chicago.
Rob Cassidy | Oct 9, 2019
Multifamily developers vs. Peloton: Round 2... Fight!
Readers and experts offer alternatives to Peloton bicycles for their apartment and condo projects.
Rob Cassidy | Sep 4, 2019
Peloton to multifamily communities: Drop dead
Peloton will no longer sell its bikes to apartment communities.