flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

How does your hospital stack up? Grumman/Butkus Associates 2016 Hospital Benchmarking Survey

Market Data

How does your hospital stack up? Grumman/Butkus Associates 2016 Hospital Benchmarking Survey

Report examines electricity, fossil fuel, water/sewer, and carbon footprint.


By Grumman/Butkus Associates | February 16, 2017

Hospitals’ energy costs per square foot (red boxes) have fluctuated greatly since 1999. Energy use intensity (Btu/sf/year) and energy costs (ft2/year) fell slightly in 2015. Chart ©2016 Grumman/Butkus Associates.

Grumman/Butkus Associates, a firm of energy efficiency consultants and sustainable design engineers, recently released the results of its 2016 Hospital Energy and Water Benchmarking Survey, focusing on healthcare facilities’ resource usage trends and costs for calendar year 2015.

Since G/BA initiated the survey more than 20 years ago, hospitals’ overall fossil fuel use has trended downward, but electricity use isn’t declining as much. The average combined Btu/ft2 (electricity plus gas/steam) for participating facilities was 237,998 in CY2015, slightly down from 239,591 in CY2014.

Square-foot prices for gas/steam were down significantly year-to-year ($0.82 in 2015, compared with $1.02 in 2014), but square-foot prices for electricity rose ($2.28 in 2015, vs. $2.16 in 2014). The overall result is that hospitals’ total ft2 costs for energy (gas/steam plus electric) declined: $3.11 for 2015, compared with $3.18 for 2014.

Hospitals’ average carbon footprint has remained fairly steady at about 60 pounds of CO2 equivalent per ft2 per year since G/BA began calculating carbon data in 1999. “If we are going to address the very daunting issue of climate change, the healthcare industry must make greater strides in reducing its carbon footprint,” says Dan Doyle, G/BA Chairman. “As the trend data shows, not enough progress is being made so far.”

Participating facilities displayed a broad range of usage patterns. For instance, some participants are using more than 200,000 BTU/ft2 in fossil fuel annually, compared with a general mid-range of facilities (about 130,000 BTU/ft2/year) and those that used least (75,000 BTU/ft2/year or less). Similarly, a few hospitals consume more than 40 kWh/ft2/year in electricity, compared with a mid-range of about 25 kWh/ft2/year. A few squeaked by with less than 18 kWh/ft2.

“Facilities that have high unit costs for energy should view this as an opportunity,” says Doyle. “For example, an energy conservation project that would have a five-year payback at an ‘average’ facility may have a payback of just 2.5 or 3 years at a facility with higher unit costs for energy.”

Hospital water/sewer use is also gradually declining, currently averaging about 45 gallons per square foot per year (compared with nearly 70 gallons/ ft2/year a decade ago). Costs for water/sewer are rising, however, now averaging $0.39/ft2. As recently as 2007, hospitals were paying about $0.27/ft2. “G/BA expects the trend of rising water and sewer costs to continue,” says Doyle. “Price hikes not only reflect increasing costs to extract and treat the water, but also the fact that cash-strapped governmental entities may view water as a revenue source.”

Since 1995, the G/BA survey has provided a free annual benchmarking resource. Hospitals are invited to participate by submitting responses to a short list of questions. Information for this edition was provided by 137 hospitals located in Illinois (56), Wisconsin (31), Michigan (29), Indiana (10), and six other states.

Full results and analysis, as well as information about participating in the 2017 survey (2016 data), are available at the firm’s website: grummanbutkus.com/HES. For additional information, contact Dan Doyle (ddoyle@grummanbutkus.com) or Julie Higginbotham (jhigginbotham@grummanbutkus.com).

 

Related Stories

Multifamily Housing | May 10, 2017

May 2017 National Apartment Report

Median one-bedroom rent rose to $1,012  in April, the highest it has been since January.

Senior Living Design | May 9, 2017

Designing for a future of limited mobility

There is an accessibility challenge facing the U.S. An estimated 1 in 5 people will be aged 65 or older by 2040.

Industry Research | May 4, 2017

How your AEC firm can go from the shortlist to winning new business

Here are four key lessons to help you close more business.

Engineers | May 3, 2017

At first buoyed by Trump election, U.S. engineers now less optimistic about markets, new survey shows

The first quarter 2017 (Q1/17) of ACEC’s Engineering Business Index (EBI) dipped slightly (0.5 points) to 66.0.

Market Data | May 2, 2017

Nonresidential Spending loses steam after strong start to year

Spending in the segment totaled $708.6 billion on a seasonally adjusted, annualized basis.

Market Data | May 1, 2017

Nonresidential Fixed Investment surges despite sluggish economic in first quarter

Real gross domestic product (GDP) expanded 0.7 percent on a seasonally adjusted annualized rate during the first three months of the year.

Industry Research | Apr 28, 2017

A/E Industry lacks planning, but still spending large on hiring

The average 200-person A/E Firm is spending $200,000 on hiring, and not budgeting at all.

Market Data | Apr 19, 2017

Architecture Billings Index continues to strengthen

Balanced growth results in billings gains in all regions.

Market Data | Apr 13, 2017

2016’s top 10 states for commercial development

Three new states creep into the top 10 while first and second place remain unchanged.

Market Data | Apr 6, 2017

Architecture marketing: 5 tools to measure success

We’ve identified five architecture marketing tools that will help your firm evaluate if it’s on the track to more leads, higher growth, and broader brand visibility.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021