Later this month, construction is scheduled to begin on the country’s first business park specifically for unmanned aircraft.
The Associated Press reports that the first order of business for Grand Sky Development Corp., the park’s manager, will be building an eight-foot-high security chain link fence, with barbed wire at the top, to surround 200 acres adjacent to the Grand Forks Air Force Base in North Dakota.
Last week, the 1.2-million-sf Grand Sky aerospace technology park—one of six sites designated by the Federal Aviation Administration for drone testing—was awarded $5.6 million from the state. North Dakota has already invested more than $30 million at this park, which recently added Northrup Grumman as its second anchor tenant, along with General Atomics. North Dakota’s legislature has appropriated $4.4 million for Grand Sky’s future development.
The contract for constructing the fence, which had been planned since 2011, was awarded to Grand Forks-based iconHD, whose parent company is ICON Architectural Group.
Thomas Swoyer, Jr., Grand Sky Development’s president, says the fence is “symbolic,” in that it will “define the park space and give us the ability to control our own access to it.”
General Atomics has signed a tentative agreement to establish an unmanned aerial systems training academy at the park.
In the summer of 2014, FAA announced the selection of the six public entities that would develop unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) research at test sites around the country. One of these is the North Dakota Department of Commerce, which was issued a Certificate of Waiver or Authorization (COA) to begin using a Draganflyer X4ES small UAS at its Northern Plains Unmanned Aircraft Systems Test Site.
Other drone test-site operators include:
• The University of Alaska, which was issued a COA that authorized flights by an Aeryon Scout small UAS for animal surveys at the university’s Pan-Pacific UAS Test Range Complex in Fairbanks. That authorization encompasses test ranges in Hawaii, Oregon, Kansas, and Tennessee.
• The State of Nevada, which was authorized to test an onsite ScanEagle drone at the Desert Rock Airport located in Mercury, Nev. Desert Rock Airport is a private airport owned and operated by the Department of Energy. The ScanEagle flies at or below 3,000 feet.
• Texas A&M University–Corpus Christi plans to develop safety requirement for UAS vehicles. It is authorized to use an AAAI RS-16 UAS, which weights about 85 pounds and has a wingspan of almost 13 feet.
• Griffiss International Airport is authorized to test at a site in Rome, N.Y. One drone is a PrecisionHawk Lancaster Platform UAS that weighs about three pounds and has a wingspan of four feet. Texas-based HoverStat, which develops technology to use small drones for measuring roofs for solar panel installation, reportedly decided to choose Syracuse as a testing location because the Rome site was nearby.
• Virginia Polytechnic Institute is conducting failure mode testing with a Smart Road Flyer, a low cost, low risk multi-rotor UAS being developed to support research in vehicle and highway systems. Other UAS models being tested include an eSPAARO, Aeryon Sky Ranger, MANTRA2, Sig Rascal, and two AVID EDF-8 micro UASs.
At this site, the Mid-Atlantic Aviation Partnership—a part of Greene’s Institute—has spearheaded drone research. The Virginia Tech site is partnered with the University of Maryland and Rutgers University in New Jersey.
Last month, the Federal Aviation Administration waived the authorization process for the agency’s six nationwide drone test sites that had required clearance before moving forward with research exercises at or below 200 feet.
Related Stories
Giants 400 | Dec 14, 2017
Top 150 BIM design firms
Jacobs, Gensler, and WSP top BD+C’s ranking of the nation’s largest BIM design firms, as reported in the 2017 Giants 300 Report.
BIM and Information Technology | Dec 12, 2017
Reflecting on the future of work
'I believe in the potential for new technology to positively impact the quality of the built environment with immense speed and great efficiency,' writes Proving Ground's Nathan Miller.
Sponsored | BIM and Information Technology | Nov 30, 2017
A million small connections: Designing the new NY bridge
New York’s Tappan Zee Bridge first opened to traffic in 1955.
Sponsored | BIM and Information Technology | Nov 8, 2017
3 ways to protect your firm from cyber threats
While AEC firms may not have the vast quantity of financial information that certain other types of businesses do, the confidential and sensitive information your firm has can be just as damaging to your clients if it gets into the wrong hands.
Augmented Reality | Nov 6, 2017
Three VR + AR innovations to watch
From heat mapping to VR-based meetings, check out this trio of virtual and augmented reality applications for AEC teams.
Sponsored | Building Team | Nov 3, 2017
4 strategies for marketing your AEC firm
Having a clearly defined competitive brand and a fine-tuned marketing approach can give your firm a significant competitive advantage.
BIM and Information Technology | Oct 18, 2017
Project Frog announces Autodesk investment
Autodesk’s investment in Project Frog creates a common data environment, streamlines design and engineering processes, and optimizes architectural design for manufacturing.
BIM and Information Technology | Oct 12, 2017
Laser scanners go handheld
The emergence of handheld 3D laser scanners has been a boon for firms looking to lower costs and speed up turnaround time.
Sponsored | BIM and Information Technology | Oct 10, 2017
Moody Engineering, Inc. utilizes 3D scanner to meet challenges of phosphoric acid tank remodel
By integrating creativity and ingenuity with practicality, the Moody team was able to address the project’s specific requirements in order to save the customer time and money on this challenging project.
AEC Tech | Oct 6, 2017
How professional bias can sabotage industry transformation
Professional bias can take the form of change-resistant thinking that can keep transformational or innovative ambitions at bay. Tech consultant Nate Miller presents three kinds of bias that often emerge when a professional is confronted with new technology.
