A recent poll of healthcare providers found that 85% agree that most patients will not require an in-person physician evaluation by 2021. Virtual doctor visits will be common, smartphones and wearable sensors will be used widely to record a patient’s health information, and patients will have greater access to self-serving their health needs via technology equipped unmanned kiosks.
These are some of the predictions from the Mortenson Leadership Series Healthcare Study, the construction firm’s fourth in the last six years. The study is based on a poll of more than 900 healthcare professionals, facilities leaders, and architects who support them, conducted during last year’s ASHE Planning, Design, and Construction Summit.
While most of the study’s findings weren’t surprising, they confirm trends about Millennials’ healthcare expectations, how and where healthcare institutions will be investing, the role of technology in healthcare, and what roadblocks might lie ahead for project management.
Millennials' preferences for how they receive healthcare are having a major impact on how health systems are investing. Image: Mortenson
One thing is certain: patients are taking more ownership of their health. Eighty-three percent of the healthcare providers polled observe that patients are far more willing these days to shop for lower-cost care options. By 2021, 85% predict that providers will screen patients first to guide them to the appropriate treatment. And that won’t necessarily be toward a medical office or clinic.
One of the biggest disparities between the 2018 and 2015 surveys was the responses to the question about how common virtual doctors would be in three years’ time. Last year, 88% responded to this question affirmatively, compared to 63% in 2015. And 85% in the 2018 surveyed participants thought that most patients don’t require an in-person physician evaluation, versus 49% in 2015.
As one 2018 respondent noted, “Millennials expect immediate access. This access will drive how we design facilities as well as garner a new age of telehealth.” Two-fifths of healthcare providers and architects mentioned that virtual telemedicine and self-service treatments would be typical delivery care within the next decade, with much less reliance on physical structures to deliver goods and services.
Healthcare facilities managers say their institutions must become leaner to grapple with insufficient project resources. Many see opportunities in reducing waste and energy consumption. Image: Mortenson
More than two-fifths (44%) of architects polled also said that Millennials’ expectations about the need for more integration and utilization of technology is impacting healthcare and its facilities, followed by 22% who cited the demand for convenience and virtual care. “Less acute, more ambulatory. Less invasive procedures. More virtual … diagnosis and treatments,” stated one respondent.
Two thirds of facilities leaders polled said that their institutions would invest more over the next two to three years. But 35% added that their biggest challenge continues to be insufficient money and resources (including receiving adequate payments for services rendered), followed by “growing pains” (18%) and project delivery (17%).
Nearly half of facilities leaders polled say their healthcare systems continue to invest in clinics, ambulatory care centers, and medical offices. Image: Mortenson
Nearly all of the facilities leaders see significant opportunities to eliminate waste and reduce energy use.
Despite all of speculation about virtual care expressed in the study, 49% of facilities leaders said their institutions would be making major investments in clinics, ambulatory care, and MOBs, followed by traditional hospitals and focused medical facilities (48% each), microhospitals (47%), and remote screening facilities (45%).
The respondents were evenly split about how much their institutions might spend over the next two years, with 33% each projecting moderate, substantial, or flat growth.
The study includes a section about the Affordable Care Act. Fewer respondents in 2018 than in 2015 thought the legislation had done enough to address the country’s long-term healthcare needs. And between 94% and 97% of those polled last year said that the Act still needed “significant changes or revisions,” had created uncertainty for their institutions, and had challenged their organization’s near-term financial condition.
Related Stories
Giants 400 | Oct 6, 2022
Top 50 Medical Office Building Engineering + EA Firms for 2022
Jacobs, Gresham Smith, KPFF Consulting Engineers, and IMEG Corp. head the ranking of the nation's largest medical office building (MOB) engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2022, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Oct 6, 2022
Top 100 Medical Office Building Architecture + AE Firms for 2022
CannonDesign, Perkins Eastman, HGA, and E4H Environments for Health Architecture top the ranking of the nation's largest medical office building (MOB) architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2022, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Oct 6, 2022
Top 60 Outpatient Facility Contractors + CM Firms for 2022
Whiting-Turner Contracting Co., PCL Construction, Skanska USA, and Power Construction top the ranking of the nation's largest outpatient facility contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2022, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Oct 6, 2022
Top 40 Outpatient Facility Engineering + EA Firms for 2022
Jacobs, IMEG Corp., Gresham Smith, and TLC Engineering Solutions head the ranking of the nation's largest outpatient facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2022, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Oct 6, 2022
Top 100 Outpatient Facility Architecture + AE Firms for 2022
Perkins and Will, HDR, CannonDesign, and Massa Multimedia Architecture top the ranking of the nation's largest outpatient facility architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2022, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Oct 6, 2022
Top 90 Hospital Facility Contractors + CM Firms for 2022
Turner Construction, Brasfield & Gorrie, DPR Construction, and JE Dunn top the ranking of the nation's largest hospital facility contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2022, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Oct 6, 2022
Top 80 Hospital Facility Engineering + EA Firms for 2022
Jacobs, AECOM, WSP, and Gresham Smith head the ranking of the nation's largest hospital facility engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2022, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Oct 6, 2022
Top 130 Hospital Facility Architecture + AE Firms for 2022
HDR, HKS, CannonDesign, and Stantec top the ranking of the nation's largest hospital facility architecture and architecture/engineering (AE) firms for 2022, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report.
Giants 400 | Oct 6, 2022
Top 115 Healthcare Sector Contractors + CM Firms for 2022
Turner Construction, Brasfield & Gorrie, DPR Construction, and JE Dunn Construction top the ranking of the nation's largest healthcare sector contractors and construction management (CM) firms for 2022, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking factors all healthcare sector work, including hospitals, outpatient facilities, and medical office buildings.
Giants 400 | Oct 6, 2022
Top 90 Healthcare Sector Engineering + EA Firms for 2022
Jacobs, AECOM, WSP, and IMEG Corp. head the ranking of the nation's largest healthcare sector engineering and engineering/architecture (EA) firms for 2022, as reported in Building Design+Construction's 2022 Giants 400 Report. Note: This ranking factors all healthcare sector work, including hospitals, outpatient facilities, and medical office buildings.