flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

Washington Monument restored after 2011 East Coast earthquake

Reconstruction Awards

Washington Monument restored after 2011 East Coast earthquake

This restoration and repair project involved re-pointing 2.5 miles of mortar joints, repairing 1,200 linear feet of cracks, and installing 150 sf of Dutchman repairs.


By David Barista, Editorial Director | November 30, 2015
Washington Monument restored after rare East Coast earthquake

An earthquake and Hurricane Irene caused damage to the Washington Monument in 2011. Photos courtesy Hill International

On August 23, 2011, a magnitude-5.8 earthquake—the largest temblor east of the Rocky Mountains in more than a century—struck Louisa County, Va., causing significant damage to historic structures in Washington, D.C. Among the most severely affected was the Washington Monument. Cracks formed in the century-old stone at the top of the monument, and water damage was discovered inside the monument after Hurricane Irene hit the area later that month.

BRONZE AWARD

Building Team: Hill International (submitting firm, CM); National Park Service (owner); Wiss, Janney, Elstner Associates (architect); Tutor Perini (GC)
General Information: Size: 93,408 sf. 
Construction cost: $11.3 million. Construction time: November 2011 to May 2014. 
Delivery method: Design-bid-build

This restoration and repair project, which was completed under budget and eight days early (despite several setbacks), involved re-pointing 2.5 miles of mortar joints, repairing 1,200 linear feet of cracks, and installing 150 sf of Dutchman repairs.

For the initial damage assessment, a team of engineers rappelled down the outside of the monument and documented the damage using iPads. Once the scaffolding was installed, the team conducted more thorough reviews from the 490-foot level to the top of the monument, where the majority of the damage had occurred.

To keep costs within budget, the team carefully measured the unit price repairs and determined which were crucial and which were not. Available funding was reallocated to pay for scope additions that were deemed essential. The team also established uniform standards to serve as a baseline for repairs throughout the monument.

This process eliminated unnecessary aesthetic repairs, prevented scope creep, and ensured lasting repairs.

 

Related Stories

Reconstruction Awards | Nov 26, 2019

Sweetest sounds: Metropolitan Opera House

An early 20th-century opera house now hosts concerts from Disney Acapella to Weezer.

Reconstruction Awards | Nov 25, 2019

The University of Chicago Harris School at the Keller Center

Project team goes all out for LEED Platinum and the Living Building Challenge.

Reconstruction Awards | Nov 22, 2019

Let there be light: Union Station Great Hall

What’s the cure for a leaky skylight? Another skylight built above it, of course.

Reconstruction Awards | Nov 21, 2019

Temporary quarters: Senate of Canada Building

Canada’s Senate gets an interim home in what was once the capital’s main train station.

Reconstruction Awards | Nov 19, 2019

Springfield Technical Community College: Goodbye to 'the shuffle'

College unites student services under one roof.

Reconstruction Awards | Nov 18, 2019

The Paint Factory: Not just a new coat of paint

An enlightened A/E firm is spurring redevelopment in an old industrial section of Little Rock.

Reconstruction Awards | Nov 15, 2019

Back on track: Union Terminal renovation and restoration

Painstaking care went into restoring Cincinnati’s train terminal/museum complex.

Reconstruction Awards | Nov 14, 2019

Museum at the Gateway Arch: Subterranean sensation

The project team used its creativity to overcome floods and other obstacles to construction.

Reconstruction Awards | Nov 13, 2019

Zachry Engineering Education Complex: Rethinking engineering education

Texas A&M’s engineering school builds for future growth.

Reconstruction Awards | Nov 12, 2019

Linode Headquarters: High-tech + historic

New headquarters mixes old and new to help this fast-growth company attract top talent.

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Giants 400

BD+C Awards Programs

Entry information and past winners for Building Design+Construction's two major awards programs: 40 Under 40 and Giants 400



halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021