flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

In the NIL era, colleges and universities are stepping up their sports facilities game

Sports and Recreational Facilities

In the NIL era, colleges and universities are stepping up their sports facilities game

NIL policies have raised expectations among student-athletes about the quality of sports training and performing facilities, in ways that present new opportunities for AEC firms.


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | October 17, 2024
the renovation of Sam Houston State University’s Mafrige Fieldhouse Locker Room, Photo courtesy PBK
Colleges are upgrading their athletic facilities to meet the rising expectations of student-athletes and to recruit new players. Shown here is the renovation of Sam Houston State University’s Mafrige Fieldhouse Locker Room. Photo courtesy PBK

Since July 1, 2021, student-athletes in most states have had the right to control the use of their names, images, and likenesses (NIL) for marketing and publicity purposes, and be compensated for that usage while maintaining their amateur status to continue playing for their college teams.

This change has led colleges and universities to strike NIL deals with businesses and advertisers, through which individual athletes can negotiate. Booster groups, like alumni associations, have also formed NIL Collectives that raise money from NIL agreements that is made available to students in exchange for using their persona. Sweeter deals can motivate student-athletes to transfer, which complicates teams’ recruiting and roster-building objectives.

NIL policies have raised expectations among student-athletes about the quality of sports training and performing facilities, in ways that present new design, renovation, and construction opportunities for AEC firms with sports practices.

“Schools’ facilities need to be more competitive, and find revenue-generating solutions,” says Sean Plunkett, Managing Principal with PBK Sports, a division of PRK Architects, which has pursued this avenue for higher ed business. He’s seeing more modifications to campus sports venues that create different experiences, such as pay tiers for seating, tailgating, and food and beverage.

On August 22, BD+C interviewed Plunkett and Melvin Robinson, who had recently joined PBK Sports as National Director of Sports Client Engagement. Robinson’s resume includes nearly 15 years with the University of Georgia Athletic Association, with stints as Director of Facilities and Assistant Athletic Director. They had just met with the coaches and staff of a major Big Ten state university, “where football matters,” says Plunkett.

Pictured: Texas A&M University’s remodel of its Davis Center Nutrition Station. Photo courtesy PBK
Pictured: Texas A&M University’s remodel of its Davis Center Nutrition Station. Photo courtesy PBK

Over the past decade, Robinson has watched college sports programs engage in a recruiting arms race, with their athletic facilities as weapons. “It started in the locker room: who has the best pool, the best barber shop? It has all been about flash and pop.” During this period, and especially over the past few years, he’s seen student-athletes evolve into “entrepreneurs,” which can add another layer of stress. College sports programming now includes health, wellness, and financial services to help their athletes handle the pressure.

Student-athletes, he says, have come to expect training facilities to resemble mini versions of ESPN. “You need digital spaces, technology, studios. Hollywood meets higher ed,” Robinson quips. And because college sports, especially football and basketball, are ubiquitous on TV and online platforms, their facilities often define the school’s image for student-athletes and their parents.

“The facilities are a big part of recruiting, enticing, and retaining athletes,” says Robinson.

The cost of new construction or renovation usually isn’t an impediment, says Plunkett, who notes that financing typically comes from ticket sales, donors, and vendors. To help its clients fill gaps in financing, PBK suggests things like seating values, and offering diverse fan experiences both inside and outside the stadium or arena.

Robinson observes that professional sports teams are generally more attentive to the comfort and convenience of their fans, whereas colleges are all about the players. However, pros’ training facilities are catching up. “NIL is leveling the playing field,“ says Robinson.

Related Stories

Sports and Recreational Facilities | Dec 18, 2017

Canada’s newest funicular makes Edmonton’s largest green space more accessible

The incline elevator is located in downtown Edmonton and was publicly funded.

Sports and Recreational Facilities | Dec 15, 2017

Jefferson City’s new 80,000-sf recreation and wellness center

The facility will be co-managed by Lincoln University and the City of Jefferson – Parks, Recreation, and Forestry.

Sports and Recreational Facilities | Dec 6, 2017

An upscale RV camp breaks ground in Coos Bay, Ore.

The complex will include 180 campsites and a year-round clubhouse. 

Sports and Recreational Facilities | Dec 6, 2017

BIG-designed 1.3 million-sf sports and entertainment district includes Austin’s first pro-sports stadium

BIG is working in partnership with STG Design and Austin Sports & Entertainment on the project.

Sports and Recreational Facilities | Nov 27, 2017

The University of Memphis unveils the new home of the men’s basketball program

The Laurie-Walton Family Basketball Center will provide a strong commitment to donor and VIP cultivation.

Sports and Recreational Facilities | Nov 16, 2017

(UPDATED) Sasaki, Snøhetta, Studio T-Square, and HOK will lead the design of the Oakland A’s new stadium

The stadium is being planned for a piece of land that sits next to Lake Merritt near Downtown Oakland, surrounded by parkland and neighborhoods.

Giants 400 | Oct 23, 2017

Wooing jocks and fans

Colleges are going all out to optimize the fan experience and make the most of student athletes’ time.

Sports and Recreational Facilities | Oct 23, 2017

Top 50 sports construction firms

AECOM, Mortenson Construction, and Turner Construction Co. top BD+C’s ranking of the nation’s largest sports sector contractors and construction management firms, as reported in the 2017 Giants 300 Report.

Giants 400 | Oct 20, 2017

Top 20 sports engineering firms

WSP, Walter P Moore, and ME Engineers top BD+C’s ranking of the nation’s largest sports sector engineering and EA firms, as reported in the 2017 Giants 300 Report.

Giants 400 | Oct 20, 2017

Top 40 sports architecture firms

Populous, HOK, and HKS top BD+C’s ranking of the nation’s largest sports sector architecture and AE firms, as reported in the 2017 Giants 300 Report.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021