After years of rumors and speculation, and with plenty of moving parts that still need to be sorted out, at least one thing is official: the St. Louis Rams are Los Angeles-bound.
The NFL owners voted in favor of the Rams’ plan of moving back to the city they called home from 1946 to 1994.
A new stadium will be built in Inglewood, Calif., on the site of the old Hollywood Park racetrack, roughly 10 miles from downtown Los Angeles. It is expected to be the league’s largest stadium in terms of area (at 8.5 million sf), and will cost between $1.8 billion and $3 billion.
The stadium will be set 100 feet into the ground with a 175-foot above ground profile. The roof will have open air on its sides with metal borders at the top, and the section over the playing field will be made of the transparent ETFE material, which is translucent but immensely strong. The stadium, which will have 70,000 seats and could expand to 100,000 with standing room only capacity, will be part of a 298-acre entertainment, retail, and housing complex.
“It's going to be so much more than going to a football game,” said Mark Williams of HKS, the firm designing the stadium, according to the Los Angeles Times. “You're going to be absorbed into the site, absorbed into the stadium, and get a very wide bandwidth of experience. It's the kind of memory people are going to cherish for a lifetime.”
The NFL is in favor of two teams moving to LA and sharing a stadium. The San Diego Chargers have the option of leaving their digs, the old Qualcomm Stadium, and joining the Rams in becoming co-tenants at the new LA stadium. They have a little more than one year to make a decision. If they decline, then the Oakland Raiders could choose to move from their home, the O.co Coliseum, and play in the new stadium with the Rams.
Meanwhile, both the Chargers and Raiders are working to stay in their current cities (at least that's what both teams’ owners are saying). If they stay, the NFL will give them each $100 million toward a new stadium.
The original plan for the Raiders and Chargers was for the teams to share a stadium, designed by Manica Architecture, in Carson, Calif. That was voted down by the owners in part because of logistics (the league would’ve had to realign divisions), and in part due to location. The $1.7 billion stadium in Carson would’ve been built on top of an old landfill.
The proposed Carson Stadium was voted down by NFL owners. Rendering: Manica Architecture
The next step for the Rams will be to determine where they’ll play next. The team’s temporary home is expected to be the LA Coliseum, a 92-year-old bowl stadium that seats more than 93,000 people. The University of Southern California’s football team currently plays there on Saturdays. Other options for the Rams include the Rose Bowl in Pasadena and Angel Stadium of Anaheim.
Los Angeles has been without football since the 1994 season, when both the Rams and Raiders moved. For the 1995 season, the Rams played at St. Louis’s Busch Stadium before moving into the now-named Edward Jones Dome later in the season. The Rams stayed at the dome through the 2015 season.
The Rams turned down a recent plan to stay in St. Louis, which included a $1 billion HOK-designed stadium on the Mississippi River.
Though financing was an issue for the proposed St. Louis stadium, it’s unclear how serious the team considered the plan. Rams’ owner Stan Kroenke bought the land in Inglewood back in early 2014, which had fueled relocation rumors since.
The proposed riverfront stadium in St. Louis. Rendering: HOK
Related Stories
| Jul 28, 2014
Reconstruction Sector Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Stantec, HDR, and HOK top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest reconstruction architecture and architecture/engineering firms in the U.S.
| Jul 23, 2014
Meet Acquario Ceará: The giant crustacean-shaped aquarium that's causing concerns
A new aquarium on Brazil's northeastern coast is designed, engineered, constructed and financed by U.S. firms and institutions.
| Jul 23, 2014
Architecture Billings Index up nearly a point in June
AIA reported the June ABI score was 53.5, up from a mark of 52.6 in May.
| Jul 21, 2014
Economists ponder uneven recovery, weigh benefits of big infrastructure [2014 Giants 300 Report]
According to expert forecasters, multifamily projects, the Panama Canal expansion, and the petroleum industry’s “shale gale” could be saving graces for commercial AEC firms seeking growth opportunities in an economy that’s provided its share of recent disappointments.
| Jul 18, 2014
Contractors warm up to new technologies, invent new management schemes [2014 Giants 300 Report]
“UAV.” “LATISTA.” “CMST.” If BD+C Giants 300 contractors have anything to say about it, these new terms may someday be as well known as “BIM” or “LEED.” Here’s a sampling of what Giant GCs and CMs are doing by way of technological and managerial innovation.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Construction Management Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Jacobs, Barton Malow, Hill International top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest construction management and project management firms in the United States.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Contractors [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Turner, Whiting-Turner, Skanska top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest contractors in the United States.
| Jul 18, 2014
Engineering firms look to bolster growth through new services, technology [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Following solid revenue growth in 2013, the majority of U.S.-based engineering and engineering/architecture firms expect more of the same this year, according to BD+C’s 2014 Giants 300 report.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Engineering/Architecture Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Jacobs, AECOM, Parsons Brinckerhoff top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest engineering/architecture firms in the United States.
| Jul 18, 2014
Top Engineering Firms [2014 Giants 300 Report]
Fluor, Arup, Day & Zimmermann top Building Design+Construction's 2014 ranking of the largest engineering firms in the United States.
