BuiltWorlds, a member network dedicated to inspiring and advancing innovation in the AEC industry, has released its 2024 Tools, Equipment, and Robotics Benchmarking Report, an annual report that presents user survey data on category-specific technology adoption and usage. The report revealed that while the industry has been slow to adopt robotic solutions en masse, there has been considerable progress in certain areas, with one provider in particular seemingly pulling ahead as the preferred provider.
“The integration of advanced tools, equipment, and robotics represents a significant leap toward modernizing and streamlining operations within the AEC industry,” wrote BuiltWorlds Research Analyst Audrey Lynch, who authored the report. “This year, we saw the highest levels of adoption in monitoring robotics and service/labor robotics, two of the four main categories we've identified in construction robotics”
Nearly two-thirds of contractors surveyed, who cited use of robotics on jobsites, are either using monitoring and/or service/labor robotics. Thirty-five percent admitted to using autonomous heavy equipment, and a paltry 6% prefabrication robotics.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a0d67/a0d67ac5c895ab2f2267239d7db2f4e562dd9b70" alt="Construction industry robotics usage"
“There is a confluence of factors that are all working in tandem to drive increased utilization of robotics in the construction industry. The primary push forward is an increasingly prominent labor shortage in the industry,” said Tyler Sewall, Senior Director of Research for BuiltWorlds. He added, “Meanwhile, the typical barriers to adoption are slowly waning, leading to an environment more receptive to robotic solutions. The increased use of BIM, improved operability and accuracy, improved data collection and utilization, and an industry more culturally inclined to new technologies have all yielded material increases in the use of robotics.”
A Leading Provider in Dusty Robotics
Among the multiple robotic technology solutions providers named in the report, one provider stood out as both most implemented as well as highest rated: Dusty Robotics, a company that builds robots to help in laying out jobsites.
“Dusty Robotics consistently outperforms the industry average across all evaluated criteria, indicating its strong market position,” Lynch wrote. “With top ratings in adoption/utilization, ease of use, coordination with site activities, and data integration, the solution demonstrates its effectiveness and user-friendliness. It also excels in installation/performance speed and quality (tied with Civ Robotics), highlighting its reliability and efficiency.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8ad47/8ad478f92b11e403adfb37865a674aab5c4972be" alt="Construction industry-identified robotics solution implementation rates"
Why ‘Better Adoption’ Isn’t ‘Mass Adoption’
But while this year’s report shows wider scale adoption than years previous, particularly in the areas of service/labor and monitoring robotics, the industry has yet to embrace robotics into its mainstream.
“As much as the case for robotics continues to grow,” Sewall said, “there are, frankly, still so many reasons why robotics adoption isn't widespread, and may not be for a while.”
For one, most robotic solutions, he explained, require some variety of building model in order to operate.
“BIM, while well-adopted in some markets, is significantly underutilized in large portions of the industry.”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2f5a1/2f5a16f70678ba3057f223604596b7e1d57abda3" alt="Construction organizations that use robotics solutions"
Another reason, Sewall shared, is that robotics, like any new technology, comes with a certain amount of risk—which is a problem in a traditionally risk averse industry.
“With layout robots, for instance, the second question is always, ‘Who owns the layout,’” he explained. “If the general contractor dictates how layout will be done, does that change the owner of the risk?”
Finally, and most obviously, is the cost.
“The up-front costs of robotic solutions are expensive,” Sewall said. “While larger companies can support these costs, many small- and mid-sized contractors simply cannot support any additional spend.”
Still, while there remain significant barriers to mainstream adoption of construction robotics, the data seems to indicate a slow acceptance and utilization of a technology that represents a massive boost to safety, efficiency, and productivity.
Related Stories
AEC Tech | Feb 28, 2018
Nine tips to bridge the cybernetic design gap
Unlike other technologies we have seen, augmented and virtual reality are looking to have staying power in a truly disruptive way.
AEC Tech | Jan 29, 2018
thyssenkrupp tests self-driving robot for ‘last mile’ delivery of elevator parts
“With driverless delivery robots, we could fill a gap and get spare parts from our warehouses to the jobsite faster,” said thyssenkrupp SVP Ivo Siebers.
AEC Tech | Jan 25, 2018
Four high-tech solutions to mitigate theft on the jobsite
Geo-fencing and drone surveillance are among the tech solutions for protecting jobsites from asset loss.
BD+C University Course | Jan 2, 2018
The art and science of rendering: Visualization that sells architecture [AIA course]
3D artist Ramy Hanna offers guidelines and tricks-of-the-trade to ensure that project artwork is a stunning depiction of the unbuilt space.
Reconstruction & Renovation | Dec 21, 2017
Interactive map includes detailed information on historic New York City buildings
The New York City Landmarks Preservation Commission launched a new, enhanced version of its interactive map, Discover NYC Landmarks.
AEC Tech | Dec 20, 2017
6 CFD post-processing tips to improve visualization productivity and quality
Southland Engineering’s Abdullah Karimi offers helpful tips for making computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models more productive.
Sponsored | Building Team | Nov 3, 2017
4 strategies for marketing your AEC firm
Having a clearly defined competitive brand and a fine-tuned marketing approach can give your firm a significant competitive advantage.
Sponsored | AEC Tech | Oct 19, 2017
3 reasons why your firm needs cloud software
For firms looking to propel their architectural design services to new heights and levels of sophistication, a consolidated cloud-based platform is a valuable asset.
AEC Tech | Oct 6, 2017
How professional bias can sabotage industry transformation
Professional bias can take the form of change-resistant thinking that can keep transformational or innovative ambitions at bay. Tech consultant Nate Miller presents three kinds of bias that often emerge when a professional is confronted with new technology.
AEC Tech | Aug 25, 2017
Software cornucopia: Jacksonville Jaguars’ new practice facility showcases the power of computational design
The project team employed Revit, Rhino, Grasshopper, Kangaroo, and a host of other software applications to design and build this uber-complex sports and entertainment facility.