More than 11% of the worldâs electricity is produced by 447 commercial nuclear power reactors operating in 31 countries. The U.S. alone generates just under one-fifth of its electricityâ19.7%âfrom 99 nuclear reactors operating in 30 states that produce 805.3 billion kilowatt-hours of power. At the end of last year, there were 61 nuclear plants under construction worldwide, the equivalent of 16% of existing capacity, and another 160 that have been firmly planned.
These statistics, from the World Nuclear Association and the Nuclear Energy Institute, would suggest that nuclear powerâdespite ongoing issues related to safety, security, regulations, and radioactive waste storageâis an ascending alternative to fossil fuels as a source of low-carbon power in a world that is increasing concerned about the impact of climate change.
In an opinion piece that Forbes published in early September, nuclear advocate and scientist James Conca noted that two nuclear power plants near Houstonâwhich provide 2,700 MW of power to two million customers in the areaâstayed fully operational during Hurricane Harvey, which caused oil refineries to shut down.
The next generation of nuclear plants will be smallerâthe plants under construction range from 70 to 1,750 gross MWsâand resilient. But groups that promote nuclear as an essential ingredient of any cocktail of alternative energy sources âdonât have a large bank of imagery to draw uponâ to show the public nuclearâs capabilities, says Suzanne Baker, a spokesperson for Third Way, a neoliberal think tank in Washington D.C.
Earlier this year, Third Way commissioned Gensler to come up with sketches and renderings that can be used to explain the role that advanced reactors could play in a variety of energy systems that enable the world to reach its goals for reducing CO2 emissions. Those renderings were exhibited at D.C.âs Fathom Gallery on Oct. 28. The images can be downloaded from Third Wayâs website.
Â
The rendering of a transit hub, where a nuclear reactor provides zero-emissions power for rail and electric vehicles. Image: Third Way
Â
Gensler worked up images for six âscenariosâ where nuclear could provide low-carbon power. These include
âąA remote arctic community, off the power grid, where electricity is extremely pricey;
âąA clean transit hub, where a small reactor powers rail lines, personal electric vehicles, shared autonomous vehicles, and electric buses;
âąGrowing communities in the developing world where large-scale reactors provide power, and whose excess capacity is used for an onsite desalination plant to provide clean water;
âąA high-temperature reactor to power and heat for local industries;
âąA Naval base, where advanced reactors generate around the clock electricity and power ships docked at port; and
âąPowering data centers, upon which many of lifeâs daily functions are increasingly dependent. Â
While much of the growth in nuclear energy technology is occurring overseas, specifically in Russia, China, and the United Arab Emirates, Third Way believes the renderings can help spur innovation in the U.S.âwhich in recent years has all but ceased building nuclear plants in favor of other forms of alternative energiesââand help American nuclear companies and technologies become more competitive in international energy markets,â says Baker.
She acknowledges that Genslerâs portfolio does not include a broad range of nuclear power plant designs. But, she explains, âWe wanted a fresh eye on the topic.â Baker adds that Genslerâs designs typically emphasize sustainability, so the commission âwas an alignment of values.â
Earlier this year Baker âcold calledâ Genslerâs D.C. office about its interest in this project. âOur receptionist went over the public address system and said 'would someone from the Green Team dial zero?,' â recalls Liz Resenic, LEED AP BD+C, WELL AP, a sustainability specialist at Gensler.
The firm doesnât have a âgreen team,â per se; Resenic, on its sustainability team, took the called and spoke with Baker for about 15 minutes about visualization.
At that point, Genslerâs most notable experience in the nuclear power arena was its master planning and urban design for its K.A. CARE project, which stands for the King Abdullah City for Atomic and Renewable Energy in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
The firm agreed to accept Third Wayâs commission âbecause weâre interested in being part of this conversation,â says Duncan Lyons, RIBA, LEED AP BD+C, a Senior Associate and Office Building Developers Practice Area Leader, who was the lead designer on this project. (Other Gensler associates who worked on the renderings and sketches include Gregory Plavcan, Matthew Boland, and Katie Costa.)
Â
A desert compound whose advanced nuclear reactor pumps out 1,000-plus MW of capacity that supplies a nearby growing city. Image: Third Way
Â
The project operated under a tight schedule: Visualizing sessions were conducted in August, for which Gensler pulled images from the nuclear industry as well as related examples of energy produced by hydro, solar and wind, says Lyons.
Gensler started producing the renderings and sketches in September, and completed them last month.
Baker says Third Way is targeting three audiences with its renderings: policy makers, the press, and the nuclear sector itself, which could use the illustrations in debates about the efficacy of nuclear power.
Related Stories
| Jan 7, 2015
Department of Energy seeks public input on definition for zero-energy buildings
A broadly accepted market definition of zero-energy buildings is foundational to efforts by governments, utilities, or private entities to recognize or incentivize zero energy buildings.Â
Smart Buildings | Jan 7, 2015
NIBS report: Small commercial buildings offer huge energy efficiency retrofit opportunities
The report identifies several barriers to investment in such retrofits, such as the costs and complexity associated with relatively small loan sizes, and issues many small-building owners have in understanding and trusting predicted retrofit outcomes.
| Dec 28, 2014
Using energy modeling to increase project value [AIA course]
This course, worth 1.0 AIA LU/HSW, explores how to increase project value through energy modeling, as well as how to conduct quick payback and net present value studies to identify which energy strategies are most viable for the project.
| Dec 19, 2014
Zaha Hadid unveils dune-shaped HQ for Emirati environmental management company
Zaha Hadid Architects released designs for the new headquarters of Emirati environmental management company Beeâah, revealing a structure that references the shape and motion of a sand dune.
| Dec 17, 2014
USGBC announces 2014 Best of Green Schools honorees
Houston's Monarch School was named the K-12 school of the year, and Western Michigan University was honored as the top higher-ed institution, based on environmental programs and education efforts.
| Nov 25, 2014
Behnisch Architekten unveils design for energy-positive building in Boston
The multi-use building for Artists For Humanity that is slated to be the largest energy positive commercial building in New England.
| Nov 12, 2014
Chesapeake Bay Foundation completes uber-green Brock Environmental Center, targets Living Building certification
More than a decade after opening its groundbreaking Philip Merrill Environmental Center, the group is back at it with a structure designed to be net-zero water, net-zero energy, and net-zero waste.
| Oct 27, 2014
Report estimates 1.2 million people experience LEED-certified retail centers daily
The "LEED In Motion: Retail" report includes USGBCâs conceptualization of the future of retail, emphasizing the economic and social benefit of green building for retailers of all sizes and types.
| Oct 15, 2014
Harvard launches âdesign-centricâ center for green buildings and cities
The impetus behind Harvard's Center for Green Buildings and Cities is what the design schoolâs dean, Mohsen Mostafavi, describes as a ârapidly urbanizing global economy,â in which cities are building new structures âon a massive scale.âÂ
| Sep 15, 2014
Sustainability rating systems: Are they doomed?
None of the hundreds of existing green building rating systems is perfect. Some of them are too documentation-heavy. Some increase short-term project cost. Some arenât rigorous enough or include contentious issues, writes HDR's Michaella Wittmann.