flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Income-based electric bills spark debate on whether they would harm or hurt EV and heat pump adoption

Multifamily Housing

Income-based electric bills spark debate on whether they would harm or hurt EV and heat pump adoption

Californians may pay utilities based on how much they make, not just amount of power they use.


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | June 1, 2023
Image by Rebecca Moninghoff from Pixabay
Image by Rebecca Moninghoff from Pixabay

Starting in 2024, the electric bills of most Californians could be based not only on how much power they use, but also on how much money they make. Those who have higher incomes would pay more; those with lower incomes would see their electric bills decline.

A law passed last year in California requires state utility regulators to devise a plan for charging customers income-based fixed fees as part of their electric bills by July 2024. If California goes ahead with this plan, it would be the first state to enact such a change.

The income-based billing concept has provoked strong debate as advocates and opponents argue over whether such a measure would encourage or discourage adoption of sustainable technologies such as solar panels backed with battery systems, electric vehicles, and heat pumps. Opponents include supporters of green technology who fear such a change would discourage customers from investing in new technology to reduce their electricity usage, according to a report in Grist. They say higher costs spur more people to use electricity more efficiently.

Supporters of income-based electric bills say just the opposite: reducing utility costs for lower income individuals could actually encourage them to use the savings from lower bills to install heat pumps and buy EVs.

A key point in the debate revolves around cost related to things that are not linked to usage such as burying electric supply lines to reduce wildfires. Such expenditures are passed on to all customers regardless of the amount of power they consume.

Both sides can agree on one thing: customers are already fed up with rates that have been rising at three times the rate of inflation in recent years. And, escalating electric bills are almost a certainty in the foreseeable future.

Related Stories

| Jul 28, 2014

Reconstruction Sector Construction Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Structure Tone, Turner, and Gilbane top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest reconstruction contractor and construction management firms in the U.S.

| Jul 28, 2014

Reconstruction Sector Engineering Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Jacobs, URS, and Wiss, Janney, Elstner top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest reconstruction engineering and engineering/architecture firms in the U.S.

| Jul 28, 2014

Reconstruction Sector Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Stantec, HDR, and HOK top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest reconstruction architecture and architecture/engineering firms in the U.S.

| Jul 23, 2014

Architecture Billings Index up nearly a point in June

AIA reported the June ABI score was 53.5, up from a mark of 52.6 in May.

| Jul 22, 2014

Herzog & de Meuron unveil curvy concrete condo in Manhattan

Herzog & de Meuron have released renderings of their new $250 million New York building, a 12-story condominium with 88 luxury apartments. 

| Jul 21, 2014

Economists ponder uneven recovery, weigh benefits of big infrastructure [2014 Giants 300 Report]

According to expert forecasters, multifamily projects, the Panama Canal expansion, and the petroleum industry’s “shale gale” could be saving graces for commercial AEC firms seeking growth opportunities in an economy that’s provided its share of recent disappointments.

| Jul 18, 2014

Contractors warm up to new technologies, invent new management schemes [2014 Giants 300 Report]

“UAV.” “LATISTA.” “CMST.” If BD+C Giants 300 contractors have anything to say about it, these new terms may someday be as well known as “BIM” or “LEED.” Here’s a sampling of what Giant GCs and CMs are doing by way of technological and managerial innovation.

| Jul 18, 2014

Top Construction Management Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Jacobs, Barton Malow, Hill International top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest construction management and project management firms in the United States. 

| Jul 18, 2014

Top Contractors [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Turner, Whiting-Turner, Skanska top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest contractors in the United States. 

| Jul 18, 2014

Engineering firms look to bolster growth through new services, technology [2014 Giants 300 Report]

Following solid revenue growth in 2013, the majority of U.S.-based engineering and engineering/architecture firms expect more of the same this year, according to BD+C’s 2014 Giants 300 report. 

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021