While the Bird's Nest and Water Cube captured all the TV coverage during the Beijing Olympics in August, the Rem Koolhaas-designed CCTV Headquarters in Beijing—known as the “Drunken Towers” or “Big Shorts,” for its unusual shape—is certain to steal the show when it opens next year.
The Dutch architect's scheme for the $730 million, 4.8-million-sf building, which will serve as the new headquarters for China's state-run television network, essentially folds and twists the traditional skyscraper form into a parallelogram-like shape.
The result is a single loop composed of four horizontal and two vertical sections that connects CCTV's news, broadcasting, administration, and program production departments. Koolhaas's goal is to create an environment that forces everyone in the television business—creative types, producers, technicians, and administrators—to interact in hopes of producing better programming more efficiently and economically.
The novel design, with its large, nine-story base, also provides multiple social “touch points” with the public to encourage passersby to engage with the building, according to Ole Scheeren, Office for Metropolitan Architecture's partner-in-charge on the project.
Because OMA's unusual geometric scheme does not meet Chinese building code, the project structural engineering team, led by London-based Arup with the East China Architecture and Design Institute (ECADI) as local design institute of record, had to employ a performance-based design approach. As part of this process, engineers had to convince a panel of experts that the structure would not only withstand major seismic and wind events, but also hold up during construction—a significant challenge, given that the sloping vertical towers had to be connected at the top.
“The unprecedented structural design underwent the most rigorous internal and external scrutiny during a two-year span, including an expert panel review by China's Ministry of Construction,” says Rory McGowan, Arup's project director on the CCTV project.
Unlike traditional vertical high-rise construction, where the building's core serves as the primary support, Arup engineers had to utilize the building's external face as the superstructure, creating what is essentially a “continuous tube” composed of a series of steel diagonal braces, or X braces, that work in conjunction with a regular grid of columns and edge beams. This braced tube approach provides ample strength and stiffness in the towers to deliver the loads to the base, and the proper stiffness in the base to reinforce the lower tower levels and deliver loads to the foundation. It also accommodates forces from bending and twisting between the two towers, and provides the leaning towers ample stiffness during construction, allowing them to be safely constructed within tight tolerances before they were connected and propped off each other.
The distribution of the diagonal bracing is not uniform, however. Using 3D modeling software, engineers were able to make the structure as efficient as possible based on load calculations. For instance, the amount of X-bracing was doubled around heavy-loaded zones, such as the “armpits,” and halved around light-loaded zones, including the uppermost portion of the building.
“Varying the bracing density allowed us to fine-tune the structure to ensure it was not too stiff to minimize seismic loads,” says McGowan. The Arup team worked closely with OMA to express this optimized X-bracing pattern in the building's façade.
Internal steel columns extend from the foundation up to the furthest reaches of the building, providing support for the floor plates. Due to the slopping nature of the towers, the vertical columns could not extend continuously from top to bottom. To transfer the load from one series of columns to another, the team designed a system of two-story-deep transfer trusses located three-quarters of the way up the building. A similar approach was employed to support the floor plates in the cantilevered overhang.
Early on, the Building Team considered sloped vertical cores to provide a consistent floor plate layout. But finding a sloped elevator system for a building of this scale was difficult.
“We also learned that having different floor plans actually allowed more flexibility in terms of planning for studios, editing suites, and so on,” says McGowan. Therefore, the final scheme steps straight vertical cores so that they always sit within the footprint of the sloping towers.
The main towers sit on a hybrid piled raft foundation system that shares the total load coming from the superstructures between a 7½-meter-thick concrete platform, or “raft,” and a series of 1.2-meter-diameter piles that extend 52 meters into the soil. The foundation system is arranged so that the center of the raft is close to the center of load at the bottom of each tower, and no permanent tension is allowed in the piles. Limited tension in certain piles is permitted during a major seismic event.
For the nine-story base and three-story basement, a traditional raft foundation is used, with tension piles between column locations to resist uplift from water pressure acting on the deep basement. Fifteen- to 20-meter-long tension piles are arranged under the raft with additional piles under secondary cores and columns supporting large transfer trusses from the studio areas.
Related Stories
Augmented Reality | May 30, 2018
HoloLens used as wayfinding device to guide blind people through complex buildings
Neither training nor modification of the physical environment are required to use the system.
Architects | May 14, 2018
4 tactics for our digital transformation
While our technology is becoming more advanced, the fundamental processes at the core of design and construction businesses have largely remained unchanged for decades.
Virtual Reality | May 8, 2018
‘Bespoke’ VR apps give Woods Bagot an edge in presenting design ideas
The architectural firm is finding that some clients respond quicker to proposals as a result.
Architects | Apr 16, 2018
Is the AEC industry ready to shake off its retrograde image?
Technology has been and always will be perceived as a source for wonder and worry.
Building Technology | Apr 10, 2018
A jobsite dashboard is helping Clark Construction take the drudgery out of managing punch lists
Turnover Vision is the latest example of Clark digitizing its construction management process.
Contractors | Apr 9, 2018
Tech Report 5.0: Smart(er) Jobsites
Real-time construction analysis, just-in-time materials delivery, digital production planning systems—these are just a few of the novel approaches construction firms are implementing to take control of their jobsites.
Building Technology | Apr 9, 2018
Autodesk opens its Forge platform, encouraging more suppliers to build onto it
The goal is to further streamline the construction process, from design to commissioning.
Architects | Apr 5, 2018
Tech Report 5.0: The Human Touch
Can studying humans at a behavioral level produce better buildings? Cognitive architecture experts are working to find out.
Building Technology | Apr 4, 2018
Tech Report 5.0: Digital Immersion
Indoor digital media changes the identities of buildings by stimulating occupant interaction.
Building Technology | Apr 3, 2018
Tech Report 5.0: AI Arrives
From construction scheduling to risk management, AEC firms see promise in budding artificial intelligence platforms geared for commercial building projects.