flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Building Team Awards Tip Sheet

Building Team Awards

Building Team Awards Tip Sheet


By BD+C Staff | March 12, 2021

Keep this tip sheet handy when preparing your Building Team Awards entry, as these are some items on which your project will be judged. Note: Your project may not touch on all these items. This is meant to be a checklist to guide your submittal.

 

Design, Engineering and Construction Considerations (50%)
 

  • Land use planning, zoning, codes, regulations, etc.
  • Overall quality of the design
  • M/E/P innovations, fresh approaches
  • Energy/environment breakthroughs
  • Sustainable design, green building design, LEED
  • Structural engineering issues and solutions
  • Innovative construction methods, solutions
  • Construction safety (extraordinary factors)
  • Construction & demolition waste recycling efforts
  • Unusual scheduling or timing demands (and solutions)
  • Inventive use of materials; use of unusual or new materials
  • Craftsmanship, detailing, elegance of execution
  • Use of innovative technology, methods, tools
  • Patents or inventions resulting from project
  • Cost/budget issues – and evidence of resolution
  • Evidence of performance-based design
  • Security issues, unusual approaches, results
  • Wayfinding; ADA considerations
  • Commissioning results
  • Post-occupancy evaluation; evidence of owner/user satisfaction
  • Overall project quality and functionality
  • Social or cultural relevance of project
  • Other measures of success (job creation, neighborhood renewal, ADA, etc.)
  • Project complexity: Was it especially challenging? In what way?
  • Unusual owner/client requirements
  • Site planning, parking, landscaping, user access

SUMMARY: How did the project push the envelope?

 

Building Team Collaboration + Involvement of Community, End Users & Stakeholders (50%)
 

  • Evidence of extraordinary efforts to meet owner needs
  • Involvement of surrounding community, neighbors, affected stakeholders
  • Involvement of public officials, public agencies
  • Charettes, planning sessions with community, end users, other relevant stakeholders
  • Attention to surrounding environment, historic areas, community sensitivities
  • Attention to environmental issues: wetlands, open space, recreation areas, etc.
  • Extensive surveying, polling, or other techniques to gauge public opinion or gather ideas
  • Unusual “gaming” or innovative tools to assess client or end-user needs
  • Evidence of involvement of ‘less-empowered end-users’ (students in school project, nurses in hospital, minorities, disabled, etc.)
  • Overcoming unanticipated changes in the program
  • Overcoming natural disaster (flood, hurricane), man-made disaster (loss of power supply), materials shortages
  • Unusual team-based solutions to budget restrictions, value engineering
  • Unusual team-based solutions to keep project schedule on time
  • Extraordinary effort in hiring women- or minority-owned firms
  • Special social or cultural relevance of the project
  • Additional measures of community-related success (jobs, neighborhood renewal, etc.)
  • Special aspects related to user-occupant-tenant needs

SUMMARY: Did the project perform a public good? How?

Related Stories

Building Team Awards | Jun 11, 2019

Learning by doing: Students took an active role in the design of the Bay Area's d.tech high school

Gold Award: D.tech had been occupying temporary spaces that were hardly suited for design thinking.

Building Team Awards | Jun 10, 2019

Technology showcase: PTC's new digs combine lively workspaces with exhibits for its products and platforms

Gold Award: PTC began its fitout even as 121 Seaport was still under construction.

Building Team Awards | Jun 7, 2019

Fast delivery: Construction of McDonald's global headquarters was completed in under seven months

Gold Award: The building has a remarkably diverse array of spaces that include “work neighborhoods.”

Building Team Awards | Jun 7, 2019

Unifying force: A place where a million Tulsans can connect, one by one

Platinum Award: Gathering Place is a 66½-acre public park and playground serving the nearly one million residents of greater Tulsa, Okla.

Building Team Awards | May 24, 2018

Green machine: Janet Durgin Guild and Commons at Sonoma Academy

Honorable Mention: A college prep school gets an uber-green maker space and cooking lab.

Building Team Awards | May 24, 2018

Good neighbor: Wentz Science Center at North Central College

Bronze Award: A conscientious Building Team takes steps to minimize the impact of this large-scale science center project in a historic neighborhood.

Building Team Awards | May 23, 2018

13 projects earn BD+C's 2018 Building Team Awards

Iowa’s game-changing correctional institution and Chicago’s daring hotel and sports development are among 13 projects to earn honors in BD+C’s 2018 Building Team Awards.

Building Team Awards | May 23, 2018

Engineered for extremes: Talan Towers

Bronze Award: Astana’s shimmering mixed-use towers are made to stand up to the region’s harsh, long winters.

Building Team Awards | May 22, 2018

High-tech haven: The Spark at Washington State University

Silver Award: A ‘teaching in the round’ classroom highlights this innovation hub at Washington State University’s Pullman campus.

Building Team Awards | May 22, 2018

LA's game changer: Wilshire Grand Center

Silver Award: This billion-dollar mixed-use tower will alter the Los Angeles skyline in more ways.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021