flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

Codes and Standards

OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. 


By Peter Fabris, Contributing Editor | April 22, 2015
OSHA’s estimated cost of silica rule said to underestimate impact by $4.5 billion annually

The Construction Industry Safety Coalition will cost the industry $5 billion per year. Image: Morgue File/PenMac

A new report by the Construction Industry Safety Coalition (CISC) found that the Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) proposed silica standards for U.S. construction industry will cost the industry $5 billion per year. That’s about $4.5 billion per year more than OSHA’s estimate.

The coalition says that OSHA’s flawed cost estimates point to flaws in the rule, and has urged the federal agency to reconsider its approach. The proposed rule aims to greatly reduce the permissible exposure limit (PEL) of crystalline silica for the construction industry.

The agency pegged the cost to the construction industry at about $511 million a year. “The OSHA analysis included major errors and omissions that account for the large discrepancies with the CISC report,” according to a statement from the industry group.

The CISC report estimates that about 80% of the cost ($3.9 billion/year) will be direct compliance expenditures by the industry such as additional equipment, labor and record-keeping costs.

The remaining 20% will come from increased prices that the industry will have to pay for construction materials and building products such as concrete block, glass, and roofing shingles. OSHA’s estimates failed to take into account these additional costs, CISC says. The added cost would be passed down to customers, the industry group says.

Related Stories

Codes and Standards | Aug 11, 2020

Inefficient air conditioning is a key contributor to global warming

More efficient equipment and buildings could make a big difference.

Codes and Standards | Aug 10, 2020

Concrete Institute and Post-Tensioning Institutes expand partnership

Will collaborate on new structural post-tensioned concrete code requirements.

Codes and Standards | Aug 6, 2020

SpeedCore demonstrates excellent fire resistance without additional fire-protective coatings

New York City approves metal-concrete product for all five boroughs.

Codes and Standards | Aug 5, 2020

Designing, redeveloping communities for zero energy needed to address climate change

District heating and cooling systems boost efficiency.

Codes and Standards | Aug 4, 2020

Virginia is the first state to adopt COVID-19 worker safety rules

Include social distancing requirements, notifications when co-worker tests positive, timelines to return to work after recovery.

Codes and Standards | Aug 3, 2020

Report aids local governments on policy options, pathways to electrify new buildings

Document focuses on switching appliances and equipment away from natural gas, propane.

Codes and Standards | Jul 30, 2020

Institute for Market Transformation acquires Energy-Efficient Codes Coalition

Goal is to achieve net-zero construction by 2050.

Codes and Standards | Jul 29, 2020

Crackdowns grow on construction firms that fail to follow COVID-19 guidelines

States, cities, and OSHA enforce social distancing, hand-washing regulations.

Codes and Standards | Jul 28, 2020

California utility adopts climate emergency declaration

Sacramento-region company commits to working towards carbon neutrality by 2030.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category




halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021