While the Bird's Nest and Water Cube captured all the TV coverage during the Beijing Olympics in August, the Rem Koolhaas-designed CCTV Headquarters in Beijing—known as the “Drunken Towers” or “Big Shorts,” for its unusual shape—is certain to steal the show when it opens next year.
The Dutch architect's scheme for the $730 million, 4.8-million-sf building, which will serve as the new headquarters for China's state-run television network, essentially folds and twists the traditional skyscraper form into a parallelogram-like shape.
The result is a single loop composed of four horizontal and two vertical sections that connects CCTV's news, broadcasting, administration, and program production departments. Koolhaas's goal is to create an environment that forces everyone in the television business—creative types, producers, technicians, and administrators—to interact in hopes of producing better programming more efficiently and economically.
The novel design, with its large, nine-story base, also provides multiple social “touch points” with the public to encourage passersby to engage with the building, according to Ole Scheeren, Office for Metropolitan Architecture's partner-in-charge on the project.
Because OMA's unusual geometric scheme does not meet Chinese building code, the project structural engineering team, led by London-based Arup with the East China Architecture and Design Institute (ECADI) as local design institute of record, had to employ a performance-based design approach. As part of this process, engineers had to convince a panel of experts that the structure would not only withstand major seismic and wind events, but also hold up during construction—a significant challenge, given that the sloping vertical towers had to be connected at the top.
“The unprecedented structural design underwent the most rigorous internal and external scrutiny during a two-year span, including an expert panel review by China's Ministry of Construction,” says Rory McGowan, Arup's project director on the CCTV project.
Unlike traditional vertical high-rise construction, where the building's core serves as the primary support, Arup engineers had to utilize the building's external face as the superstructure, creating what is essentially a “continuous tube” composed of a series of steel diagonal braces, or X braces, that work in conjunction with a regular grid of columns and edge beams. This braced tube approach provides ample strength and stiffness in the towers to deliver the loads to the base, and the proper stiffness in the base to reinforce the lower tower levels and deliver loads to the foundation. It also accommodates forces from bending and twisting between the two towers, and provides the leaning towers ample stiffness during construction, allowing them to be safely constructed within tight tolerances before they were connected and propped off each other.
The distribution of the diagonal bracing is not uniform, however. Using 3D modeling software, engineers were able to make the structure as efficient as possible based on load calculations. For instance, the amount of X-bracing was doubled around heavy-loaded zones, such as the “armpits,” and halved around light-loaded zones, including the uppermost portion of the building.
“Varying the bracing density allowed us to fine-tune the structure to ensure it was not too stiff to minimize seismic loads,” says McGowan. The Arup team worked closely with OMA to express this optimized X-bracing pattern in the building's façade.
Internal steel columns extend from the foundation up to the furthest reaches of the building, providing support for the floor plates. Due to the slopping nature of the towers, the vertical columns could not extend continuously from top to bottom. To transfer the load from one series of columns to another, the team designed a system of two-story-deep transfer trusses located three-quarters of the way up the building. A similar approach was employed to support the floor plates in the cantilevered overhang.
Early on, the Building Team considered sloped vertical cores to provide a consistent floor plate layout. But finding a sloped elevator system for a building of this scale was difficult.
“We also learned that having different floor plans actually allowed more flexibility in terms of planning for studios, editing suites, and so on,” says McGowan. Therefore, the final scheme steps straight vertical cores so that they always sit within the footprint of the sloping towers.
The main towers sit on a hybrid piled raft foundation system that shares the total load coming from the superstructures between a 7½-meter-thick concrete platform, or “raft,” and a series of 1.2-meter-diameter piles that extend 52 meters into the soil. The foundation system is arranged so that the center of the raft is close to the center of load at the bottom of each tower, and no permanent tension is allowed in the piles. Limited tension in certain piles is permitted during a major seismic event.
For the nine-story base and three-story basement, a traditional raft foundation is used, with tension piles between column locations to resist uplift from water pressure acting on the deep basement. Fifteen- to 20-meter-long tension piles are arranged under the raft with additional piles under secondary cores and columns supporting large transfer trusses from the studio areas.
Related Stories
AEC Tech | Feb 13, 2020
Exclusive research: Download the final report for BD+C's Giants 300 Technology and Innovation Study
This survey of 130 of the nation's largest architecture, engineering, and construction firms tracks the state of AEC technology adoption and innovation initiatives at the AEC Giants.
Sponsored | HVAC | Feb 3, 2020
Reliable Building Systems Increase Net Operating Income by Retaining Tenants
Tenants increasingly expect a well-crafted property that feels unique, authentic, and comfortable—with technologically advanced systems and spaces that optimize performance and encourage collaboration and engagement. The following guidance will help owners and property managers keep tenants happy.
Building Technology | Jan 31, 2020
The bidding war for Thyssenkrupp’s elevator technology business just got hotter
Engineering firm Kone Oyj raises the ante and joins three other suitor groups that have made multibillion dollar offers.
AEC Tech | Jan 16, 2020
EC firms with a clear ‘digital roadmap’ should excel in 2020
Deloitte, in new report, lays out a risk mitigation strategy that relies on tech.
Building Technology | Jan 7, 2020
Tariff whiplash for bifacial solar modules
Bifacial solar systems offer many advantages over traditional systems.
Sponsored | HVAC | Jan 6, 2020
Four Ways Building Systems Create Long-term Profitability
When accounting for the total cost of ownership and the potential return on investment, owners and developers should consider total energy usage, the lifespan of building systems equipment, the recruitment and retention of occupants, and lease rates.
Sponsored | HVAC | Jan 6, 2020
Maximize Energy Efficiency in Class A Office Buildings With Modern Building Systems
Energy-efficient building design starts with the building envelope, but the building systems have a tremendous impact on energy use as well.
| Dec 18, 2019
Reconsidering construction robotics
After decades when experts predicted that robots would become more prevalent on construction sites, it would appear that the industry has finally reached that point where necessity, aspiration, and investment are colliding.
75 Top Building Products | Dec 16, 2019
Top Building Systems Products for 2019
FabricAir’s ceiling-hung fabric duct and Ellumi Lighting’s bacteria-killing lights are among the 13 new building systems products to make Building Design+Construction's 2019 101 Top Products report.
Building Technology | Nov 15, 2019
Tools for measuring embedded carbon in building materials are on their launching pads
The Carbon Leadership Forum and Thornton Tomasetti are taking the lead to drive the industry toward zero-carbon buildings by 2050.