While federal government proposals calling for $1 trillion in infrastructure spending would be credit positive for state and local economies, several constraints suggest that investment will be slow to ramp up, according to Moody’s Investors Service in a new report. Due to a lack of bipartisan agreement over funding mechanisms, as well as regulatory hurdles and practical constraints, Moody’s expects additional spending to be modest in 2017 and 2018.
Budget pressure at all levels of U.S. government in recent years has limited the ability to adequately reinvest in the nation’s critical infrastructure. Both parties in Washington have called for initiatives to address the funding gap, but disagreements over private sector involvement may prevent progress toward a consensus.
“Either proposal would amount to a $100 billion annual increase in spending on infrastructure,” says AJ Sabatelle, a Moody’s Managing Director and the lead author of the report. “But finding a reasonable balance between direct government spending and private investment will take time.”
In addition to political disagreement, regulatory approval issues like environmental reviews and litigation can slow the rate at which new infrastructure projects can materialize, according to the report, “US Infrastructure: Large Increase in US Infrastructure Spending Will Be Slow to Develop.” Meaningful acceleration of lead times for new projects would likely require regulatory reform involving federal, state and local agencies or passage of new legislation.
Practical considerations regarding the pace at which new projects can proceed are also likely to hamper near-term investment.
“Such a rapid increase would pose significant challenges to large engineering and construction firms, which would need to hire and train new project managers and locate skilled laborers,” says Sabatelle. “The sector is going to need time to gear up.”
If private capital is to play a significant role in facilitating the increase in infrastructure spending, the use of public-private partnerships (P3s) will likely be necessary. While the pipeline has grown, P3s currently fund less than 5% of annual infrastructure investment. Moody’s anticipates continued evolution of public policy and additional legislative action that promotes P3s and simplifies their legal framework.
Related Stories
Market Data | Jun 21, 2017
Design billings maintain solid footing, strong momentum reflected in project inquiries/design contracts
Balanced growth results in billings gains in all sectors.
Industry Research | Jun 15, 2017
Commercial Construction Index indicates high revenue and employment expectations for 2017
USG Corporation (USG) and U.S. Chamber of Commerce release survey results gauging confidence among industry leaders.
Industry Research | Jun 13, 2017
Gender, racial, and ethnic diversity increases among emerging professionals
For the first time since NCARB began collecting demographics data, gender equity improved along every career stage.
Industry Research | May 25, 2017
Project labor agreement mandates inflate cost of construction 13%
Ohio schools built under government-mandated project labor agreements (PLAs) cost 13.12 percent more than schools that were bid and constructed through fair and open competition.
Market Data | May 24, 2017
Design billings increasing entering height of construction season
All regions report positive business conditions.
Market Data | May 24, 2017
The top franchise companies in the construction pipeline
3 franchise companies comprise 65% of all rooms in the Total Pipeline.
Industry Research | May 24, 2017
These buildings paid the highest property taxes in 2016
Office buildings dominate the list, but a residential community climbed as high as number two on the list.
Market Data | May 16, 2017
Construction firms add 5,000 jobs in April
Unemployment down to 4.4%; Specialty trade jobs dip slightly.
Industry Research | May 4, 2017
How your AEC firm can go from the shortlist to winning new business
Here are four key lessons to help you close more business.
Engineers | May 3, 2017
At first buoyed by Trump election, U.S. engineers now less optimistic about markets, new survey shows
The first quarter 2017 (Q1/17) of ACEC’s Engineering Business Index (EBI) dipped slightly (0.5 points) to 66.0.