One Bryant Park, also known as the Bank of America Tower, in Manhattan faces an estimated $2.4 million in annual fines when New York City’s York’s Local Law 97 goes into effect.
The potential hefty levy on this property is ironic given that it was certified LEED Platinum after it opened in 2010. An in-depth article at Bloomberg.com about this predicament illustrates the complexities owners face in addressing the law, which imposes carbon caps that are backed up by fines for non-compliance.
Passed in 2019, the law is a sweeping measure establishing emissions limits for almost 50,000 of the city’s largest buildings. The owners of an estimated 20% of these office buildings, hotels, and multifamily properties will likely face fines in 2024 when the law goes into effect. Many more buildings would face fines in 2030, when the caps will be lowered by 40%.
Part of the issue for the Bank of America Tower is a density of employees with heavy computer usage—at least on some floors—that use a lot of electricity. The owner says Local Law 97 is deeply flawed because it doesn’t distinguish between different densities and usages of properties and points out that the terms of the lease with the bank preclude him from limiting their power usage.
The Bank of America Tower had some impressive green features when it was built: a natural gas-fueled cogeneration plant for electricity that uses heat from the combustion process for additional power to operate HVAC systems, a cooling system that uses ice made overnight when power demand is lower, and a green roof. Today, when the ultimate goal is carbon neutrality, though, these features do not create the desired impact.
The details of the law are still being worked out, though, and that may bode well for the owner. There is support from some city officials to make allowances for buildings such as the Bank of America Tower that time their energy use.
Related Stories
Building Team | Oct 31, 2016
The world’s 100 tallest buildings: Who owns and has developed the most?
All but four owners/developers on the list are located in the United Arab Emirates, China, or Hong Kong.
High-rise Construction | Oct 28, 2016
The world’s 100 tallest buildings: Which contractors have worked on the most?
Only one firm has worked on more than 10 of the world’s 100 tallest buildings.
High-rise Construction | Oct 27, 2016
The world’s 100 tallest buildings: Which MEP engineers have worked on the most?
The top firm worked on over three times as many of the tallest buildings as the second place firm on the list.
High-rise Construction | Oct 26, 2016
The world’s 100 tallest buildings: Which structural engineers have worked on the most?
The top firm has worked on almost one-fifth of the 100 tallest buildings in the world.
High-rise Construction | Oct 25, 2016
That sinking feeling: Millennium Tower San Francisco is beginning to worry residents with its sinking, leaning [Updated]
Residents are beginning to question if the tower, which exists in a major earthquake fault zone, is safe.
High-rise Construction | Oct 21, 2016
The world’s 100 tallest buildings: Which architects have designed the most?
Two firms stand well above the others when it comes to the number of tall buildings they have designed.
High-rise Construction | Oct 14, 2016
Perkins+Will-designed residential towers would transform the Seattle skyline
The towers thrive on ‘creative tension’ and lean farther away from each other the higher they climb.
Wood | Oct 13, 2016
Concept from Perkins+Will could become the world’s tallest timber tower
River Beech Tower is said to be a part of a masterplan along the Chicago River.
Resiliency | Oct 5, 2016
San Francisco’s 181 Fremont will become the most earthquake-resilient building on the West Coast
The building has achieved REDi Gold Rating, resilience-based design guidelines developed by Arup that establish a new benchmark for seismic construction.
High-rise Construction | Oct 5, 2016
Plans for Hudson Yards skyscraper from Bjarke Ingels have officially been filed
The 65-story tower will be primarily office space and has an estimated development cost of $3.2 billion