flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Mar 23, 2021

The 15-minute city may not work in much of North America

Segregated neighborhoods and car-centric cities may not adapt to the European model.

Codes and Standards | Mar 22, 2021

Think tank offers plan for new approach to reduce neighborhood poverty

Strategy uses more targeted approach to invest in low-income areas.

Codes and Standards | Mar 19, 2021

California city bans construction of new gas stations

Existing stations will not be allowed to add more pumps.

Codes and Standards | Mar 18, 2021

Congressmen ask Biden to tackle rising lumber costs

Rising materials costs and supply shortages threaten economic recovery, housing starts.

Codes and Standards | Mar 16, 2021

Massachusetts bill would mandate rooftop solar on new homes, commercial buildings

Proposed Bay State mandate modeled on California’s.

Codes and Standards | Mar 15, 2021

Nevada may create areas for tech companies to form own governments

Legislation calls for ‘Innovation Zones’ that could become smart cities.

Codes and Standards | Mar 11, 2021

Los Angeles commits to carbon-free city buildings

City will take into account embedded carbon when contracting to buy construction products.

Codes and Standards | Mar 10, 2021

‘Smart retrofitting’ will be crucial to net zero aspirations

AI, analytical software, Internet of Things are keys to decarbonization of built environment.

Codes and Standards | Mar 9, 2021

Salt Lake City is first jurisdiction to adopt new standards for off-site construction

Code Council and Modular Building Institute developing standards and compliance protocols.

Codes and Standards | Mar 8, 2021

Hyperlocal zoning could spur more affordable housing construction

Letting blocks and streets pass their own rules could have impact.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021