Indoor waterparks are great. They allow for year-round use regardless of whether it is raining, snowing, or below freezing outside. But the main reason they exist is to allow people who live in climates that aren’t necessarily water park friendly the opportunity to join in on the fun. Given the option, wouldn’t the majority of us pick an outdoor water park to an indoor one?
It is that same line of thinking that has James Richards and his partner Ben Olschner, two Houston architects who previously worked at Herzog & de Meuron, questioning whether or not transforming the Astrodome into an indoor park and events center is really the best option. The preliminary plan for the Astrodome, as The Urban Edge blog reports, is to raise the floor and plop a 9-acre park on top, leaving the space beneath for parking or storage. With time, a conservatory could be developed that would fund a series of trails within the park.
The problem is, at least in the eyes of Richards, an indoor park is not that novel of an idea. Not only that, but the Houston area is ripe with beautiful outdoor parks and events space as it is, which begs the question, will people actually use the indoor park if it is created?
Richards doesn’t believe so. While Houston has very hot summers, the climate the rest of the year is relatively mild and perfect for outdoor activities. Richards also questions if such a large amount of plant life will even be able to thrive indoors and if restaurants and vendors would be financially viable based on the number of people who may visit the park regularly.
There are quite a few problems Richards has with the current plans. But, as is said, so easy to condemn, so hard to create. Only, Richards has taken the next step and created what he believes to be a better vision for what to do with the Astrodome.
Named “A-Dome park,” Richards, Olschner, and their partners’ proposal preserves the Astrodome while also highlighting and exposing the architectural elements that made it famous. The proposal would, for all intents and purposes, leave the Astrodome standing, while also providing open air events space beneath the dome.
Rendering courtesy of adomepark.org
How would they get the best of both worlds? By removing all non-structural surfaces on the interior and exterior of the Astrodome, leaving behind nothing but the steel skeleton, which would then be painted to prevent decay.
Additionally, the proposal calls for the removal of 1,800 parking spots (that would then be replaced by an underground parking structure), replacing them with a forest. Perhaps the most enticing part of the plan is a series of boardwalks that would circle around the dome all the way to the top of the structure, providing scenic views of the surrounding city for anyone who ventures all the way to the top. The space beneath the dome would still have electric access and could host a variety of events such as carnivals.
Besides the fact that it will most likely take more than a well-developed idea to get the county to complete change their plans on what to do with the Astrodome, there are a few other hurdles, as well.
First, the Texas Historical Commission would have to approve the plans to leave nothing but the Astrodome’s skeleton standing. Per state law, the Commission can reject any significant structural change to the building. There is also the question of finances. Richards says the project will cost $180 million, but funds can be raised via donations, money from private foundations, and endowments.
While getting the county to accept his new proposal may prove nearly impossible, Richards hopes his idea will at least show that other, more innovative options for what to do with the Astrodome exist.
Rendering courtesy of adomepark.org
Rendering courtesy of adomepark.org
To read the original story on The Urban Edge blog, click here.
To view the project’s website, including additional renderings and project details, click here.
Related Stories
Giants 400 | Jan 11, 2024
Top 40 Convention Center Architecture Firms for 2023
TVS, Populous, Arcadis North America, Gensler, and EUA top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest convention center and event facility architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report.
Cultural Facilities | Nov 21, 2023
Arizona’s Water Education Center will teach visitors about water conservation and reuse strategies
Phoenix-based architecture firm Jones Studio will design the Water Education Center for Central Arizona Project (CAP)—a 336-mile aqueduct system that delivers Colorado River water to almost 6 million people, more than 80% of the state’s population. The Center will allow the public to explore CAP’s history, operations, and impact on Arizona.
Education Facilities | Nov 9, 2023
Oakland schools’ central kitchen cooks up lessons along with 30,000 meals daily
CAW Architects recently completed a facility for the Oakland, Calif., school district that feeds students and teaches them how to grow, harvest, and cook produce grown onsite. The production kitchen at the Unified School District Central Kitchen, Instructional Farm, and Education Center, (“The Center”) prepares and distributes about 30,000 meals a day for district schools lacking their own kitchens.
Giants 400 | Nov 6, 2023
Top 65 Cultural Facility Construction Firms for 2023
Turner Construction, Clark Group, Whiting-Turner, Gilbane, and Holder Construction top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest cultural facilities sector general contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking includes revenue from all cultural building sectors, including concert venues, art galleries, museums, performing arts centers, and public libraries.
Giants 400 | Nov 6, 2023
Top 60 Cultural Facility Engineering Firms for 2023
KPFF, Arup, Thornton Tomasetti, Tetra Tech, and WSP head BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest cultural facilities sector engineering and engineering architecture (EA) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking includes revenue from all cultural building sectors, including concert venues, art galleries, museums, performing arts centers, and public libraries.
Giants 400 | Nov 6, 2023
Top 110 Cultural Facility Architecture Firms for 2023
Populous, Gensler, HGA, DLR Group, and Quinn Evans top BD+C's ranking of the nation's largest cultural facilities sector architecture and architecture engineering (AE) firms for 2023, as reported in the 2023 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking includes revenue from all cultural building sectors, including concert venues, art galleries, museums, performing arts centers, and public libraries.
Esports Arenas | Oct 10, 2023
Modular esports arena attracts more than gamers
As the esports market continues to grow to unprecedented numbers, more facilities are being developed by universities and real estate firms each year.
Adaptive Reuse | Sep 13, 2023
Houston's first innovation district is established using adaptive reuse
Gensler's Vince Flickinger shares the firm's adaptive reuse of a Houston, Texas, department store-turned innovation hub.
Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2023
Top 115 Architecture Engineering Firms for 2023
Stantec, HDR, Page, HOK, and Arcadis North America top the rankings of the nation's largest architecture engineering (AE) firms for nonresidential building and multifamily housing work, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2023 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Aug 22, 2023
2023 Giants 400 Report: Ranking the nation's largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms
A record 552 AEC firms submitted data for BD+C's 2023 Giants 400 Report. The final report includes 137 rankings across 25 building sectors and specialty categories.