Demand for flexibility in the built environment has never been more essential. Traditional single-use buildings have evolved into more dynamic environments, pushing interdisciplinary research organizations to adapt. As capital streams shift and traditional returns on investment are pressed, programmatic innovation and collaboration have become a focus for investment.
Cohabitation of life sciences, educational research, and healthcare users has disrupted the typical real estate model. Partnerships are blossoming around scientific research and development. Funding priorities and talent development have led to strategic partnerships for both dedicated facilities and ongoing operational collaboration.
These merging markets are yielding programmatic shifts in ideology and enabling more robust facility development. However, interdisciplinary projects require both depth of expertise in traditional markets and forward-thinking ideology to support research collision and advancement. As interdisciplinary organizations strive to not only seek to attract the best faculty and researchers, but also to develop facilities that can stand the test of time.
The lessons of a few projects can serve as guideposts for institutions planning similar interdisciplinary facilities. Specifically, project owners should consider:
- the value of more collaborative building methods
- close collaboration with end users
- the benefits of partners who can leverage sector-specific knowledge to their advantage.
Let’s look at several examples.
UCSF WEILL NEUROSCIENCES BUILDING: CO-LOCATING MULTIPLE DISCIPLINES IN NEW WAYS
The 282,000-sf UCSF Joan and Sanford I. Weill Neurosciences Building on the University of California San Francisco’s Mission Bay Campus is a collaboration of neurology, psychiatry, neurological surgery and clinical spaces that historically would not be co-located. Top neuroscientists from those disciplines collaborate in one space in the hopes of advancing research and solving problems relating to disorders like dementia, Alzheimer’s, and Huntington’s disease. Working together allows interdisciplinary research that intentionally seeks diversity in discipline expertise in the pursuit of breakthrough discoveries.
The design and construction of interdisciplinary facilities must allow for dynamic exchange, requiring more thoughtful team composition and collaboration. As a result, the contractor, designer, and other key partners co-located their teams to allow for quick collaboration, similar to design-build or integrated project delivery.
Such buildings are complex, as they must mirror near-term demands but also enable long-term flexibility as research evolves. For that reason, three floors of UCSF’s six-story building are made up of clinical and patient treatment space requiring a particular attention to detail as it relates to healthcare and support for the patient experience model. The research spaces above have their own unique laboratory and research demands.
This intersection of higher education and healthcare created unique demands for building performance and required the expertise of a builder familiar with each respective market and the ability to be nimble with other project partners. Institutions should consider more collaborative team setups to gain value throughout the project.
ASU HEALTH FUTURES CENTER: A NEW MODEL FOR HEALTHCARE EDUCATION AND DELIVERY
Such a partnership between healthcare systems and higher education is evidenced by the Arizona State University Health Futures Center, in Phoenix. This innovative medical learning facility, a collaboration between ASU and the Mayo Clinic, represents a new model for healthcare education and delivery in the U.S.
Designed by CO Architects and DFDG Architects, the 150,000-sf ground-up facility was built with the goal of creating collaborative spaces that facilitate future-focused education and training. ASU nursing students learn to treat patients through hands-on training in clinical skills labs with simulation exam and operating rooms. There is also a home care lab with a mock apartment where students learn to assist patients in their homes, with a pathway connecting the Health Futures Center to the adjacent healthcare campus.
Research components include a med-tech innovation accelerator, as well as biomedical engineering and informatics research labs. The facility allows various ASU programs to study and work together, including the College of Health Solutions, College of Nursing and Health Innovation, and the Fulton Schools of Engineering, and Entrepreneurship and Innovation. Collaboration programs within the Mayo Clinic also allow for interdisciplinary research and exchange.
Achieving all stakeholder expectations requires a deep understanding of the needs of the various end users in the facility. That knowledge, especially when applied early in the design process, can yield insight that affects both design and construction.
For example, DPR’s precon team developed a predictive cost-analysis tool that enabled the construction and design teams to accurately identify where the budget was being allocated based on programming. This unique and interactive tool helps the team incorporate critical end-user design and facility function needs while keeping the project on budget.
USC MICHELSON CENTER FOR CONVERGENT BIOSCIENCE: MERGING LIFE SCIENCES AND HIGHER EDUCATION
The collaboration between traditional life sciences and higher education is exemplified by the University of Southern California’s Michelson Center for Convergent Bioscience, Los Angeles.
Designed by HOK Architects, the 190,000 sf research facility houses 30 labs, Class 100 and 1000 nanotechnology clean rooms, imaging suites, conference rooms, and classroom space. Hundreds of researchers and students employed in the flexible, open, shared labs collaborate in the fields of biological science, imaging, engineering, nanofabrication and cross-disciplinary studies.
Cross-disciplinary research, education, and capital investment are complicated by varying needs and goals that complicate alignment and adjacency strategies. Design and construction for these atypical facilities requires an acute understanding of higher education, healthcare, and life science environments. While adjacency drives research collision, it complicates systematic design and construction. Program transparency and well-articulated needs are required to translate into collaboratively built environments. An acute understanding of each individual modality is imperative to yield cumulative results.
Successful delivery teams are comprised of experts in each respective field engaged early in the process to identify, organize, and execute the project. These teams can help in planning stages due to their familiarity with sector-specific supply chains. As colleges and universities closely watch every dollar, knowledge such as this can make a significant difference.
