Milwaukee City Hall, built in 1896, recently underwent a meticulous reconstruction and renovation that lasted more than four years. |
When Milwaukee's City Hall was completed in 1896, it was, at 394 feet in height, the third-tallest structure in the United States. Designed by Henry C. Koch, it was a statement of civic pride and a monument to Milwaukee's German heritage. It was placed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1973 and designated a National Historic Landmark in 2005.
The massive bell tower of City Hall is supported by an armature of vertical and sloping steel trusses and beams embedded within four ornamental masonry and terra cotta gable facades. The design motif is echoed by 20 smaller gables on the east and west facades and larger cross gables at the center and north end of the building. The focus of each gable in the south tower is a white-faced, illuminated clock, just as in the main tower. Coal-fired boilers provided steam heat for the building and drive for the turbines of four DC power generators.
Over the building's century-plus life, the repetitive freeze-thaw cycles of the upper Midwest, combined with the absence of cavity walls for proper drainage, permitted water to damage the building's entire structure and skin. Over time, water from rain, sleet, hail, snow, condensation, and absorption had all but destroyed the integrity of the building's terra cotta and brick envelope, and its steel frame was slowly corroding within its perpetually damp masonry walls.
A full building assessment of the exterior condition of Milwaukee City Hall was done before construction began. |
In 2001, the Milwaukee Common Council approved funding for a forensic investigation of the building's envelope. The New York office of Simpson Gumpertz & Heger and Wiss Janney Elstner Associates, Northbrook, Ill., sent engineering teams to assess the building's façade from top to bottom.
Both teams brought grim news. The landmark was in need of immediate and extensive repairs and restoration. Experts were brought in to discuss its restoration, particularly for the primary building materials: brick, terra cotta, stone, copper, and slate. Over a three-day period, the recommendations, protocols, and restoration techniques were compiled in a condition assessment report by WJE and evaluated by a group of experts. The consensus: “Do it right and do it now.”
A multidisciplinary team led by architect Engberg Anderson (restoration design, detailing, and project management), SGH (structural studies, forensic investigations, and design), Bloom Companies (structural engineer) and associate architect Quinn Evans | Architects (historic structures report) was selected, with the WJE report as the underlying document to determine standards and procedures.
Because Milwaukee City Hall was built at a time when “master builders” determined the selection and specification of building materials and systems, the Building Team had to work backwards to understand the cause and effect of building detail failures and to redesign precise details, using modern technology that would allow visual repetition of the original. Original materials that still had visual and physical integrity remained in place.
The best available original drawings were scanned and converted to CAD, enabling the team to replicate the original hand-drawn details of the building's sections and elevations. The plan to redetail the historic building using new methods and materials remained consistent throughout the peer review and construction process.
After general contractor J.P. Cullen & Sons, Janesville, Wis., was selected in 2004, the full Building Team—including major subcontractors— had the first of many meetings to set project goals for the restoration—a process that would continue for more than three years. Coincidentally, during that first meeting a big chunk of terra cotta fell from the south tower onto the copper roof, slid off, and crashed onto the street 200 feet below. The incident underscored the urgency of their task and drew the team together from that day forward.
Forensic, design, construction, and scaffolding engineering included installing temporary steel outrigger beams to the south tower to support the upper scaffolding. This was done to allow a reduction in setback that was required to successfully bring scaffolding closer to the upper reaches of the tower.
More than 19,000 pieces of slate and 115,000 pounds of copper were used. Nineteen hundred windows were restored, and precisely 13,404 pieces of terra cotta were replaced. Two hundred thousand pressed bricks were manufactured using techniques akin to those from which the original bricks were made. Tons of additional structural steel members were used to repair and stabilize the clock tower structure.
Eugene Matthews, a decorative terra cotta manufacturer from Northern California, and brick-making expert IXL Brick from Medicine Hat, Alb., were brought in to replicate these materials in the towers and walls. J.P. Cullen & Sons oversaw the painstaking installation of these materials.
In the end, the restoration more than complied with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for the Treatment of Historic Properties.
“It's a staggering work of preservation and historical accuracy,” said K. Nam Shiu, PE, SE, vice president at Walker Restoration Consultants and a Reconstruction Awards judge. “It's a handmade building, and it's so very difficult to be that true to the original design intent, down to every building material used.”
Related Stories
| Aug 11, 2010
'Flexible' building designed to physically respond to the environment
The ecoFLEX project, designed by a team from Shepley Bulfinch, has won a prestigious 2009 Unbuilt Architecture Design Award from the Boston Society of Architects. EcoFLEX features heat-sensitive assemblies composed of a series of bi-material strips. The assemblies’ form modulate with the temperature to create varying levels of shading and wind shielding, flexing when heated to block sunlight and contracting when cooled to allow breezes to pass through the screen.
| Aug 11, 2010
8 Things You Should Know About Designing a Roof
Roofing industry expert Joseph Schwetz maintains that there is an important difference between what building codes require and what the construction insurance industry—notably mutual insurance firm Factory Mutual—demands—and that this difference can lead to problems in designing a roof.
| Aug 11, 2010
Piano's 'Flying Carpet'
Italian architect Renzo Piano refers to his $294 million, 264,000-sf Modern Wing of the Art Institute of Chicago as a “temple of light.” That's all well and good, but how did Piano and the engineers from London-based Arup create an almost entirely naturally lit interior while still protecting the priceless works of art in the Institute's third-floor galleries from dangerous ultravio...
| Aug 11, 2010
Seven tips for specifying and designing with insulated metal wall panels
Insulated metal panels, or IMPs, have been a popular exterior wall cladding choice for more than 30 years. These sandwich panels are composed of liquid insulating foam, such as polyurethane, injected between two aluminum or steel metal face panels to form a solid, monolithic unit. The result is a lightweight, highly insulated (R-14 to R-30, depending on the thickness of the panel) exterior clad...
| Aug 11, 2010
Nurturing the Community
The best seat in the house at the new Seahawks Stadium in Seattle isn't on the 50-yard line. It's in the southeast corner, at the very top of the upper bowl. "From there you have a corner-to-corner view of the field and an inspiring grasp of the surrounding city," says Kelly Kerns, project leader with architect/engineer Ellerbe Becket, Kansas City, Mo.
| Aug 11, 2010
AIA Course: Historic Masonry — Restoration and Renovation
Historic restoration and preservation efforts are accelerating throughout the U.S., thanks in part to available tax credits, awards programs, and green building trends. While these projects entail many different building components and systems, façade restoration—as the public face of these older structures—is a key focus. Earn 1.0 AIA learning unit by taking this free course from Building Design+Construction.
| Aug 11, 2010
AIA Course: Enclosure strategies for better buildings
Sustainability and energy efficiency depend not only on the overall design but also on the building's enclosure system. Whether it's via better air-infiltration control, thermal insulation, and moisture control, or more advanced strategies such as active façades with automated shading and venting or novel enclosure types such as double walls, Building Teams are delivering more efficient, better performing, and healthier building enclosures.