flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Engineering firms KJWW and TTG merge

Engineers

Engineering firms KJWW and TTG merge

Comparable in size and compatible in culture, the companies unite to present clients with greater “scale.” 


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | October 6, 2015
Engineering firms KJWW and TTG merge

Logos courtesy KJWW

Two of the nonresidential building industry’s leading engineering firms have joined forces to leverage their similar sizes and market strategies.

KJWW Engineering, based in Rock Island, Ill., and TTG Engineers, based in Pasadena, Calif., will continue to operate under their own banners, but within a newly created holding company with common management.

Ranked 11th and 14th, respectively, on BD+C’s 2014 Engineering Giants list, the firms’ combined revenues last year would have elevated them to No. 4.

The merger unites two companies with a combined 860 employees working in 25 national and five international locations. “The merger gives TTG and KJWW a larger presence throughout the U.S. and strengthens our collective dominance in the healthcare, higher education, government, entertainment, industrial, and transportation markets,” said Zareh Astrouian, PE, SE, president of TTG. Paul VanDuyne, PE, KJWW’s president, added that the merger “allows us to build on those strengths with greater geographic mobility.”

In an interview with BD+C, VanDuyne—who will be CEO of the holding company, with Astrouian its chairman— said the two firms would spend the next 15 months integrating their operational infrastructure, such as accounting, IT, etc. Over that period, the companies will keep their engineering teams intact, while integrating similar practices. VanDuyne was quick to note that the merger is not a prelude to staff reductions. “Human capital is at such a premium right now, and we would be very happy to go through this process without losing a single person.”

VanDuyne believed this merger would allow both companies to serve national end-user clients more effectively. TTG should gain from KJWW’s strengths in such areas as medical equipment planning and architectural lighting, while KJWW should benefit from TTG’s expertise in the entertainment sector. “We feel this is a great opportunity to take a look at a brand new organization. That’s a little bit extraordinary for two $50 million companies,” he said.

The firms’ executives have been discussing this merger for about a year, said VanDuyne. “It started with a phone call about getting together. We met at [KJWW’s] offices in Chicago, and it went on from there.”

KJWW and TTG announced their merger less than a month after Thornton Tomasetti merged with Weidlinger Associates. While VanDuyne didn’t think these events necessarily presaged more consolidation among engineering companies, he did note that “scale” is becoming more important for firms to be relevant to clients in such areas as BIM and sustainability.

It hasn’t been determined whether the firms would eventually operate out of a single headquarters. That seems unlikely, at least in the near future, especially when Van Duyne said “I don’t think this is the last time you’re going to hear from us about expanding across the country.”

Tags

Related Stories

Reconstruction & Renovation | Mar 16, 2017

Pols are ready to spend $1T on rebuilding America’s infrastructure. But who will pick which projects benefit?

The accounting and consulting firm PwC offers the industrial sector a five-step approach to getting more involved in this process.

Engineers | Feb 24, 2017

Understanding retro commissioning

For owners of existing buildings, retrocommissioning creates a baseline to compare future building energy consumption. 

Engineers | Feb 16, 2017

ESD's founder, Hem Gupta, passes at the age of 85

A 53-year career included engineering work on several of Chicago's iconic buildings.

Architects | Jan 4, 2017

The making of visible experts: A path for seller-doers in the AEC industry

Exceptional seller-doers have the ability to ask the right questions, and more importantly, listen.

Building Team | Jan 3, 2017

How does your firm’s hit rate stack up to the AEC competition?

If your firm is not converting at least a third of project proposals when competing for new work, it may be time to reassess your marketing tactics and processes.

High-rise Construction | Oct 26, 2016

The world’s 100 tallest buildings: Which structural engineers have worked on the most?

The top firm has worked on almost one-fifth of the 100 tallest buildings in the world.

Engineers | Oct 17, 2016

Confidence in construction markets is high among U.S. engineering leaders: ACEC survey

The American Council of Engineering Companies’ third quarter Engineering Business Index rose 6.2 points to 63.3—the largest quarter-to-quarter increase since the EBI’s inception. 

| Sep 26, 2016

RELIGIOUS FACILITY GIANTS: A ranking of the nation’s top religious sector design and construction firms

Gensler, Leo A Daly, Brasfield & Gorrie, Layton Construction, and AECOM top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest religious facility AEC firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.

Architects | Sep 21, 2016

DLR Group broadens its practice range and market penetration with addition of Westlake Reed Leskosky

The merger, say company officials, creates “a global design leader” in a consolidating industry.

Architects | Sep 15, 2016

Implicit bias: How the unconscious mind drives business decisions

Companies are tapping into the latest research in psychology and sociology to advance their diversity and inclusion efforts when it comes to hiring, promoting, compensation, and high-performance teaming, writes BD+C's David Barista.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021