FAU STILES-NICHOLSON BRAIN INSTITUTE: NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH AND EDUCATION IN THE COMMUNITY
Another example of a cross-disciplinary facility recently opened in Jupiter, Fla. Designed by PGAL, the FAU Stiles-Nicholson Brain Institute is a 58,000-sf facility that brings together neuroscience research, education, and community engagement for the study of brain and behavioral disorders.
Designed to be a collaborative hub of study and research for scientists and students in the field of neuroscience, the interdisciplinary nature of the facility will foster collaboration and connect those in the field.
Florida Atlantic University's Stiles-Nicholson Brain Institute brings together neuroscience research, education, and community engagement for the study of brain and behavioral disorders.
The center aims to leverage recent advancements in data science and advanced optical technologies to develop approaches to study brain disorders such as Alzheimer’s disease, autism, addiction, and brain cancer, with the goal of discovering new therapies and treatments. The core laboratory will provide educational experiences for undergraduate students, graduate students, and postdoctoral fellows. There are also spaces for lectures and community events.
The addition of the Stiles-Nicholson Brain Institute expands the life science research cluster that includes the Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience and the Herbert Wertheim UF Scripps Institute for Biomedical Innovation & Technology. Forward-thinking endeavors are creating market momentum in the public and private sectors to infuse capital, research, and innovation in the hope of scientific breakthroughs. Just as collaboration will take place inside, the successful delivery of the facility also relied on collaboration.
THE GOAL: NEW DISCOVERIES, NEW THERAPIES, NEW DRUG TREATMENTS
The prospects offered in today’s rapidly evolving and expanding interdisciplinary research and development ecosystem are certain to result in new discoveries. The rewards to the early adopting and forward-thinking institutions and industries pursuing collaborative design and construction methods for interdisciplinary research facilities are becoming evident almost daily.
New discoveries, product patents, therapies, and drug treatments are being produced at exponential rates, and the future for additional positive change in this ecosystem is both exciting and promising.
ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Steven Will, Director of Development, leads the market strategy for DPR Construction, focusing on operational and strategic engagement spanning DPR’s core markets. He holds a master’s in construction management from the University of Florida.
PROJECT TEAMS
UCSF Joan and Sanford I. Weill Neurosciences Building
University of California San Francisco (owner), SmithGroup and Mark Cavagnero Associates (architects), Degenkolb Engineers (SE), Jacobs (CM), and DPR Construction (GC)
Arizona State Health Futures Center
Arizona Board of Regents/Arizona State University (owner), DFDG Architects (executive architect), CO Architects (interior designer), Advanced Structural Engineering (SE), Wood, Patel & Associates (CE), Affiliated Engineers (MEP/FP, lighting designer), Jeremiah Associates (acoustical, AV/IT systems consultant), Floor Associates (landscape architect), and DPR Construction (GC)
University of Southern California’s Michelson Center for Convergent Bioscience
University of Southern California (owner), HOK (designer), John A. Martin & Associates (SE), ACCO Engineered Systems (mechanical engineer), Vanderweil Engineers (MEP), CSI Electrical Contractors and DAART Engineering Company (electrical engineers), AGI (laboratory planner), and DPR Construction (GC)
FAU Stiles-Nicholson Brain Institute
Florida Atlantic University (owner), PGAL (designer), Johnson Structural Group (SE), Kimley-Horn & Associates (CE), Bard Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers (MEP), and DPR Construction (GC)
Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience
Max Planck Institute (owner), ZGF Architects (designer), PGAL (associate architect), Bard Rao + Athanas Consulting Engineers (MEP), Research Facilities Design (laboratory designer), and DPR Construction (GC)
Related Stories
University Buildings | Aug 16, 2016
New images of Rice University’s Moody Center for the Arts revealed by Michael Maltzan Architecture
The arts center will foster creativity for making and presenting works across all disciplines
| Aug 10, 2016
UNIVERSITY GIANTS: Facing money woes, the nation's colleges double down on innovative ideas
Budget constraints are compelling some public institutions to pursue alternative methods of financing their major building projects.
| Aug 9, 2016
Top 70 University Engineering Firms
AECOM, WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff, and Jacobs top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest university sector engineering and E/A firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 9, 2016
Top 100 University Construction Firms
Turner Construction Co., The Whiting-Turner Contracting Co, and Skanska USA top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest university sector construction and construction management firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
| Aug 9, 2016
Top 100 University Architecture Firms
Gensler, Perkins+Will, and CannonDesign top Building Design+Construction’s annual ranking of the nation’s largest university sector architecture and A/E firms, as reported in the 2016 Giants 300 Report.
University Buildings | Aug 5, 2016
How to design the best dining facilities for Millennial students
Location, visibility, and adaptability are three important ideas to keep in mind when designing campus dining spaces, writes Gresham Smith and Partners’ Patrick Gilbert.
University Buildings | Jul 22, 2016
Fast-growing UC Merced will double in size by 2020
The state’s Board of Regents has approved a $1.34 billion plan that would add nearly 1.2 million sf of new space.
University Buildings | Jul 6, 2016
University housing of the future will blend life and study
Universities across the country are striving to meet the demand of on-campus housing. VOA's Steve Siegle examines what students and universities desire in campus living, and how designers can respond.
University Buildings | Jun 13, 2016
Renovated Drexel University academic building will welcome students with front porch
A large screen sets a living room vibe for the Philadelphia academic building. Plans call for 9,000 sf of common space on the inside and a new quad on the outside.
University Buildings | Jun 13, 2016
Universities infuse tech features into learning, living, and shopping spaces
Virtual learning rooms, gaming stations, and self-check-out kiosks are among the perks—and necessities—that have all become commonplace in college campus design.
