flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Are public-private partnerships the new normal?

Are public-private partnerships the new normal?


Gresham Smith | October 29, 2013
Left to right: Meriwether Lewis and William Clark were private explorers commissioned by President Thomas Jefferson to figure out what exactly the U.S. had acquired with the Louisiana Purchase; A public-private partnership made it possible for the Transcontinental Railroad-nearly 2,000 miles long- to be completed in six years, spurring incredible development and growth; The Internet was invented in a government lab but developed and commercialized in the private sector.

The Lewis and Clark expedition. The Transcontinental Railroad. The invention of the Internet. These are some of our country’s proudest projects, and they have one critical factor in common: they were the result of a public-private partnership.

A P3 agreement between a public entity and a private company transfers the design, construction, operation and maintenance of a public facility to the private sector, either for a new project or for improvements to existing facilities. These agreements have been used to finance, construct and operate a variety of building and infrastructure projects, including highways, ports, sewer systems, water treatment facilities, hospitals, schools, and even hotels and residential developments.

With this history of successful innovation, P3 agreements are arguably the most effective mechanism for accomplishing key projects, especially in our current economic and political climate. Government funds are perpetually low, politicians are well-aware that raising taxes could mean electoral suicide, bond referendums are not passing, and because of this, many beneficial public projects are not getting off the ground. Additionally, trust in government, according to recent polls, has reached all-time lows, and taxpayers are increasingly scrutinizing government spending and demanding results as the economy slowly clambers out of recession.

The P3 structure can overcome these obstacles by providing an influx of private sector dollars to jumpstart projects, and by instituting a system of checks and balances that combines the private sector's focus on the bottom line with the public sector's focus on voters’ needs and wants. The payoff for the public at large is considerable, as projects complete with fewer delays and fewer tax hikes, and public and private entities alike are held more accountable. 

For public and private organizations, P3 agreements offer mutual benefits. Government organizations can receive project funding while also transferring risks to the private sector. Private contractors benefit from the increased work and also from the goodwill and open communication fostered between the two groups. Such collaboration can be particularly helpful in dealing with the intricacies of zoning and code compliance, which often stall or even halt private sector projects. It can also be helpful for achieving the increasingly multi-faceted, complex development projects that are becoming the norm. In urban downtowns, for example, P3 agreements can help to revitalize areas of blight and decay, foster more sustainable development and fulfill a growing need for community redevelopment.

Read the full post at the GS&P Dialogue blog site. 

 


About the author: Steve Kulinski is executive vice president of GS&P’s Corporate and Urban Design and Land Planning markets. Steve has more than 37 years of design experience, specializing in strategic planning, facility assessment, programming and interior master planning. He is active in the corporate real estate industry and was the founding president of the Tennessee chapter of CoreNet Global, as well as the recipient of their Senior Leader of Corporate Real Estate award. More on Kulinski.

More from Author

Gresham Smith | Oct 16, 2024

How AI can augment the design visualization process

Blog author Tim Beecken, AIA, uses the design of an airport as a case-study for AI’s potential in design visualizations.

Gresham Smith | Aug 17, 2023

How to design for adaptive reuse: Don’t reinvent the wheel

Gresham Smith demonstrates the opportunities of adaptive reuse, specifically reusing empty big-box retail and malls, many of which sit unused or underutilized across the country.

Gresham Smith | May 24, 2023

Designing spaces that promote enrollment

Alyson Mandeville, Higher Education Practice Leader, argues that colleges and universities need to shift their business model—with the help of designers.

Gresham Smith | Apr 24, 2023

Smart savings: Commissioning for the hybrid workplace

Joe Crowe, Senior Mechanical Engineer, Gresham Smith, shares smart savings tips for facility managers and building owners of hybrid workplaces.

Gresham Smith | Mar 20, 2023

3 ways prefabrication doubles as a sustainability strategy

Corie Baker, AIA, shares three modular Gresham Smith projects that found sustainability benefits from the use of prefabrication.

Gresham Smith | Jan 19, 2023

Maximizing access for everyone: A closer look at universal design in healthcare facilities

Maria Sanchez, Interior Designer at Gresham Smith, shares how universal design bolsters empathy and equity in healthcare facilities.

Gresham Smith | Dec 20, 2022

Designing for a first-in-the-world proton therapy cancer treatment system

Gresham Smith begins designing four proton therapy vaults for a Flint, Mich., medical center.

Gresham Smith | Nov 21, 2022

An inside look at the airport industry's plan to develop a digital twin guidebook

Zoë Fisher, AIA explores how design strategies are changing the way we deliver and design projects in the post-pandemic world.

Gresham Smith | Feb 13, 2022

Helping maximize project dollars: Utility coordination 101

In this post, I take a look at the utility coordination services our Transportation group offers to our clients in an attempt to minimize delays and avoid unforeseen costs.

Gresham Smith | May 7, 2021

Private practice: Designing healthcare spaces that promote patient privacy

If a facility violates HIPAA rules, the penalty can be costly to both their reputation and wallet, with fines up to $250,000 depending on the severity.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021