The annual Giants 300 Report ranks the top AEC firms in commercial construction, by revenue. You’ll want to be sure your firm is on the Giants 300 list, as potential clients look to these rankings for prospective firms to design and construct their future projects.

Giants 300 results will be published in our July 2014 issue.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE 2014 GIANTS 300 SURVEY

NOTE: The Excel document has multiple tabs. If you do not see the tabs at the bottom of the worksheet, go to the “view” tab on the menu and select “full screen." You should see six tabs at the bottom.

Completed surveys must be returned by Wednesday, May 21, 2014.

Please fill out the survey form and attach it in an email to BOTH dbarista@sgcmail.com and bdcGiants2014@sgcmail.com.

There are two additional ways to participate in the July Giants 300 report:

1. SUBMIT YOUR LATEST PROJECT PHOTOS FOR CONSIDERATION
As in years past, we're looking for great project photos for use in the July Giants issue, including on the cover. Please email your photo submissions to me (dbarista@sgcmail.com) by May 21. If possible, please include a short description of each image, with the project name and location and key Building Team members (owner/client, architect, structural engineer, MEP engineer, and contractor)

2. SUBMIT YOUR IDEAS FOR THE JULY GIANTS ISSUE EDITORIAL COVERAGE
The editors would like to hear from your AEC teams on the latest trends, projects, and innovations across a number of major building sectors that will be covered in the July Giants issue. They include: healthcare, K-12 schools, higher education, data centers, multifamily, government, reconstruction, office, hospitality/hotels, green, BIM/VDC, military, and science and technology. Please email a short summary (and photos, if applicable) of your trends/innovations/projects for any of these sectors to dbarista@sgcmail.com by May 7.

Questions? Contact David Barista, Editor-in-Chief, at dbarista@sgcmail.com or 847-954-7929.

Download

A terminal modernization program can be a complicated and expensive task that airport operators may be hesitant to undertake unless necessitated by demands for increased capacity. This is the first post in our series examining why airport operators should bother to upgrade their facilities, even if capacity isn’t forcing the issue.