flexiblefullpage
billboard
interstitial1
catfish1
Currently Reading

2020 Science & Technology Facilities Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the S+T sector

Giants 400

2020 Science & Technology Facilities Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the S+T sector

HDR, Jacobs, and Turner head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.


By BD+C STAFF | December 3, 2020
2020 Science & Technology Facilities Giants: Top architecture, engineering, and construction firms in the S+T sector

Photo: Gaëtan Bussy from Pixabay

   

HDR, Jacobs, and Turner head BD+C's rankings of the nation's largest science and technology (S+T) facilities sector architecture, engineering, and construction firms, as reported in the 2020 Giants 400 Report.

Top 45 Science & Technology Facilities Sector Architecture and AE Firms for 2020
  FIRM 2019 REVENUE
1 HDR $49,784,918
2 SmithGroup $42,644,554
3 Perkins and Will $31,508,770
4 HOK $29,259,000
5 Page $22,500,000
6 Skidmore, Owings & Merrill $17,597,921
7 SGA $16,514,202
8 TRIA $13,327,250
9 CannonDesign $12,000,000
10 EXP $11,295,975
11 EwingCole $10,800,000
12 BSA LifeStructures $10,583,465
13 Perkins Eastman $10,497,913
14 DGA $9,140,372
15 Clark Enersen Partners, The $8,844,964
16 Ayers Saint Gross $8,732,874
17 CO Architects $5,625,400
18 Flad Architects $5,391,000
19 HGA $5,164,162
20 LMN Architects $5,000,000
21 Huntsman Architectural Group $4,897,443
22 TreanorHL $4,600,000
23 BWBR $4,544,000
24 Hastings+Chivetta Architects $3,568,754
25 NBBJ $3,200,000
26 Architectural Resources Cambridge (ARC) $2,746,567
27 Clark Nexsen $2,700,000
28 MBH Architects $2,510,000
29 HLW $2,500,000
30 Gensler $2,211,090
31 HED $2,000,000
32 KGD Architecture $1,958,583
33 Alliiance $1,782,508
34 Ballinger $1,741,967
35 Ware Malcomb $1,703,756
36 Bergmann $1,500,000
37 RSP Architects $893,000
38 Margulies Perruzzi $889,855
39 Kirksey Architecture $830,711
40 Mithun $771,275
41 Urbahn Architects $677,662
42 YGH Architecture $524,640
43 Taylor Design $509,000
44 CPL $191,190
45 AHL $149,813
46 Leo A Daly $58,491
47 Ratio Architects $4,359

BD+C 2020 Giants 400 Report

 

Top 30 Science & Technology Facilities Sector Engineering and EA Firms for 2020
  FIRM 2019 REVENUE
1 Jacobs $155,000,000
2 Jensen Hughes $10,983,620
3 BRPH Architects Engineers $7,163,817
4 RMF Engineering $7,000,000
5 Vanderweil Engineers $6,300,800
6 KPFF Consulting Engineers $6,279,000
7 STV $3,507,364
8 Dewberry $3,474,828
9 Newcomb & Boyd $3,317,035
10 PS&S $3,228,000
11 Thornton Tomasetti $3,175,392
12 IMEG Corp. $2,896,698
13 RMH Group, The $2,170,155
14 CDM Smith $1,903,525
15 Syska Hennessy Group $1,780,453
16 M/E Engineering $1,436,365
17 Jaros, Baum & Bolles $1,398,116
18 NV5 Global $1,326,000
19 Arup $1,208,763
20 Mazzetti $1,102,926
21 Paradigm Structural Engineers $1,076,088
22 AKF Group $860,000
23 Bridgers & Paxton Consulting Engineers $800,282
24 SSOE Group $773,839
25 Peter Basso Associates $300,000
26 Dunham Associates $250,000
27 Osborn Engineering $225,000
28 Arora Engineers $208,133
29 Highland Associates $200,000
30 KLH Engineers $171,529
31 Milhouse Engineering and Construction $96,508
32 Wallace Engineering $50,000
33 Walter P Moore $24,597

BD+C 2020 Giants 400 Report

 

