flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

In the NIL era, colleges and universities are stepping up their sports facilities game

Sports and Recreational Facilities

In the NIL era, colleges and universities are stepping up their sports facilities game

NIL policies have raised expectations among student-athletes about the quality of sports training and performing facilities, in ways that present new opportunities for AEC firms.


By John Caulfield, Senior Editor | October 17, 2024
the renovation of Sam Houston State University’s Mafrige Fieldhouse Locker Room, Photo courtesy PBK
Colleges are upgrading their athletic facilities to meet the rising expectations of student-athletes and to recruit new players. Shown here is the renovation of Sam Houston State University’s Mafrige Fieldhouse Locker Room. Photo courtesy PBK

Since July 1, 2021, student-athletes in most states have had the right to control the use of their names, images, and likenesses (NIL) for marketing and publicity purposes, and be compensated for that usage while maintaining their amateur status to continue playing for their college teams.

This change has led colleges and universities to strike NIL deals with businesses and advertisers, through which individual athletes can negotiate. Booster groups, like alumni associations, have also formed NIL Collectives that raise money from NIL agreements that is made available to students in exchange for using their persona. Sweeter deals can motivate student-athletes to transfer, which complicates teams’ recruiting and roster-building objectives.

NIL policies have raised expectations among student-athletes about the quality of sports training and performing facilities, in ways that present new design, renovation, and construction opportunities for AEC firms with sports practices.

“Schools’ facilities need to be more competitive, and find revenue-generating solutions,” says Sean Plunkett, Managing Principal with PBK Sports, a division of PRK Architects, which has pursued this avenue for higher ed business. He’s seeing more modifications to campus sports venues that create different experiences, such as pay tiers for seating, tailgating, and food and beverage.

On August 22, BD+C interviewed Plunkett and Melvin Robinson, who had recently joined PBK Sports as National Director of Sports Client Engagement. Robinson’s resume includes nearly 15 years with the University of Georgia Athletic Association, with stints as Director of Facilities and Assistant Athletic Director. They had just met with the coaches and staff of a major Big Ten state university, “where football matters,” says Plunkett.

Pictured: Texas A&M University’s remodel of its Davis Center Nutrition Station. Photo courtesy PBK
Pictured: Texas A&M University’s remodel of its Davis Center Nutrition Station. Photo courtesy PBK

Over the past decade, Robinson has watched college sports programs engage in a recruiting arms race, with their athletic facilities as weapons. “It started in the locker room: who has the best pool, the best barber shop? It has all been about flash and pop.” During this period, and especially over the past few years, he’s seen student-athletes evolve into “entrepreneurs,” which can add another layer of stress. College sports programming now includes health, wellness, and financial services to help their athletes handle the pressure.

Student-athletes, he says, have come to expect training facilities to resemble mini versions of ESPN. “You need digital spaces, technology, studios. Hollywood meets higher ed,” Robinson quips. And because college sports, especially football and basketball, are ubiquitous on TV and online platforms, their facilities often define the school’s image for student-athletes and their parents.

“The facilities are a big part of recruiting, enticing, and retaining athletes,” says Robinson.

The cost of new construction or renovation usually isn’t an impediment, says Plunkett, who notes that financing typically comes from ticket sales, donors, and vendors. To help its clients fill gaps in financing, PBK suggests things like seating values, and offering diverse fan experiences both inside and outside the stadium or arena.

Robinson observes that professional sports teams are generally more attentive to the comfort and convenience of their fans, whereas colleges are all about the players. However, pros’ training facilities are catching up. “NIL is leveling the playing field,“ says Robinson.

Related Stories

Sports and Recreational Facilities | Sep 1, 2016

U.S. Open stadium’s new retractable roof showcases innovative problem solving in its design and engineering

Mushy ground and indoor condensation were just two of the issues this $150 million project presented to its Building Team. 

Sports and Recreational Facilities | Aug 29, 2016

Reconstruction of Hall of Fame football stadium in Ohio moving forward

The $80 million sports facility is among the features planned for a 90-acre mixed-use village.

Sports and Recreational Facilities | Aug 22, 2016

The Hills of Governors Island reach completion one year ahead of schedule

The man made hills are the latest attraction to open on the island that has been under development since 2006.

| Aug 15, 2016

SPORTS FACILITY GIANTS: New and renovated college sports venues - designed to serve students and the community

Schools are renovating existing structures or building new sports facilities that can serve the student body and surrounding community.

| Aug 15, 2016

Top 30 Sports Facility Engineering Firms

AECOM, Thornton Tomasetti, and ME Engineers top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest sports facility sector engineering and E/A firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.

| Aug 15, 2016

Top 60 Sports Facility Construction Firms

Mortenson Construction, AECOM, and Turner Construction Co. top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest sports facility sector construction and construction management firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.

| Aug 15, 2016

Top 50 Sports Facility Architecture Firms

Populous, HKS, and HOK top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest sports facility sector architecture and A/E firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.

High-rise Construction | Aug 1, 2016

Rising to the occasion: Dubai shows some pictures of proposed 500-step structure

Still in the planning stages, this building would serve tourists and power climbers alike. 

Sports and Recreational Facilities | Jul 31, 2016

Shanghai’s latest tourist attraction: an outside, rail-less walkway around one of its tallest skyscrapers

For less than $60, you can now get a bird’s-eye (or window-washer’s) view of the cityscape.

Sports and Recreational Facilities | Jul 20, 2016

San Diego’s waterfront redevelopment would go beyond a mere ‘project’

Its developers envision a thriving business, education, and entertainment district, highlighted by a huge observation tower and aquarium.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021