Top 25 Science & Technology Facilities Sector Contractors and CM Firms for 2020
  FIRM 2019 REVENUE
1 Turner Construction Company $355,370,930
2 DPR Construction $328,591,000
3 Whiting-Turner Contracting Company, The $267,633,449
4 Gilbane Building Company $181,237,000
5 Jacobs $88,169,000
6 McCownGordon Construction, LLC $82,032,154
7 Skanska USA $60,157,913
8 Messer Construction $55,609,097
9 Columbia $54,000,000
10 McCarthy Holdings $52,879,764
11 LeChase Construction Services $51,177,952
12 Swinerton $40,000,000
13 Barton Malow $34,369,566
14 BRPH Architects Engineers $11,989,183
15 Andersen Construction $6,400,000
16 Kraus-Anderson Construction $6,000,000
17 Donohoe Construction $5,186,812
18 Cumming $5,015,750
19 Hagerman Group, The $5,000,000
20 Russell Construction $5,000,000
21 STV $4,308,536
22 Fortis Construction $3,886,382
23 Robins & Morton $2,965,922
24 Hill International $415,243
25 W.E. O'Neil Construction $234,804

BD+C 2020 Giants 400 Report

 

 

BACK TO THE 2020 GIANTS 400 LANDING PAGE

Related Stories

MFPRO+ News | Jul 22, 2024

6 multifamily WAFX 2024 Prize winners

Over 30 projects tackling global challenges such as climate change, public health, and social inequality have been named winners of the World Architecture Festival’s WAFX Awards.

Office Buildings | Jul 22, 2024

U.S. commercial foreclosures increased 48% in June from last year

The commercial building sector continues to be under financial pressure as foreclosures nationwide increased 48% in June compared to June 2023, according to ATTOM, a real estate data analysis firm.

Codes and Standards | Jul 22, 2024

Tennessee developers can now hire their own building safety inspectors

A new law in Tennessee allows developers to hire their own building inspectors to check for environmental, safety, and construction violations. The law is intended to streamline the building process, particularly in rapidly growing communities.

Codes and Standards | Jul 22, 2024

New FEMA rules include climate change impacts

FEMA’s new rules governing rebuilding after disasters will take into account the impacts of climate change on future flood risk. For decades, the agency has followed a 100-year floodplain standard—an area that has a 1% chance of flooding in a given year.

Construction Costs | Jul 18, 2024

Data center construction costs for 2024

Gordian’s data features more than 100 building models, including computer data centers. These localized models allow architects, engineers, and other preconstruction professionals to quickly and accurately create conceptual estimates for future builds. This table shows a five-year view of costs per square foot for one-story computer data centers. 

Sustainability | Jul 18, 2024

Grimshaw launches free online tool to help accelerate decarbonization of buildings

Minoro, an online platform to help accelerate the decarbonization of buildings, was recently launched by architecture firm Grimshaw, in collaboration with more than 20 supporting organizations including World Business Council for Sustainable Development (WBCSD), RIBA, Architecture 2030, the World Green Building Council (WorldGBC) and several national Green Building Councils from across the globe.

University Buildings | Jul 17, 2024

University of Louisville Student Success Building will be new heart of engineering program

A new Student Success Building will serve as the heart of the newly designed University of Louisville’s J.B. Speed School of Engineering. The 115,000-sf structure will greatly increase lab space and consolidate student services to one location.

Healthcare Facilities | Jul 16, 2024

Watch on-demand: Key Trends in the Healthcare Facilities Market for 2024-2025

Join the Building Design+Construction editorial team for this on-demand webinar on key trends, innovations, and opportunities in the $65 billion U.S. healthcare buildings market. A panel of healthcare design and construction experts present their latest projects, trends, innovations, opportunities, and data/research on key healthcare facilities sub-sectors. A 2024-2025 U.S. healthcare facilities market outlook is also presented.

K-12 Schools | Jul 15, 2024

A Cleveland suburb opens a $31.7 million new middle school and renovated high school

Accommodating 1,283 students in grades 6-12, the Warrensville, Ohio school complex features flexible learning environments and offers programs ranging from culinary arts and firefighting training to e-sports.

MFPRO+ News | Jul 15, 2024

More permits for ADUs than single-family homes issued in San Diego

Popularity of granny flats growing in California

boombox1
boombox2
native1

More In Category


Urban Planning

Bridging the gap: How early architect involvement can revolutionize a city’s capital improvement plans

Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs) typically span three to five years and outline future city projects and their costs. While they set the stage, the design and construction of these projects often extend beyond the CIP window, leading to a disconnect between the initial budget and evolving project scope. This can result in financial shortfalls, forcing cities to cut back on critical project features.



Libraries

Reasons to reinvent the Midcentury academic library

DLR Group's Interior Design Leader Gretchen Holy, Assoc. IIDA, shares the idea that a designer's responsibility to embrace a library’s history, respect its past, and create an environment that will serve student populations for the next 100 years.

halfpage1

Most Popular Content

  1. 2021 Giants 400 Report
  2. Top 150 Architecture Firms for 2019
  3. 13 projects that represent the future of affordable housing
  4. Sagrada Familia completion date pushed back due to coronavirus
  5. Top 160 Architecture Firms 2021